Azal

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Strange that politics who call for deregulation never deregulate useful things.

Funny that right? Those that call for deregulation would probably call for deregulating the legal time frame that a company has to support their devices.

And as to what we did with ours, effectively trash. We have a medical junk guy who comes through yearly and picks up the stuff thats getting thrown out, he parts pieces out he can sell, sells scrap otherwise, etc. Also sells a lot of equipment to smaller hospitals out in rural that will make do, and a lot of stuff we have goes to Project Cure which sends medical devices out of country to places in need. The funny part about the rural hospitals and Project Cure is... neither of those can happen because, as I said earlier, can't verify their accuracy anymore so for my hospital, about 30 units of trash in one day.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I work as a biomed, our hospital had to buy completely new sets of a type of ultrasound machine we have. Why?

Because in order to do the yearly preventative maintenance you have to go through the manufacturers program to test calibration. They stopped supporting it this year and shut it down. Legit these machines were working just fine, but now in order to keep up with verifying accuracy they're essentially bricked. They did it on the exact day they hit the year mark that they legally were required to support in order to sell medical grade equipment passed.

This is only going to get worse, not better.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How to fix: Bloody revolution, that’s about it.

I disagree with this. It'll take some revolution, but can be avoided bloody.

On revolution I do say vote. The 2022 election was a turnout of 52% of the voting age population. Just barely over half, and that's the second highest turnout to a nonpresidential election year since 2000. All the oxygen always goes to the Presidency but what OP is dealing with comes up in local elections, and the local and state shit deals far more with your day to day than the national. Hell, when national laws even come up, weed is still schedule 1 "more dangerous than cocaine" to the federal government but just about every state has legalized it.

It's not a quick solution, and it's not as simple anymore as "go out and vote" but gotta kick everyone up who hasn't given a shit (if they're not voting, think they'll back you in a revolution?). It's a fucking slow ass slog that takes daily fighting, like I've got a group that I'm the one who posts the ballots, the dates, the links, honestly do everything but bang on their doors and drag them to the polls but it's a little bit that helps. As I saw "A vote is not a valentine. You're not professing your love for the candidate. It's a chess move for the world you want to live in."

The Republicans have been doing that for years, they've never let a single dem run even for superintendent across the country uncontested. They worked slow and methodically to get the supreme court. Their revolution can be argued to have started as far back as Nixon. We're arguably at their end game, but it seems like they've overreached this time, it's time to start clawing back territory.

The reason though I'm against a bloody revolution is, yes it's useful as a last resort, but it honestly is at that in the chess analogy above picking up the table, throwing it in the room and starting a riot. You hope you come out okay but at that point it's really up in the air who comes out on top. Guillotines come up a lot, and France is doing pretty well right now. But remember between modern France and the guillotines was a messy time post revolution that was stabilized by someone who declared himself Emperor and attempted to conquer all of Europe.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Remember 2016 when the media gave Trump an absurd amount of free publicity by covering every stupid thing he said and did then he won? It wasn’t the only reason, but it clearly didn’t help.

2016? Shit the press gave him all the free press when he was doing the birther shit with Obama.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Or how about the part where all their chicken’s bland as shit. “Spicy” my ass.

Popeyes is the superior chicken fast food. I'll fight anyone on this hill.

I've had practice eating at Popeyes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean 2 parts. 1: Ukraine is fighting off a bigger countries tanks with Molotovs.

2: Logistics, supplies, etc is a HELL of a fight in two directions and the US has a hell of a home field advantage. If someone (I'm going to say from the Asian continent for this argument) any supplies they want has to cross the ocean. Then right now unless we do something to massively piss them off, we've got allies to the north and south so no country is giving a foothold next door (This is why South Korea and Japan being allies is important to the US, and why China really likes North Korea being there. So far the only foothold the biggest enemies to the US can get is Cuba... which right now involves circling the globe the even longer way).

But now our hypothetical military force has beaten back the US navy which is filling the oceans with all sorts of attacks, they get to the shores where they contend with the US Coast Guard, the US's second navy. That gets beaten back, and now the land war has started. Lets say they take LA and that's where the invasion is starting.

"Defeating" the US Military is truly a defeat of the US because now it's a home front war. You'll have the US military fighting on US soil, which I think the last time that happened was the civil war (correct me if I'm wrong), the Reserves are getting called in. Then even before you get to the "random guys with guns" the actual US militia gets mobilized where the National Guards of each state is called in. And you better believe they'll definitely take their gun nutty neighbors in this because the national guard works day to day in civilian world.

So now we've gotten to logistics. The US likes to beat its chest when it comes to military, but the true might of the US in history has been logistics of "We need x here today" and we can ship troops to the other side of the globe faster than Amazon can deliver a package to a doorstep in country. The US has a robust interstate system, designed after the autobahn of Germany for the same purpose, moving hardware. So whatever military is fighting now has to contend with whatever front line is existing getting supplied by the factories in the middle of the country with semis running supplies daily as well as military hardware from the side of the country not getting attacked at the moment (I live near multiple military bases that's as far from any border as one can logically get, where there's tank divisions just waiting).

But we're calling a defeat scenario for the US, so the hypothetical beats back the US military, who's probably tearing apart the infrastructure as it backs up if it's smart and plays like the Russians do. Granted the US doesn't have a Russian Winter, but if you're coming from the West you have the Rockies, coming from the East you have the Appalachians. Mountain ranges that makes mobilization difficult if the infrastructure is fucked, but the infrastructure is fine on the other side.

I legit cannot imagine a country, even the US, with the infrastructure to break through that wall scenario delivering hardware across the world.

But hey, we don't have to talk a complete invasion of the US. Just some area. Remember, many US states are as big as countries, especially the western ones. So an invasion happens, now you're dealing with large swaths of territory. Russia had trouble with the Finns in the Winter War, with Russia being right next door because the Finns didn't just up and fight the major people. No they'd let tank battalions pass, then when the logistics crew following the battalions showed up they'd get sniped. Or the US tried to fight in Vietnam and were beaten back by civilians. Or occupied Afghanistan and ultimately the Taliban managed to regain control. Occupation is REALLY hard because even for a small territory you have to have a large soldier to civilian ratio for those "military grade" weapons and tactics to beat civilians (the difference between a "military grade" AR-15 and a civilian one is the ability to turn it to fully automatic. That is something that modifications exist to do.) And if an invasion is coming I guarantee you every Scheels, Bass Pro, Cabelas, Academy Sports, and every mom and pop gun store will be having a fire sale on ammunition.

TLDR: It would be a logistical hurdle to even shut down US military bases before reaching one of the mountain ranges, while the US would be sitting in its logistics hub. Invading forces only really truly succeed historically long term when the civilians are on the side of the invaders because occupying long term is really hard, and I think you're underestimating the military logistics of a country that has ammunition vending machines.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And while the Navy is brought up, lets not forget the Coast Guard.

While the Coast Guard is joked about as dollar store Navy, it's a legit military service that has been actively at war against drug smugglers past few years, but gets sent over in previous wars to fight in riverways. This gives the US navy the entire pacific to fight against Russia, and when they do get to the US, there's a second home based one under a completely different administration to fight at the shores.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

From the US and I pay a lot of attention to politics.

Her past is she was a bulldog in the courtroom, absolutely a firebrand and ready to take on anyone. By making her VP, her job was mostly to not make the administration look bad, which is a tough job for a firebrand so for years it felt like she was put in the back and kept quiet.

Roe v Wade decision happened, making the abortion argument on the side of the Republicans getting what they wanted, Biden is a Catholic and male so completely uncomfortable using the fact that abortion is the winning ticket item for the Dems so Harris has been beating that drum hard and getting out. GRANTED the media has been focusing on "Biden too old!" (Legit had to learn a Biden policy from BBC because American news isn't going to talk about that) so she's still feeling a relative unknown to the country at large.

There are people calling for wanting the DNC to do a vote, but we're past that marker, there's people disappointed, and then there's a lot of people excited. Right now this election is going to shape up to be more "interesting" than Bush v Gore or Trump v Hillary.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

I'd get a block of houses, not mansions, just 6 small houses where the backyards are all together and make that into a little community where I can get the people I'm closest to into an area with a shared community space in the backyards. That's my expensive one.

Rav4 hybrid. I just want a fuel efficient car I can go camping in.

Set up a trust to make sure that I don't have to work if I don't want to, get to retire.

Then the rest... I'm stuck between which is better, dumping it into becoming a non-profit to get as many homeless people housed as possible, or build into a superpac specifically meant to bring down Citizens United.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

At this point there's a con happening all over the country all throughout the year. Dunno where "south" is for you but the big one I know about is Texas Furry Fiesta in Dallas in March.

Granted Texas has like 4 of them going nowadays by itself lol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I have the aftershockz Air. Aftershockz as a company apparently changed and went to Shockz when I got my second set so there I got the openrun. I still find my using the Air for my work time which is my more used one, but I think I got used to the fit of it (ran with those for like 3 years) but the openrun works pretty well IMO.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'll toss in as I have two, a set at home and at work.

For music, they're honestly kinda meh. They'll get the job done if you want some music but lets be frank you'll find better sound quality headphones out there.

The reason I absolutely find them game changers is they allow me to wear them when I'm at work. I work on mechanical equipment in hospitals, so I need to hear what's going on around me, one earbud can block up a side but this means I can hear when someone is talking to me. Also I found that earbuds didn't fit me well so would potentially fall out, these wrap around the back of the head and stay in place, even when I'm working in some strange positions. And when I'm pulling out the power tools and things are going to be loud, I stick in earplugs, and I can hear what I'm listening to better even.

Phone work, I was shocked because my last job I was in a cargo van with minimal insulation so A LOT of road noise, but I'd hear the person I'm talking to with little issue and they could hear me well. Makes hands free phones a lot better.

I listen to podcasts, audiobooks, and the like. I mean chew through so many of them it's not even funny. Because of that sometimes I found with the single earbud one you'd have something in stereo, well that single earbud messes it up and you gotta set it to a mono sound. These you've got that dynamic sound going.

So in short, if you're going for audiophile level stuff, pass on these, but for daily drivers in day to day life they're on the top ten things I've ever bought.

8
Soon (pawb.social)
 
view more: next ›