this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
23 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7195 readers
646 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

These go right against our goals to increase use of solar and EVs. ☹️

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Really important for world emissions for the US specifically to transition to EVs too, considering it has the highest per capita road emissions in the world.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Most of that is because we truck everything and trains only get used for extreme bulk like coal

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

We can thank the US oil and auto industries (the same ones dictating these green energy tariffs to their political puppets), for that too.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It does sadly. On the flip side, China seems to be trying to capture car manufacturing markets by subsidizing their producers. This would probably be a bad thing in the future if allowed. Hopefully the US government does more work on making it easier to purchase electric cars in the US(specifically the price) while also reducing the need for driving.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Also no US auto-manufacturer is going all in on EVs, they're all mostly building gas-guzzling oversized trucks and SUVs. US automakers intentionally killed EVs in the 90s, and hoped no other country would start building them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Also no US auto-manufacturer is going all in on EVs

Tesla? Rivian? Lucid? Faraday? Fisker?

To be clear, yes, of course I understand that those are all luxury brands, but that doesn't make your statement any less false.

No, the major auto manufacturers aren't going all-in on EVs, but that are all getting deeper every year. There's no reason to expect that progress to slow down, as they're all quite entrenched in the technology at this point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Average new car cost is $55,821, and average cost of ownership is $12,182.

The American manufacturers do not want lower prices. Dealerships don't like electrics because there's less maintenance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

What exactly is wrong with a country subsidizing green energy products? Not only that, but making them available cheaply to other countries?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The US Government doesn't want US automakers to lose market share so that they have plenty of manufacturing capacity that could be retooled to make weapons in case of war.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Makes sense. Also petro-profits.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’m not precisely sure where I stand on this, but I understand the primary policy arguments for this decision would be something like this:

The problem comes later, when a specific actor has an outsized market share and then exploits their trade advantage for other concessions.

It also prohibits domestic competition for those products, especially in countries with high standards of living and wages. This negates competition and innovation, since most corporations don’t have the ability to compete with an entity with the capacity to eat cost like the Chinese government.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

The point of trade decisions, is to import products you don't have enough domestic production to cover the demand for.

We know that the US auto and oil industries have no sincere desire to build EVs anyway (or any green industry whatsoever), because they did their best to kill their domestic production of EVs in the 90s, and there's no US industry for solar panels.

This is all just part of the US's trade war with China, that is prioritizing the profits of its auto and oil industries over the wellbeing of the environment, and the desires of its citizens for electric vehicles.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

They're oversaturating the market with low-quality products. This can be a significant problem when there are safety implications.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Why can’t they just certify cars based on safety and ban unsafe ones instead of blanket ban the entire segment of them. It certainly helps the adoption of EV among masses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I'm sorry but this argument doesn't make sense. Don't you have safety rules in the US? If the Chinese cars aren't safe to drive nobody should be authorized to drive them in the first place. If they are safe, no need for tariffs then.

This decision has absolutely nothing to do with alleged poor manufacturing quality. It's protectionism, pure and simple.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The Chinese cars are probably much safer on the road then the huge pedestrian killing machines built by US manufacturers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Truck SUV moment: