this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
697 points (97.7% liked)

Comic Strips

12933 readers
2581 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 53 minutes ago

That comic also represents 100% of all survival crafting games, plus Factorio

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 4 points 8 hours ago

That was not a subtle theme...

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Avatar is just recycled CGI Fern Gully anyway

[–] robinoberg@feddit.uk 2 points 8 hours ago

It's a motif as old as time. Foreign invader getting Stockholm Syndrome with the natives. Another famous example is Dances With Wolves. That film called The Great Wall as well. Some versions of Robin Hood has it. Anthropologists call it Going Native, which is what Carlos Castañeda did.

But they're not all about economic expansionism

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 11 hours ago

I saw the film in a theater with someone who wanted to impress upon me that someone pointed out to her how alike it was to what happened to indigenous peoples in the Americas (someone else had pointed that out to her, so she assumed I wouldn't get it on my own). I was like, if you think that's a novel observation, you really need to be hit in the face with concepts to understand things. It couldn't have been more obvious.

But maybe that highlights how much some people just aren't observant or introspective or whatever else. It would explain a lot.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 31 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah man, we all understood that the first time around when it was called Fern Gully.

Like Avatar if you want but like.... it is not a deep piece of media with hard-to-discern messaging. Shit is pretty clear.

[–] Maven@lemmy.zip 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

One time I unmatched someone from a dating app because the second avatar movie was coming out and they said that it was weird of me to say that the alien people were supposed to represent Native Americans because "they're just blue aliens why would you compare them to real life?"

Apparently media literacy makes you a weirdo?

[–] algorithmae@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 11 hours ago

Yes it definitely makes you weird. Turn the brain off and consume the media like a good little sheep (/s if it wasn't obvious)

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 20 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Fucking Tarzan was fighting evil white exploiters of pristine Africa in books back in the early 1900s.

A good white saviour from the evil white people, because the indigenous can't do it for themselves. Just like in Ferngully and Avatar.

[–] Hoimo@ani.social 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Are there even any indigenous people in Tarzan? I haven't read the book, but from the movie I only remember his gorilla buddy and the little elephant. I think Tarzan is more about rebelling against civilization in general, instead of colonization in specific (which James Cameron's Avatar is). It's very post-industrialization in that sense.

Edit: Whoops, just read the synopsis on Wikipedia. I don't think Tarzan is the white saviour you're looking for...

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Which Tarzan book did you read the synopsis for? Burroughs wrote 24 of them.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 6 points 16 hours ago

I can't decide if I should post the "wait, it's all the failures of capitalism?" or "wait, it's all systemic racism?" meme, cuz it's wait it's all both (always has been).

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It is also about settler colonialism. There are natural gas fields off the coast of Gaza.

[–] robinoberg@feddit.uk 2 points 8 hours ago

Imperialism is the highest stage of capitalism.

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 16 points 18 hours ago

Explore, exploit, exterminate.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 15 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Satisfactory music starts playing

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 14 hours ago

Paved paradise, put up a parking lot.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 10 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (6 children)

So... We manage to master space travel. We manage to master interstellar travel. We eventually find a planet with suitable environment for sustaining our species. And we just overlook it.

Can someone explain me the reasoning behind this?

Sci-fi to the side, there are more minerals available - readily - on asteroids and barren planets than anywhere else. Why go hopping around looking for habitable planets, to the reason of 1 out of who knows how many, to then strip mine it?

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

There could be many reasons:

  • The thing you are mining is actually very rare, and although it could be elsewhere, it's the only place you found it. This is the case in Avatar. The Unobtanium they are mining is not found anywhere else.
  • It's easier to mine on a habitable planet. You don't have all the extreme difficulty of operating in space or a planet/moon with no atmosphere. In Avatar workers can freely operate without any special equipment, using just a gas mask, and don't need to be astronauts.
  • You are assuming they found Pandora to mine on it. They probably found it through scientific research, and the mining angle only appeared later when the resource was found.

Another important detail is that in Avatar they don't have any faster than light tech. Pandora is in the Alpha Centauri system, the closest star to the Sun, and it takes years to get there anyway. Sure, there might be lots of better places to choose, but it's literally the only habitable body in reachable distance from Earth unless you want to spend decades flying in one direction.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 1 points 8 hours ago

Tbf, the air on Pandora is toxic to humans. That was the entire point of using the avatars in the first movie... Wouldn't exactly call that suitable for sustaining the life of our species

And that material they found in the planet was some fictional things humans had never encountered before.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago (31 children)

The resource being extracted on the avatar planet was unobtanium.

It was only available on that planet, precisely so intelligent people like you can’t say “why not mine barren rocks instead”?

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This annoyed me also.

If the Avatar universe has physics like ours, which it looks like it does from the way things move etc..

The protoplanetry disk that the planet formed from, must have had the unobtanium, since it is so evenly spread around the later formed planet.

Yes, there are higher concentrations in various places, which could have come from impact events in the past; if this is the case the impactors are likely from the local asteroid belt or equivalent.

The unobtanium must be available, in a much easier to extract form, in asteroids in the soloar system or the moons of Pandora.

Either way, a mineral is a terrible maguffin for a space faring civilization.

In the second movie, the whale brain juice is a much better maguffin, but still kinda stupid for a technologically advanced species.

Assume that to get interstellar travel, with the suspended animation and brain beaming tech we are shown, humans are a good 200 years ahead of where we are now....given that they can also make fully functional alien bodies from scratch, that can breed and pass on genetic material to what look like viable offspring. The level of synthetic biology expertise must be insane, and they can't make this brain juice....it is just stupid.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Me too.

It’s supposed to be an indictment of capitalism. But that falls flat when you realize it was one of the most profitable movies of all time; grossing over 2 billion and being one of the fastest to reach the various benchmarks at theaters.

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Pandora was a moon, not a planet. (Doesn't change your point, just correcting the detail.)

load more comments (29 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ech@lemm.ee 42 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Avatr is about capitalism

That wasn't glaringly obvious to everyone?

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Well it's literally Pocahontas in space so more obvious comparison is to the colonialism. They could grow gardens and farms while destroying the natives, the movie would have been the same.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago
  1. Colonialism was driven by capitalism

  2. They weren't settling land - they were setting up a mining operation.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Thx. Thought I missed something

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›