this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
464 points (97.2% liked)

Reddit

17790 readers
857 users here now

News and Discussions about Reddit

Welcome to !reddit. This is a community for all news and discussions about Reddit.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


Rule 1- No brigading.

**You may not encourage brigading any communities or subreddits in any way. **

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things.



Rule 2- No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

**No illegal or NSFW or gore content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-Reddit posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



:::spoiler Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The drama:

Some indian company made a "Anonymous survey" asking about a employee's stress level.

Then they fired all employees who had a certain rating, even though it was "anonymous".

The news article: https://m.economictimes.com/news/new-updates/startup-asks-employees-if-they-are-stressed-and-then-fires-them-leaked-letter-goes-viral/articleshow/116129662.cms

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 83 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I started collecting all the times it happened but gave up after 3 of them.

[–] logos@sh.itjust.works 45 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The only legitimate reason I can think of is that it’s viral marketing. I think they might be on to something.

[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Makes the company appear deranged.

Who are they appealing to

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You are indeed correct.

If only there was a man with a particular adjustment skills...

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They caught him :(. It’s objectively hilarious that his name is Luigi though.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz -2 points 1 week ago

Nah, Luigi is innocent. Luigi was having a pint at drag's house at the time of the assassination.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I think name recognition is good no matter what in their eyes. Many companies don't care about bad PR.

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Interesting because most of the Reddit front page is viral marketing nowadays.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

The rules only cover viral marketing when they're not already paying off reddit.

[–] logos@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

That's a good point

[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 1 week ago

Who is viral marketing the adjuster hehe

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 80 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The linked article says they could not confirm the genuineness of the email. Is there any confirmation that this is real? I did a bit of searching and several Indian sites are reporting on it, but they all seem to be reporting about the outrageous email going viral, not checking the source.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 46 points 1 week ago (2 children)

WTF does reddit suffer from leaving this story up?

[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 81 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Corporate owners don't like the anti capitalist sentiment

Also "racism"

[–] ReanuKeeves@lemm.ee 30 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I got permabanned on there for saying child abusers should get beaten the same way they beat kids. The reason given for the ban was "promotes violence", I appealed the ban and their response was "we don't want people promoting child abuse, do not contact us anymore". I don't know if some admin was having a bad day or just illiterate but there are some power tripping mods and admins on there that will ban and remove for literally no good reason. The fact that they accused me of promoting child abuse when I was saying the complete opposite was pure trolling.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

Maybe they think a child abuser who has just received a beating is more likely, not less likely, to go on and abuse children.

Think about it: do you really think a man who beats his children is gonna be a better dad after he gets beaten up?

Violence is a complex subject, and people’s instinct to solve problems with beating up people they’re frustrated with is a curse of humanity, no matter how obvious a solution it may seem in the moment.

Some people, lots of people actually, and with good reason, think that violence begets violence.

[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mods are like Catholic clergy... It attracts certain types...

I am always amazed at how Trump voter gets less sympathy than pedophiles on neo lib modded socials. That's the only calls to violence they will accept but god forbid we get a wood chipper going for a known pedo

ToS vIolaTioN

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org -1 points 1 week ago

So is Bill cliton and some prince andrew UK and Chomsky and dershevitz

Bill gates too

What's your point...

Diddy, Jay z

R Kelly

We are ruled and entertained by pedos

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

!yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com

[–] Heisenburner@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I got banned from the Ontario subreddit for "promoting violence" for saying that I couldn't wait to piss on Doug Ford's grave

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Maybe it's taken down on the basis it's a private email including multiple identifiable names and doxs those involved.

Even the to field is visible with multiple identifiable.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 19 points 1 week ago

Seems very much not real. :)

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Neither the email nor your article indicates that the survey was anonymous.

[–] lily33@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Why is this downvoted? If it's true it's a valid criticism, and if it's false, I couldn't find a mention of anonymity either.

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago

because it's not valid criticism. no one is complaining about the context of the survey it's about Reddit suppressing a story on the whims of corporate moderators.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

Same thing happened here. People here don't seem to be actually interested in the truth, or sources. They just want to feed their confirmation bias to feel better about themselves.

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Reddit ahh mental gymnastics

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They just meant anonymous in the sense that they wouldn't publish the results on Facebook.

An excellent reminder that "confidential" means "We won't tell anyone else what you said but can still use it against you."

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is it just because the company is named?

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

seems plausible it could be a legal concern about being sued for defamation

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I suppose, althought the story is out there, and redacting the company name would be like a bandaid on a dead guy.

[–] nek0d3r@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago