this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2772 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I find the threat of GPS loss to be hard to believe. Theyd have to take out 38 GPS satelites and presumably any of the other navagation satellites American allies have in orbit, and presumably theyd have to not damage their own navigation satelites in the process. I also doubt they could do that all at the same time, or quick enough that no one could respond. Im sure they have the capability, and im sure they have an idea of what the operation would have to look like but in terms of a plan that's actionable, I have big doubts.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss that threat.

They know exactly where in the sky they are. They know what frequencies their antennas are tuned to. I'm betting burning out those transceivers would not be an impossible feat.

I also don't know how well they put up against really large lasers

They've also been fully capable of putting s*** into space for years. I would not put it past them to have some form of combination weather/spy satellite and weapons platform out there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

They must be aware of the concept of re-ta-lia-tion. You shoot down my satellites, I shoot down yours. Nobody wins and we are all back 40 years.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

or they could jam the signal.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Where though? They just gonna fly enough jammers up into orbit to cover the entire path and all the satelites and pretend thats not going to also jam every navagation satelite including their own and China, their biggest allys? I don't see it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Blowing up the GPS satellites is certainly an option and there's not much we could do to stop them. We know that China has succesfuly tested an anti-satellite missile in 2007. I would not be surprised if Russia was working on the technology at the same time. If they can't or don't want to blow up the satellites, then they could perhaps launch their own jamming satellites to orbit near the existing GPS satellites would work.

Edit: It just occurred to me that you don't need to jam them. Just put up your own satellites that mimic the GPS satellites to throw off the calculations of anyone trying to use them. Your devices wouldn't know which signals were legit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just put up your own satellites that mimic the GPS satellites to throw off the calculations of anyone trying to use them. Your devices wouldn't know which signals were legit.

Do this, then get absolutely raw dog fucked by the US (and any other competent) military, who has absolutely no issue with ground nav or weapons guidance because they all use encrypted GPS signals.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

There's also back ups. so destroying the GPS isn't a good solve either.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Soviet Union proved that it was able to shoot down satellites in the 60s. The technical difficulty of hitting a satellite with a missile is not really an obstacle here

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, the Soviet union could also mass produce tanks and planes. Russia today...

Glances at Ukraine

Is using almost exclusively Soviet stock.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

China doing it in 2007 was big news because they joined the club. The West and Russia has had the capability for decades.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Jam some strategic locations, like air travel hubs or highly populated areas for the highest impact. No need to jam wide open low population areas without military targets.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Real curious how Russia plans to get jamming equipment the size of a truck into those areas

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I also just don't see anyone in Russia deciding that were going to trigger article 5 by using a jammer on US soil. The risk reward is non existent unless they can make the whole country GPS and internet dark at the same time. Imagine that many resources going on the ground in a country as large as America. It's basically asking Ukraine to regain any territory they had a counter invasion plan ready for.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The jamming equipment could be the size of a briefcase; the received signal is below the noise floor.

Or it could be one satellite already in the air beaming to a specific area. Or a constellation of satellites already in the air who handoff coverage of a specific area. Or a hack of an existing satellite constellation command and control channel to reprogram the transmitters to cover up GPS L band.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You are not jamming GPS with a briefcase.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I’m familiar with radio systems. You could absolutely put a 1 kW L-band jammer in a briefcase, with an effective radius of probably a couple of miles.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

Huh. I went to go look at that stuff and it's definitely 2024. At any rate news articles made it clear that airports have dealt with GPS jamming for over a decade already and the FCC is pretty quick to send someone out with RDF equipment if it's not a transient signal from a highway. Planes aren't falling out of the sky so they've got a good idea of how to handle it already.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's easy you just drive the truck into the area. It's when you turn it on that's the issue. You're going to meet a lot of people very fast.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Like speedating with small arms fire!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

Lmao, not really. But it's fun to think about like that.