[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Sure, you voted third party so technically your hands are clean.

If voting for Democrats makes you complicit, then the net is cast so broad that their hands are absolutely not clean either. If they are supporting the state in any way, such as by paying taxes, then they too are "complicit" in much the same way.

It's a vanity vote. That's it. It allows them to pretend they are morally superior, without actually having to do anything.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 hours ago

Dems weren’t erasing their existence.

There are legit criticisms of their support of Israel. . .but accusing dems of "erasing the existence of Muslims" is so detached from reality I'm not even sure how one would even begin to get one believing that to join the rest of us in the real world.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

That's not using it as collateral. That's taking money out of it that you have to pay back to yourself. That means you'll lose out on the growth in the markets that the people using their investments as collateral don't lose.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago

You can't use a 401k as collateral for a loan.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago

I'm curious, could you provided these numbers?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

My parents, for God knows what reason, leave their dog treats in a bowl on the table. They look like oyster crackers.

I walked in one day to find my aunt eating them. I laughed and told her they were dog treats, and she was like "i was wondering why they tasted a bit weird... But they're not bad." Lol

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

You were able to leave your job for a month, come back and continue like nothing happened, then were able to resign a month after that...and you are saying you weren't treated like a human?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

At best you were going to get some tweets. Nothing might actually be better. Lol

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

No, not at all. It's one of the most incorrectly used words, usually just as a synonym for lying. This is especially egregious as it's being used as a synonym for hypocrisy.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago

Are we arguing that these bomb threats would have happened regardless of Vance's lie about immigrants eating pets, and Trump's mindlessly parroting it? Wow! What a coincidence.

And even if they are hoaxes, just like when idiots swat other people on their streams, it's still a risky situation.

Let's not downplay the severity of Trump's lies here.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

The most reasonable conclusion is that they aren't all correct.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 4 days ago

Say I have 6 people all guessing a different result of a roll of a D6. It's inconceivable that they are all right, and it's absolutely not a "reasonable conclusion" that they are all wrong.

Additionally, if we include the people who believe they know there is no god (a position held with no proof) as a religion (which is not much of a stretch) then it's also included in the " they are all wrong" group.

I lack a belief in a god because I've been provided no evidence that own exists, but the logic in this picture is full of holes.

view more: next ›

EatATaco

joined 11 months ago