196

16489 readers

2669 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

136

My favorite character rule (lemmy.world)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 60 points 11 months ago (8 children)

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're refering to as Furry, is in fact, YIFF/Furry, or as I've recently taken to calling it, YIFF plus Furry...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (6 children)

When did Stallmann actually say that line?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago (4 children)

He didn't. He did respond to it though: https://www.gnu.org/gnu/incorrect-quotation.en.html

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

.. in that link he says only the italicized parts are things he hasn't said

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The page is confusing: the marked parts are the ones containing confusing/inaccurate statements. I don't think this means that the other parts are verbatim quotes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

https://www.gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html
Sounds very different, too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

there are some parts at least that sound pretty similar

the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called “Linux” distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

Whether you use GNU/Linux or not, please don't confuse the public by using the name “Linux” ambiguously. Linux is the kernel, one of the essential major components of the system. The system as a whole is basically the GNU system, with Linux added. When you're talking about this combination, please call it “GNU/Linux.”

I think everything points to stallman being more worried about the factual errors in the quote (rather than the qualities that make the quote funny)

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)