wolfshadowheart

I was wearing loose boxers... For real lol.

You can make ricotta the same way, but it seems that more commonly uses lemon juice

Just pay attention to the instances the comments come from. This account is federated with .world and I am always seeing the most awful takes on here and it seems like most of the time it comes from users there.

I have another account not federated with .world, but it is with pretty much everything else. There's fewer comments (rarely over 100) but it's usually actual discussion and not revolving around anti-humanitarian practices.

It's not a guarantee, but it seems very very high.

I would have been interested to see where he went with it, though I do wish he would have reworked Finns casino plot

My favorite interpretation of the Bible is basically it's a collection of stories from medieval times. It was rough back then I mean if you fell in the mud, your life was over. You're trapped and no one is helping you, your kindling won't be warming your family tonight.

And then this dude comes along and a hand comes in view. You flinch at first, I mean why not kick a dog while he's down? But no, the hand grabs your arm and pulls you out of the mud. Nobody saves your life! This man is, this good man is a saint! His story is written.

A few decades later another man collapsed in the sun and another nice guy gave him some water. His story is written.

Another few decades later a different guy is low a few cattle and sheep and his neighbor, maybe someone who was moving to Egypt, just fuckin' gives you his whole flock. His story is yadda yadda yadda.

Jesus is just a collection of society's niceties. Why else do you think these people were living for 900 years!? "Sonny boy your great great great great great great great grandfather from 50 years ago only survived because Jesus pulled him from the mud!"

In short - the stories of Jesus' deeds was never just one person. I mean, literally the guy whose skeleton they have sure, but in terms of the Bible these stories existed long before Jesus came along, then more stories got added after him too, many attributed to him retroactively.

Heh. J.J. Abrams and lens flare, meet your match, Zack Snyder and Slow-Mo

Here is the best description of J.J. Abrams:

He is able to tell a really good cliffhanger.

Give him a single project. Super 8? Cloverfield? The Pilot of Lost?

It's hard to deny their merits. But then he's given projects like Star Trek, which he used to show he could make a Star Wars movie. Then he got Star Wars and eased into it by retelling A New Hope and abandoned it.

Wasn't Abrams only involved with the production of the pilot and then minimally involved with the first season? From my understanding he pretty much had no involvement and Damien Lindelof had to scratch teeth to try and get some insight on where to go forward.

Then between the writers strikes and well...

I'm at the point where I don't think it's that, but that the writers have been such high turnover/overworked/on-striked for the last 8 years that it's all they can come up with.

Like what's happening with Marvel right now, how multiple projects are having the exact same issue of having the overview but none of the specifics. Blade has been rewritten like 4 times now, Daredevil:BA has been reworked at least 3 times now I believe as well and recently decided that Netflix's content actually will be canon, so...

That is basically the same story for Star Wars. Except IMO it's even worse because J.J. Abrams basically made Star Trek a Star Wars movie and then when he got the opportunity to plan out a full trilogy he declines? Then when he doesn't like the direction he comes back and doesn't expand but retcons?

There's no plan because it seems like there's no longstanding consistent writers or team involved (Abrams + Kasdan, Johnson, then the Kasdan's again) to have a full overarching story.

All that said, there are elements of all of them that I think are done really well. I don't quite have the same perception of 8 for Luke's character, visions of the Dark Side had him falter and the action onset Ben's descent. It's nearly a self fulfilling cycle and I don't think it is entirely "out of character" for Luke so much as that scene to me feels like PTSD from his vision in Empire. He then emulates his Master Yoda, isolating and living on the land and minimizing his connection to the Force.

I think it works very well for his character with the circumstances surrounding it. What I'm more skeptical on is him leaving a cryptic pathway to finding him and the amount of time that passes through the rest of the movie, and his general demeanor when he's found.

I have other issues with it, but overall I think it would have worked fine if the next movie had supported any of it, instead of just trying to "fix" whatever wasn't part of the original vision. 9 has some aspects I like about it though, I think the Force Dyad was actually alright, their kiss isn't my favorite but the way I see it is more of a merging of The Force than romance. tbh I can't remember much else at the moment, I just know I'm like 50/50 on the sequels, there's some parts that are conceptually really good and pulled of moderately well and then others that just make no sense and would clearly have been avoided with any semblance of some foresight.

Is it stealing if it's been dead for 30 years? Or is it modernizing it?

And AUS doesn't exist!

Yes but it's up charged by the delivery app you use + tip to the driver so an $8 cake becomes $16 after taxes fees and tip.

On the other hand, cake.