Have a look at Kraken which has many state-of-the-art models for both HTR and OCR
Technology
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
I use ocrmypdf, after being a bit frustrated with gscan2pdf. There is a simple ui available, but I just created a tiny script that does the ocr , deskew, etc. In one operation with wildcard file selection.
I also installed a jbig compressor that really shrinks images. My processed docs are generally 40% to 80% smaller, and it seems to get better tesseract output than gscan does.
@hedge If the font is “strange”, you may try Ocular OCR. Intended for historical books, has a possibility to learn new fonts.
Thanks to @[email protected], @[email protected], & @[email protected] for their responses. I forgot that Tesseract is mainly used from the command line; something which, despite being a Linux person, I'm not super proficient with. It looks like gscan2pdf and Master PDF OCRs got different results despite, I think, both using the same version of Tesseract.
despite, I think, both using the same version of Tesseract.
So difference must be in the settings, which you can achieve both by using tesseract directly