this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
23 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7203 readers
274 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

What exactly is wrong with a country subsidizing green energy products? Not only that, but making them available cheaply to other countries?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The US Government doesn't want US automakers to lose market share so that they have plenty of manufacturing capacity that could be retooled to make weapons in case of war.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Makes sense. Also petro-profits.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’m not precisely sure where I stand on this, but I understand the primary policy arguments for this decision would be something like this:

The problem comes later, when a specific actor has an outsized market share and then exploits their trade advantage for other concessions.

It also prohibits domestic competition for those products, especially in countries with high standards of living and wages. This negates competition and innovation, since most corporations don’t have the ability to compete with an entity with the capacity to eat cost like the Chinese government.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

The point of trade decisions, is to import products you don't have enough domestic production to cover the demand for.

We know that the US auto and oil industries have no sincere desire to build EVs anyway (or any green industry whatsoever), because they did their best to kill their domestic production of EVs in the 90s, and there's no US industry for solar panels.

This is all just part of the US's trade war with China, that is prioritizing the profits of its auto and oil industries over the wellbeing of the environment, and the desires of its citizens for electric vehicles.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

They're oversaturating the market with low-quality products. This can be a significant problem when there are safety implications.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Why can’t they just certify cars based on safety and ban unsafe ones instead of blanket ban the entire segment of them. It certainly helps the adoption of EV among masses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I'm sorry but this argument doesn't make sense. Don't you have safety rules in the US? If the Chinese cars aren't safe to drive nobody should be authorized to drive them in the first place. If they are safe, no need for tariffs then.

This decision has absolutely nothing to do with alleged poor manufacturing quality. It's protectionism, pure and simple.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The Chinese cars are probably much safer on the road then the huge pedestrian killing machines built by US manufacturers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Truck SUV moment: