447
Belt organizer (lemmy.world)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 26 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Nifty! But I only have 2 belts...

[-] [email protected] 38 points 11 months ago

Clearly you need to buy more belts to fill out your new belt organizer

[-] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago

And don't forget to buy them in pairs so that the organizer remains balanced.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

What happens when you wear one?

[-] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Good point.

Gotta wear them in pairs, for the balance, obviously.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Tetsuya Nomura approves.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

My wife bought me a 6-slot watch box last year when I only owned two watches...

Obviously, I had to fill it up.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

What if you have only one belt

[-] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

What if you have an uneven number of belts because you take one or put one away? It would be very instable and would tilt without the same weight front and back.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's my thoughts too.

This is just a suggestion, not a knock or anything against the poster. But a solution I think could work is to rotate the hook 90 degrees and have 2 of them, one at each end. Then it would remain flat and balanced no matter where the belts are on the rack.

Not a perfect solution, you wont see or have access to the belts at the back and the mount takes up more space on the rail. But at least you aren't playing a balancing game each time you take a belt.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I think I'd hang the hook off the end, so that the belts are stored in a vertical tree (slightly sloped, so that they don't fall over each other.) But that's an entirely new redesign for something that only really matters if you care about it.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

There's a little bit of movement but it's not too annoying. When loaded up with belts, taking one off doesn't make a big difference.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Just leave the empty gap in the middle? Come on Sam, we've got to work together on stuff like this!

[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Buy a decoy belt that only gets used when you're wearing one of the real belts. The decoy belt can get a wall mounted hook so it's out of the way when no belts are being warn.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

What's the solution for plaque buckles?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

My personal solution was to not own any. But I have thought about it. Maybe a slot on both ends of the body to slide the knob of the buckle into. That would allow for two belts pretty easily.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Had to google this. Are these common? I personally think they’re not very good looking.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Common? Not sure. They're available at standard shops. I have had one for 20 years that I picked up in highschool from American Eagle for $34.50. Why is that etched in my brain? I was specifically looking for one at the time.

I prefer the look (as long as it's simple) and function.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

I bought a tie hanger with hooks. It lets me hang up my four belts and ~10 ties (that I’ve never worn again since the rona). I’m usually in sweat pants and hardly use my belts anymore now that I think about it. Anyway, I really like it. Think this would have more Utility and use less material with just hooks.

Mine looks like this one

[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I have one that I absolutely despise. It has only one job and it tosses my belts to the floor...on purpose.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I would go with slopes instead of fillets, but nice anyway

[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Another reason for me to buy a 3d printer. Any tips on building one folks?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Buy an ender 3 if you're cheap and have plenty of tinker time. Buy something by Bambu if you have cash and want ease of use.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I'm more broke but want to get one anyway and I am between the technical and ease of use mode.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Try to go with something popular so you can find help when things inevitably go wrong. Expect to learn a lot when building. If you like that, awesome, do it. Otherwise you may want to consider a prebuilt prusa or bambu.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Ender, prusa, bambu are names that have popularity, longevity, and reputation.

You can find a ton of recommendations and best printer lists with a quick search. You would probably be fine with most printers on those lists if you wanted to save some money, but the above three are solid and give you a good budget range already.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

How much money do you want to put into a setup? With $1000, you an get any of the really good printers, a different size nozzle, a few little tools, and plenty of filament.

this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
447 points (97.3% liked)

3DPrinting

15282 readers
56 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: [email protected] or [email protected]

There are CAD communities available at: [email protected] or [email protected]

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS