I decided to check as yous call it "natopedia" to find out what nato thinks of this
All I can conclude is that the actual page for penises is much longer than the page on vaginals. I think I discovered the two most bonkers wp pages.
I decided to check as yous call it "natopedia" to find out what nato thinks of this
All I can conclude is that the actual page for penises is much longer than the page on vaginals. I think I discovered the two most bonkers wp pages.
lolololololol
if Q can't be a huge troll with a huge D than
trot groups in england were very heavily infiltrated by cops for decades as were others in the west. Search "swp" in the Undercover Policing Inquiry published evidence
there was a zine I read years and years ago that explained how (and maybe why) trots love making front groups to ruin every little progressive project. It was before all this infiltration stuff came out but when it did, everything made sense. The title was "monopolize resistance" I can't find it online.
Being so heavily infiltrated that the organization is basically run by the feds doesn't indicate some kind of inherent danger posed towards the state. It suggests that the organic membership are fools.
UK SWP was used for 20 years by the cops as a base from which to attack left-types. https://www.spycops.co.uk https://www.ucpi.org.uk/ International Socialists/Socialist Workers Party Archives - Undercover Policing Inquiry
Why people don't like trots is because they are often associated with personal and organizational ruin due to being agents of capital.
I want to learn to drive + get a license because
but
what do you think
I had an n of 346.
included and excluded
[he/him, comrade/them]
= he
, [she/her, they/them]
= she
method
Test string
text boxFunction
> List
Regular expression
field (above Test string
), paste: /^(\w+) \[(\w+).*\](.*\n.*\n+)(no|yes|maybe)/gim
List
field, (below Test string
), paste $1;$2;$4;\n
;
(semi colon) as column delimiter (used semicolon instead of ,
(comma) for compatibility when scraping all 4 pronouns)expected output is like this:
useruseruser1;he;Yes;
useruseruser2;he;No;
useruseruser3;he;no;
useruseruser4;she;Yes;
useruseruser5;he;No;
List
text box into a text file results.csv
and saveSet up spreadsheet
notepad.exe
on windows) to create a plain text file called template.csv
"number","UID","pron","ans","concat","pron count","pron count %","ans count","ans count %","cat count","cat count %","keep","n"
"=RANDBETWEEN.NV(10000,99999)",,,,"=CONCAT(C2,""-"",D2)","=COUNTIF(C:C,C2)","=ROUND(F2/$M2,3)*100","=COUNTIF(D:D,D2)","=ROUND(H2/$M2,3)*100","=COUNTIF(E:E,E2)","=ROUND(J2/$M2,3)*100",1,"=COUNTIF(L:L,1)"
File
> Open
and select template.csv
It should open the text import dialogue. Important settings:
Separated by
: comma
(uncheck the others)String delimiter
: "
(double quotation marks)Other options
: CHECK Evaluate formulas
File
> Save As
to save it as ODS
format which allows more features compared to csv
. I name this file combined.ods
.Open results
File
> Open
and select results.csv
. It should open the text import dialogue. Important settings:
Separated by
: semicolon
(uncheck the others) note this is different than the previous step!!Put results in template
combined.ods
B2
(blank under column heading UID
B
, C
, D
n
(the last column, actually it is column number M
) so that each value is 1
. by default it will start to count so the values will because 1
, 2
, 3
etc. Should be 1
,1
,1
.
0
it will be excluded. So you can keep data you want to exclude in the sheet.Now you must know how to use a spreadsheet. I suggest fixing all the answers to be the same case otherwise Yes
and yes
might be different in some circumstances.
Briefly the columns are:
-A
: number
: assigns a random number so the file can be shared without publishing usernames - anonymizes data but lets you keep a record of how you got the results. How to:
UID
number
(otherwise results will still be in the order as on the page and it might be possible to infer information)B
: UID
: user nameC
: pron
: first pronounD
: ans
: the answer provided
-E
: concat
: combines columns C
and D
. Expected output like she-Yes
. This is respresented in "Pronoun answer combinations"
-F
: pron count
, H
: ans count
, J
: cat count
: absolute number of each
-G
: pron count %
, I
: ans count %
, K
: cat count %: the
count value of each as a % of *
n* -
L:
keep: whether to include this line (explained elsewhere) -
M:
n`: total number of included rowsmethod variation: to capture all 4 pronouns
as above except:
Regular expression
field (above Test string
), paste: /^(\w+) \[(.*)\](.*\n.*\n+)(no|yes|maybe|deleted)/gim
expected output is like this:
useruseruser1;he/him, they/them;Yes;
useruseruser2;he/him;No;
useruseruser3;he/him, des/pair;no;
useruseruse4r;she/her;Yes;
useruseruser5;he/him;No;
RESULTS
For some reason the markdown tables are black text on black text dark grey background on my computer. I can't seem to fix that it's a problem with the website theme. Idk I'm tired of this by now.
table: total answer %
ans count % | ans |
---|---|
46.8% | No |
43.9% | Yes |
9.2% | Maybe |
csv: total answer %
percent,answer
46.8%,No
43.9%,Yes
9.2%,Maybe
table: Pronoun answer combinations %
percent | pronoun | answer |
---|---|---|
35.8% | he | No |
25.1% | she | Yes |
7.5% | they | Yes |
4.3% | comrade | No |
3.5% | none | No |
3.2% | he | Maybe |
3.2% | any | Maybe |
2.9% | comrade | Yes |
2.6% | he | Yes |
2.3% | any | Yes |
1.7% | any | No |
0.9% | they | No |
0.9% | it | Yes |
0.9% | fae | Yes |
0.6% | they | Maybe |
0.6% | she | No |
0.6% | she | Maybe |
0.6% | none | Yes |
0.6% | comrade | Maybe |
0.3% | ze | Yes |
0.3% | xey | Yes |
0.3% | undecided | Maybe |
0.3% | none | Maybe |
0.3% | love | Yes |
0.3% | fae | Maybe |
0.3% | e | Yes |
0.3% | e | Maybe |
csv: Pronoun answer combinations %
percent,pronoun,answer
35.8%,he,No
25.1%,she,Yes
7.5%,they,Yes
4.3%,comrade,No
3.5%,none,No
3.2%,he,Maybe
3.2%,any,Maybe
2.9%,comrade,Yes
2.6%,he,Yes
2.3%,any,Yes
1.7%,any,No
0.9%,they,No
0.9%,it,Yes
0.9%,fae,Yes
0.6%,they,Maybe
0.6%,she,No
0.6%,she,Maybe
0.6%,none,Yes
0.6%,comrade,Maybe
0.3%,ze,Yes
0.3%,xey,Yes
0.3%,undecided,Maybe
0.3%,none,Maybe
0.3%,love,Yes
0.3%,fae,Maybe
0.3%,e,Yes
0.3%,e,Maybe
table: Pronoun answer %
pron count % | pron |
---|---|
41.6% | he |
26.3% | she |
9% | they |
7.8% | comrade |
7.2% | any |
4.3% | none |
1.2% | fae |
0.9% | it |
0.6% | e |
0.3% | ze |
0.3% | xey |
0.3% | undecided |
0.3% | love |
csv: Pronoun answer %
percent,pronoun
41.6%,he
26.3%,she
9%,they
7.8%,comrade
7.2%,any
4.3%,none
1.2%,fae
0.9%,it
0.6%,e
0.3%,ze
0.3%,xey
0.3%,undecided
0.3%,love
Here is a link to the original thread for posterity: Informal Site Survey: Are you transgender or gender diverse? Yes, no, or maybe?
I appreciate the guts here. Just fucking go for it. Push the limits. I've done it in different contexts, sometimes it works somewhat and sometimes you get fucked. But if you can, you should. Make them fucking work. Especially if you aren't already tied up in collective class conflict. And sometimes, when you are.
OTOH in the realm of "legal precedence" there is a big risk because where we're concerned while a victory of one isn't a triumph to all, an injury to one is a defeat for all. Particularly when embarking on "test cases." (Not sure if this was intended to be, or ended up being, a test case? Maybe nothing new happened here other than some attention.)
Ultimately anything good always comes from the organized power of the working class.
I just searched for this game and the first thing I see at https://openmw.org/ seems to be saying they are moving away from open source? In app ads, fees, marketplace and telemetry (if you live outside california or the EU where presumably regulations prohibit it).
edit it was posted april 1st is it some sort of joke
Molesting children .... to maintain capitalism
infiltrate organizations that threaten capital
infiltrate pedo communities
So does it maintain capital or threaten capital?
And if it maintains capitalism because of kompromat, then does being open about it thwart the whole plan?
"it worked great for steve jobs!"
I have the impression that the pro-neanderthal sentiment can be a thin end of a racist wedge.
Here is a map from wikipedia captioned "Known Neanderthal range in Europe (blue), Southwest Asia (orange), Uzbekistan (green), and the Altai Mountains (violet) ":
So look at that and think, "what would a racist see". Don't be to cute about it.
With neanderthals being actually pretty smart and cool, they can be seen to contribute that certain je ne sais quoi to white people that makes them actually biologically distinct from other humans. Which is of course a closed question (FAKE) generally speaking.
I'm not saying that's true and I'm not saying anyone here is saying it. I'm just saying that there could be some motivated reasoning.