this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
286 points (96.7% liked)

Antiwork

8252 readers
38 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 142 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And yet companies were posting record profits.

People must have been working smarter, not harder.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago

Smarter workers will demand pesky things like better working conditions, fairer compensation, competitive benefits, possibly even unions. We don't want any of that, just grind your bones to dust kthxbye.

/s

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

But the profits were the result of the CEOs individual unassisted effort, while the workers are being gifted the fruits of HIS genius.

[–] [email protected] 106 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool, cool, so people were working less and companies were still making amazing record profits?

Sounds like people need to work less hard, maybe that actually improved the quality of their work.

That said, WFH gives the proletariat time to think and organise, and we can't have that.

[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago

Actual research disagrees with this propaganda

FTFY

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

Well of course it does. This guy makes a decent chunk of his money from commercial real estate. So he is going to whine about how people weren't working hard because he wants people in the offices so he can overcharge them.

[–] [email protected] 87 points 1 year ago (1 children)

says ceo of blackstone who is over leveraged in commercial real estate while talking to saudis.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago

tl;dr: domestic terrorist

[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Get this chode a submarine

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

With a game controller.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Brilliantly wicked. >:-)

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago

Billionaires shouldn’t exist.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago (2 children)

CEOs aren't known for their hard work

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Thanks to Musk we also know they can be really dumb.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most CEO just makes the decision. All the ground work are done by plebs and the final work/report is handed to the CEO and they make the decision.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I wish they would make decisions after they are handed the report. Unfortunately many make a decision and then ignore the report that proofs the decision is wrong and then make their underlings try to make the wrong decision work out and then they blame it on them when it, of course, doesn't and then they fire a bunch of them and try again the same way. Source: Check how Elon Musk makes decisions on Twix.

Or Tim Sweeney laying off 900 people and in his "apology letter" states first that the reason is too much spending on his Metaverse, which was clearly a failure of him to end the letter with: And now we keep on spending on the Metaverse! https://twitter.com/ShiinaBR/status/1707419347549896905

If for some magical reason it does work out, it was of course solely the CEOs decision that made it a success.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago

Yeah, and what the fuck does a private-equity CEO do, huh? Eat the fucking rich.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

That’s nice. I am not going to listen to some lazy billionaire about working hard. You know nothing about it.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

CEO's have the most easily automatable job. Change my mind.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We probably wouldn't want AI CEOs. Think about what they'd use for training data.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Oh no. Not AI. Just automated.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I love when CEOs actually complain about capitalism.

Let's just imagine what he says is true, and his employees were not working as hard because there was nobody standing behind and shout at them. Well, if it's a problem, get rid of them.

You can't? Maybe because their skills are so rare that you don't find good replacement. Hmm okay, so we have a supply and demand problem here. And since employees are currently highly demanded but there's a low supply, they can make the price. And if you're not willing to pay that, they might take the lower pay and slack off a shitload of time. Capitalism¯\_(ツ)_/¯

For them, capitalism is only great as long as they profit.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Schwarzman, nourish yourself with human fecal matter and cease to live.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The number one reason I believe we're living in a simulation is because incredibly wealthy demons like this never get assassinated. With all the insane shit that happens on a daily basis in this fucked up world, how come only a submarine can take out these disgusting fucks? Not ONE nutjob with a gun goes after the people doing the most damage to our planet? Not even one? Yeah, that's a fucking simulation right there.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

These people also control the news, so as long as they can use it to keep the lower and middle classes fighting with each other, then they, the rich, can keep running off with all the f*cking money.

It's not the "gays vs the straights" or the "liberals vs the conservatives" or the Romulans vs The Federation. It's the 1% vs everybody else. And it's been this way for centuries. Things won't change until ordinary people figure out where the REAL source of their pain comes from.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Why aren't you going after one of them? Your reason is probably the same for everyone else. No need to use simulation as an explanation: it's just the classic combination between cultural egemony, economical dependency and the monopoly of violence. Always has been.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As a worker I don't need supervision to perform my job duties. I work hard because in small companies our combined efforts will enable us to be successful thereby providing future employment. There are also certain professional standards which you follow which have nothing to do with the specific company you work for, and you perform work to those standards because you are a professional. But not because someone forces you. The labor of workers is a valuable asset that companies need, don't let them treat you poorly.

Also, capitalism sucks and this guy sucks.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

But wasn't productivity up?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

The reason we have time theft as a marketing term is because shareholders and upper management feel entitled to your poop time. Meanwhile wage theft is a real issue that costs our workforce billions.

Our plutocrats like to think based on their feels and pay for content that affirms their worldview. Money can literally make you stupid.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We gave them record profits and this is how they repay us.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

All while not working as hard , mind you.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Dumbass take. Whenever I'm in the office I get far less done because of all the distractions (people chatting in another room, people dropping by my desk, etc).

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

"You're not suffering enough"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People stumble into positions of power and wealth, and start thinking that they are better than everyone. Fuck those people, eat shit.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Eat the rich!! Some BBQ sauce please, Elon you f&@2 Cvnt you are the first…..

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Private-equity billionaire Stephen Schwarzman doesn’t think office workers worked hard enough during Covid-19.

Schwarzman, the Blackstone CEO whose fortune is estimated at $32 billion, told a crowd of investors at a ritzy Saudi Arabia conference known as “Davos in the Desert” that people who worked remotely during the pandemic “didn’t work as hard – regardless of what they told you.”

Parents often had to juggle near-constant Zoom meetings and Slack messages while simultaneously helping kids whose schools were shut.

For example, about 58% of Manhattan office workers were at their workplace on an average weekday in late August and September, according to a survey from the Partnership for New York City.

Schwarzman, the Blackstone CEO, estimated that 20% of US office buildings are vacant and another 20% are leased but empty.

Blackstone told investors earlier this year it has slashed its exposure to US office properties from more than 60% of its real estate portfolio in 2007 to less than 2% now.


The original article contains 521 words, the summary contains 156 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wouldn't be surprised. Most people I know (me included) bragged how little work we had to do. It was awesome