this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
899 points (94.5% liked)

Comic Strips

12355 readers
3215 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I have observed that "very clever" people on the internet have a tendency to disregard solutions that are only partial, even if there is little to no downside to them.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"Oh yeah? Why should I be wearing a seatbelt in a car when it won't even save me if we crash head-on into a semi truck at 100 kph?"

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I skydive and people ask why a lot of us wear helmets since it’s not saving you if you hit the ground. The plane or other people can hurt you plenty.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It also means I can just flip my front visor down and not worry about stinking goggles.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

Also a valid reason. I stick my audible altimeter in there too…so that as well.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong too, but if you're coming in on a parachute and somehow hit your head during the landing, that could hurt a lot, right?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

If you tumble then yes, it can help there too. It’s usually banging it on exit or turbulence or somebody coming in a little hot to a formation that I’m happy I have it. Pretty sure if you hit the rear wing even with a helmet that’s gonna cause you some issues though.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These days it might actually save you. Cars have gotten stupid safe in the last decade or so. I've seen a car smashed between two semis and the driver only had minor injuries (after they cut them out).

Crumpel zones ftw!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Not to be confused with crumple scones.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So you don't get launched out the window and then crushed by your own car for the non-semi accidents.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

So someone doesn't have to scrape you off the road.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago

Not even partial in this case. I mean, the "turbulence sending you into the ceiling" event is fully resolved here.

Anyway, just here looking for the common sense pedantic clarification, found it, so now here just to say good job.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If you play the SNES version of Monopoly, you can play against CPU opponents. Mind you, this is artificial intelligence coded in 1992, on a cartridge with about 16mb of storage space for the entire game. Only a fraction of that is dedicated to the AI decision process.

If you propose a trade, I'll give CPU $5 in exchange for $0, the CPU will respond with NO DEAL!!!

But if you propose "I'll give you $100 in exchange for $0, the CPU replies "IT'S A DEAL!!!"

The CPU was holding out for a bigger handout!

Unrelated, but if you hold the B button, and don't release, you'll keep looping the shaking the dice animation. They use digital photo scans of a real hand/arm.......if it were disembodied. And the animation looks like he's just jacking off.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wow, talking about NES Monopoly on a post about airplane seatbelts.

I went down a bit of a rabbit hole on NES Monopoly because I used to play the game and wanted to see if I held the B button. Probably did, but I'm not sure.

Anyway, the world record speedrun of Monopoly takes advantage of the trade mechanics. Trade the CPU mortgaged properties for all of their money and they'll lose the game because you have to pay a 10% fee on any properties traded that were mortgaged. And if you take all their money in the trade they don't have any to pay the penalty.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Not NES. SNES.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You weren't kidding.

Edit: I see now you said SNES, can't find a good animation of that one though. But I can see in the screenshots that it's a pseudo-mocap human hand and yeah, that would be worse.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Old-school Monopoly jerkoff is how I discovered we can upload gifs now w/o using third-party hosters.

There’s something to that animation…


SNES is worse huh?:

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Oh man I haven’t seen that classic in a while. Thanks for the smile!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I often see that in political arguments. There's much to be said about wasting political capital on a poor and partial solution, but as you said, people bitch even if there's no real downside.