196

16489 readers

1878 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

205

Mat(rule)archy (i.pinimg.com)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (10 children)

honestly I think historically it would have made way more sense for inheritance to go through tha matrilineal line. I mean even if everything remains the same it makes more sense for a guy to be king because his mother is part of the family line. I am in no way endorsing monarchy in modern times I am just talking about the past. It seems obvious to me that family lines are more definitive by who actually bore you as opposed to who possibly inseminated.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

@HubertManne @jawa21 matrilineal inheritance (including crowns) existed among booking and Asian cultures.
There's historical precedent for how it worked

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

whats booking?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

@HubertManne @jawa21 Viking.
I didn't notice Google replacing the word.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

ok that would make more sense. thanks.

load more comments (6 replies)