Engywuck

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Drama and pitchforks over nothing, as usual.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Just did exactly that in a recently accepted paper. A comments from a reviewer made us notice that a certain phenomenon was greatly exaggerated by low-res theoretical calculations and that it actually was barely noticeable. I just added "weakly" to the paragraph describing that phenomenon. Won't delete shit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

We used to intentionally add wrong data to our datasets so we could circle it afterwards, declare it "outlying data" and gain the extra points for spotting and documenting it.

Nice trick!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well, some students of mines actually put some figure like that in al lab report...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

You're not entirely wrong...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Agreed. Not much more expensive than a VPS and saves you a lot of headaches.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

You don't need uBO that if your browser has a capable adblocker. It's been 3 years without uBO for me and I have seen exactly 0 ads.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

I am lucky enough to have more than a couple of these friends, from decades ago :-)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Brave+self-hosted SearXNG

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not this with built-in adblockers, despite someone's wishes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I was talking about AdGuard, not AdGuard Home.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

AdGuard is not a DNS blocker

view more: ‹ prev next ›