"HEY, I’M LOOKING FOR [hidden network name]"
Client devices can also do this all the time even when not in range, which basically broadcasts they're looking for that network everywhere they go. That's just asking for someone to setup a rogue access point.
Just give all the kids a few nukes.
If Mutually Assured Destruction works for international relations, surely this works for schools.
I know, I know... but I'll still try to chuck the amulet like chucking a ring in Mount Doom, just in case this ever gets implemented.
Level 26 has a black background, but they're mechanically walls and not a pit where you can fall or throw the amulet... maybe some day...
Cold pizza breakfast hits in all the right spots.
Yea, I think it was blocked even before our time. Anyway, if it's no longer a spamfest, then sure it makes sense to unblock them.
“GIVE US ALL YOUR MONEY NOW OR WE ARE DRIVING YOU OFF THE GRAND CANYON"
Can I just skip straight to this part?
Probably something for @[email protected]
Why’d you delete your post then?
@[email protected] has no posts here on lemmy, deleted or not.
Did you realize doxxing people is illegal?
It can't be doxxing if someone puts their own damn name in the public domain by themselves.
That's about as ridiculous as accusing someone of doxing for saying that @elonmusk is... Elon Musk, it's literally written out there by their own selves.
No idea who's Shane or Jen, or why anyone's hands looking like anything would be relevant.
This whole comment is really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like.
Who?
Sorry, I vaguely know about the photoshop abusing hypocrit narcissist chick, but not about this fella.
Sweet dreams are made of wheat 🎶
Thanks, that's an interesting read.
I know that's one person's opinion and not a thorough research, but that's still plenty of red flags.
I've used the 100 searches in the free trial, thought the search was fine, better than Google's these days. The subscription is a bit steep so I held off, kinda glad I did after digging more into this.
Having what little employees they have also make a mac-only browser, AI stuff and email that their user base doesn't seem to want is all a bit weird.
Buying a t-shirt factory (wtf) with the money they could have used to potentially lower the subscription, but decided to burn through it to give out free t-shirts. That just screams narcissism-driven to me.
Their vague statements on privacy isn't convincing at all.
Some variation of "we don't care about your data" isn't in any way compelling evidence that you care about protecting the privacy of said collected data.
In my opinion they lack focus, commitment and conviction into what I thought was their primary mission at first glance: being a privacy-focused no nonsense search engine.
Although that's probably on me for reading what I wanted to see between the lines and that never was their stated mission, which would explain a lot.
What if I'm happy, but still want to reject cookies?
What if I'm not happy, but also don't want to manage cookies?
theguardian's banner truth table:
| Happy | Cookies | output |
|
|
|
| | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Is happiness a choice?
It's rare but it happens.
Mine was a stun trap