Put it in rice overnight. It will attract asian people who will fix it right up.
For real though, don't put it in rice. Small rice particles can get stuck in your device and cause damage.
I probably change the brightness setting the most. Why is it all the way at the top of the settings, the furthest out of reach it could be?
Except in the cases where it explicitly does.
Unless you can come up with a better translation, you're not offering critique, just you're just sowing doubt without backing evidence.
I find it highly unlikely there's an alternative translation here that we'd consider morally okay to say.
Android can be degoogled, e.g. GrapheneOS. If you're focused on privacy then that's the way to go.
Although Google is worse than Apple when it comes to privacy, Apple is still pretty bad.
Plenty of predictive models showed Clinton having a 60% chance of winning, almost a toss-up. Trump overperformed, but not by much, and his EC win looks significantly larger on paper than it does when comparing state vote counts.
Polls usually are pretty accurate. Election pundits howeverrrr...
Looking out of windows is clearly a terrorist act.
697? Geez that's... Not great.
That's what I do, I dismiss the claim. But just because their claim doesn't make sense to me I won't assume they are wrong.
If you still assume that the claim might have merit, you explicitly haven't dismissed the claim. You may not live like it might be true, but if you don't assume it's wrong either you haven't really dismissed it.
If something doesn't make sense to me, doesn't mean that thing doesn't make sense. If something makes sense to me, it doesn't mean it makes sense.
You don't have to consider all things you do not understand to be false. You have to ask yourself if something could be true. This involves a number of subquestions, one of which might be "does this make sense to me", but it doesn't have to be the defining factor. Quantum mechanics doesn't make a whole lot of sense to most people, but you don't see a mass rejection of QM for that reason.
I just feel my place in the universe is pretty far away from absolute truths. I prefer the humble route of just saying "I just don't really know, do I'd rather not believe based on emotions or shallow perceptions".
You might argue humble, I might argue a sense of naivety. There's a whole lot of things we can say about the universe with pretty absolute certainty. For the concept of god, we have about zero reasons to assume he exists and a whole lot of reasons why he probably doesn't. In that situation I can't in good conscience maintain the position that science is wrong about everything and god does exist. The dismissal of evidence pointing towards the absense of a god comes across to me as arrogance rather than humility, though I'm fairly certain that's not where your position comes from.
Did you try the thought experiment? What things do you know? What constitutes the line of knowing vs believing for you? Would you believe that an alien version of RuPaul could be at the center of the moon, because we haven't checked there? Would you consider it even possible or would you dismiss the claim? And if you dismiss it, what makes this claim truly any different from the claim that god might exist?
Otto has been very vocal and active in getting his daughter's diary published and getting her story told. It's far more likely he dragged himself there.
It's slightly cheaper for developers to put their games on there. But that sucks as a business model, because game prices aren't any lower so for the end user it doesn't matter. And on features, Epic just loses every matchup against Steam.
Here's an article with some examples: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/gaza-nakba-israels-far-right-palestinian-fears-hamas-war-rcna123909
Examples include:
The EU has even been considering sanctioning some of these ministers for hate speech. So please, try and keep up.