this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
712 points (96.1% liked)

simpsonsshitposting

3042 readers
1029 users here now

I just think they're neat!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Duff CEO with a Windows-Logo on his forehead: "Gamers use Windows because of its' user experience not our de facto monopoly."

Next Image: Duff CEO with Windows-Logo in front of a "Out of Business" sign. Subtitle: "30 minutes after SteamOS is released"

Edit: Yo, I'm not saying this is gonna happen. I just want to say that Windew's UX sucks ass.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Most people just use what's in front of them. Apple takes on exorbitant costs to make sure marginalized people are the face of iphone. Microsoft takes on exorbitant costs to be the face of our soul crushing tech capitalism. What can linux represent and how can we leverage that to our advantage while taking down apple and Microsoft.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

Requisite "you don't need to wait for SteamOS" post.

Gamed on Linux for over 2 years. The time is now. Shit just works (mostly).

Edit: and yes, you can often get better performance on the same games with the same hardware.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago

Same experience here. People waiting for steamos don't know most good distros work how they think steamos is gonna. Games with kernel level anti cheat that are worth playing are few and far between. And fuck their communities for not rioting when their fellow members get removed from the game for no reason.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

you can often get better performance on the same games with the same hardware.

Because there's a reason why Linux does not randomly use the disk like Windows does

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Back when I was still on an HDD the difference between NTFS and ext4 was night and day.

I remember having the need to defragment my drive on windows every few months, or Batman Arkham Asylum would actually start to lag and stutter trying to load textures.

Meanwhile World of Warships, another texture heavy game, would load significantly faster when I tried it on Linux because surprise surpsise, ext4 doesn't fragment until your disk is nearly full.

Windows honestly gg ez'd it's way out of making a newer FS with the advent of SSDs, but there was a period of time where upgrading to Windows 8 would blow up your drive usage to 100% the entire time the PC was on.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago

NTFS is imo even worse than exFAT because at least exFAT didn't eat your disk alive

[–] [email protected] 5 points 23 hours ago

My whole family largely uses Linux as our daily driver - ages - 40, 38, 18, 9, 7

The only one not running Linux is my 38 year old wife.

HOWEVER - my 9 year old got an occulus for Xmas, and suddenly we are dual booting and that's a real shame.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At least we didn't have to look at goddamn Ads in the menu. Also the AI """integration""" fucked up things pretty badly. Sometime you just need a simple, light, OS to do your thing.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This is the main problem right now.

People want to return to a lighter simple Windows OS, but Microsoft is making that increasingly hard to access. The LTSC version of Windows 10 is close(No AI, No Ads, and minimal telemetry that can be disabled), but they dont sell it to the public unless you buy 5 copies, and ~~there is no LTSC version of Windows 11 yet.~~ looks like they finally released it a couple months back, but people are unhappy with it.

Linux offers an alternative, but compatibility is still a huge issue despite the impressive gains Wine and Proton have made in the last few years.

The reality is that if you have a Windows PC you can basically guarantee that you can install anything you might want(barring hardware limitations). You can often make that software work on Linux too, but there is always some tinkering involved and the general public doesn't want to deal with that, nor do they want to change to a FOSS alternative.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 22 hours ago (7 children)

What kind of apostrophe use is

its'

?!

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Always had windows. Never wanted Linux because I didn’t want to dick around with every game install. You give me an OS that lets me browse and game WITHOUT having to dick around with every application, and I’d switch in a heartbeat.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (17 children)

I can't even remember the last time I had to fuck around with a Steam game, all the ones I want to play just work

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago (8 children)

It's actually gotten a lot better over the last few years; Valve has been putting in a lot of work into making gaming "just work" through Steam. It's still a bit jank, but honestly all OSes are a bit jank.

If anyone in this thread is interested, I'd recommend giving Linux Mint a go. There's nothing really to lose.

Anyway, I'm done shilling Linux so I'll let you get back to your Simpsoning. :P

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

Steam on Linux already does exactly that. You hit play and that's it, exactly like on Windows. The rest is done for you automatically.

Tinkering might be required with a few non-Steam games and programs, but for the most part, they just work as well.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

And lets be honest, it is not as if tinkering isn't required for a lot of things on Windows too, it is just that the tinkering is a lot more random "hope & pray" stuff like uninstalling and reinstalling things, rebooting,... and hoping the problem goes away.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

What? No.

One of the best things about Windows is the incredible huge support on how to fix things.

Maybe not on the Windows forum, about Microsoft software. But every other software is not a problem. Because Windows has such a huge userbase, it would be weird if you encountered a bug that nobody has ever encountered before. And tons of techies already posted several solutions to it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

The first time you try Linux will have an initial learning curve. Just like the first time you tried Windows. But once you have everything set up the way you like and get used to it, you really won't find yourself having to troubleshoot very often. You certainly don't have to "dick around with every game install" either.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Who here wants a bathtub Mint distro?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (10 children)

I don't really understand this buzz about Steam OS displacing Windows.

Windows is a general purpose computer OS; whereas Steam OS is a game-platform OS designed for the Steam Deck and similar devices. It doesn't seem to be the same use case. Obviously Steam OS could be used as a general purpose OS, if you just switch modes and install this and that software... but then what are you waiting for? There are already heaps of high quality general purpose Linux OSs already designed for that purpose. Linux Mint is a drop-in replacement for Windows, and has no problems whatsoever with games.

I mean, if you want to use Steam OS on your main computer, then that's fine - but I just don't really see a reason to use that rather than something that is already available, and already a desktop OS rather than a console OS.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

Maybe some people only use their computers to play games? I don't know. I've been wondering as well. Pretty much any modern distribution works fine.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

I'm glad gaming has come so far but it still fuckin sucks. Waiting hours for shders to compile, all the bandwidth used to download those shaders. Then the game still runs like shit compared to windows.

Don't get me wrong. I still only use Linux and have for like 8 years. But that doesn't mean it's not shite. But I don't really game like I used to. My main issue is applications like Adobe and CAD software. We need that to support Linux

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If SteamOS is ever launched for non-valve hardware, I would probably stop whatever I'm doing at work to get it installed

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Copying my own comment from yesterday:

There was a comment thread in one of the Linux communities the other day talking about this mindset. Obviously the comments got a bit rude and unconstructive, but the point is that you can switch to something like bazzite now and most things will work pretty well, but if you're holding out until it's perfect then you'll be waiting forever!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Recall is the final straw for me. If there really is no way to permanently disable it then I'm going to have to get used to Linux/SteamOS. Which sucks because I really do seriously value things just working and not have to dig for hours to fix random issues with every little program I want to use. :/

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

Honestly, as someone comfortable with Linux already, but running Windows because of games, it was the last straw for me in a bigger way. A bunch of people up and down the chain at Microsoft thought recall was a good idea, and didn't need really basic safety features at launch. Not only is that very poor judgement, but what they think I want and need is so far disconnected from reality that following their upgrade path is a huge risk.

Maybe they'll put switches in to disable Recall, but maybe they'll want to take them away for my own good at some point in the future. Maybe they'll do so silently. I know there'll be an adjustment curve, but I'd rather be in control of it rather than let the people who thought Recall was a good idea updating my OS internals. I'll never install Windows 11 on a device I own, and I'm not holding my breath on future versions at this rate.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›