this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
337 points (92.2% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3734 readers
477 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ **8. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@[email protected] for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 64 points 9 months ago (10 children)

This won't be popular, but I LOVED his first two Trek movies. Acting was on point without making a caricature of the original people. The call backs in the Kahn movie were great. Both were exciting, engaging, all that.

I have no idea what happened in the third movie. Tried to watch it 4 times. Still never finished it, can't tell you a thing about it.

Begin my punishment. My body is ready.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 9 months ago (6 children)

I definitely enjoyed the movies, but at the risk of sounding like a gatekeeper, they didn't really feel like Trek. It felt more to me like an action sci-fi in the vein of, say, Avatar, with a coat of Trek paint to lure the fans in.

Still enjoyable, mind you, but not really something I remember when I think of the Trek universe.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The '09 Star Trek movie, judged on its merits as a Star Trek movie, was a pretty good Star Wars movie.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

No I completely agree with you. Without those first two Abrams Trek movies, I probably wouldn’t have ever watched any of the Trek shows.

Him and Rian Johnson fucked Star Wars though. Completely ruined it for me and I refuse to watch any new Star Wars content.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I will honestly say that, as someone who did not like Rogue One (I seem to be in a small minority), Andor was one of the best sci-fi series I'd seen in a while. I recommend watching it. It's only barely related to the rest of Star Wars. There's no Force or Jedi in it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Rogue One and Solo were my two favorite of the Disney abominations. They were solid movies. Andor was amazing and could be watched by anyone who liked sci-fi: the story was compelling.

If they told more stories about not-jedi or troopers, it would be great.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Yeah Disney seems to think that if they're not constantly bombarding us with references to characters and stories we're nostalgic about, people will lose interest. Doesn't matter if the story is shit, if there's a Skywalker popping their head into the frame every few minutes saying "remember me?", people will love it.
Andor proves that all we want is a good fucking story.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

I hated the 2009 movie and Into Darkness, but Beyond was okay-ish.

(Apparently unlike you, I care about ridiculous plot holes so big they destroy the entire premise of Star Trek -- after all, (a) how is Starfleet anything but a farce if a mutinous cadet can be promoted straight to captain, (b) what's the point of starships if you can just beam between star systems, and (c) what's the point of any dramatic conflict if you can fuckin' cure death?!)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The third one was just…fine. Like I’m so ambivalent towards it, I don’t have any feeling about it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I was the same, can't remember it now but it was said to be the best by a lot of people.

Khan was a mockery because of the takeout and magic blood.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The worst part was that Khan was already "brownface" with Montalban playing him, but then they literally made him white.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not just white, but the whitest man on Earth with the most English name ever.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

You mean Burlington Coat-factory?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Right? I like Zachary Quinto as an actor, but that Spock was not Spock. And yes, I know, the Kelvin Event changed everything... so why not just invent new characters instead of shoehorning new personalities into beloved ones?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

Because JJ doesn't have original thoughts, but sure does love to pander to nostalgia!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

B/c like modern AI, it was more "cost-effective" to simply take the older ones, and do whatever they wanted with them, regardless of our consent.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (4 children)

And just as lazy.

Heaven forbid we have all original characters. We can't even have them in Disco and SNW and I like Disco and SNW... but Star Trek and Star Wars both have this Dickensian issue where every show has to be connected to every other show not just through the worldbuilding that has already been done, they actually have to share characters at least sometimes. As fun as crossovers can be, if they were even just kept to a bare minimum it would be nice.

They're doing a Starfleet Academy show next. I assume it will have Tilly in it. What if it had zero characters in common with any of the other shows except for the very occasional crossover or reference, and maybe never with any of the main casts of any of the other series?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Lost and Star Wars are unforgivable sins.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Early Lost was solid. Then, we got the other "others," they killed off the best character, and the ending everybody predicted (which was vehemently denied) totally happened.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (25 children)

Competent Director, and completely incompetent story teller. Just like Rian Johnson!

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oooh yes. it wasn't enough to lens flare any joy out of one of my beloved star franchises, you just had to snoke your way into two of them! If you lay hands on Stargate now as well, I'll go auldimately insane!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

If you lay hands on Stargate now as well

Wait, no. What?

Is this a thing that's been talked about?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

The problem is he makes decent-to-good original films then slaps a thin veneer of franchise on it. Zero respect for what he's actually making a movie of.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago

His constant hurling of "mystery boxes" at us was annoying enough. Things like Luke's lightsaber and Maz Kanata's "that is a story for another time"... really? REALLY? Abrams had no backstory for this, at all, he just threw it in there as a fetishistic compulsion, along with so many other things. Which is why none of his stories land in the end.

Speaking of which, then there's his ending TFA in the middle of a scene, as if this was an episode of "Lost" and stay tuned for next week's installment, same Bat-time, same Bat-channel.

But the clincher for me is the completely lazy disregard for science and how science works. Instead of doing the homework to at least try to approximate reality, he just did whatever got him to the next page of the saccharine script, to put whatever characters together because it was convenient for him.

In the process of all this, he made the galaxy feel small and flat, instead of vast and grandiose.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

We as a culture need to realize that JJ Abrams is just a less edgy Michael Bay.

They both take beloved franchises and do everything they can to kill any interest the old fans have while failing to make something new and interesting for the younger fans. Then they fall back on the aesthetic of the old parts of the franchise, without any of the charm, and keep the same story structure and bad jokes as their new version of the franchise.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'm conflicted with Abrams. I actually liked The Force Awakens and thought it had alot of potential (despite the seemingly unoriginal story), though JJ Abrams seems to have a history of starting things he can't seem to finish on his own. Last Jedi went off the rails and Rise of Skywalker was just trash. I just want to know who the hell in Disney thought it was a good idea to move ahead with the Sequel trilogy without a clear story or plan on how to proceed with the trilogy? Ultimately Kathleen Kennedy greenlit that shit, so I think she's to blame, but how in the hell does one of the biggest entertainment companies on the planet agree to something like that without it being worked out in advance. At a time when some movie series were getting filmed back-to-back-to-back, how in the hell did they not have a cohesive story figured out beforehand?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Fringe started amazing, then hit the wall fucking hard in the final season. Classic Abrams. Even he didn't know what was really going on and when he had to start explaining shit it fell apart in a right hurry. See Lost for further examples.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I honestly don't mind his movies. Movie Trek has always been action for the most part anyways and, also, would kind of fuck up the characters. Hell First Contact turned Picard into a mentally unhinged action hero.

Also I still say Kirk being a rocker fucking fits yo.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Also I still say Kirk being a rocker fucking fits yo.

Except that it's like calling you a rocker because you listen to Vivaldi. Star Trek used to pretend music ended with classical. Then J.J. decided to pretend it ended with the Beastie Boys.

Now don't get me wrong, I like the Beastie Boys and Sabotage is a terrific song... but it would be a weird quirk like Alex listening to Beethoven in A Clockwork Orange, not a sign that he's a rockin' rebel.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Movie Trek has always been action for the most part anyways

The Motion Picture and The Voyage Home.

...and, also, would kind of fuck up the characters. Hell First Contact turned Picard into a mentally unhinged action hero.

Picard always had that possibility inside him. After all, that sort of behavior is why he had an artificial heart. I thought that scene in First Contact worked amazingly well, TBH.

(If anything, the unrealistic portrayal of Picard is how he was immediately mostly back to normal after The Best of Both Worlds, as if it never even happened.)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›