Bard - College of Glamour
Barbarian - Path of Giants
Cleric - Death Domain
Druid - Circle of Stars
Paladin - Oath of the Crown
Fighter - Arcane Archer
Monk - Drunken Master
Ranger - Swarmkeeper
Rogue - Swashbuckler
Sorcerer - Shadow Magic
Warlock - Hexblade
Wizard - Bladesinging
this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
177 points (98.9% liked)
Games
16950 readers
829 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm so happy Glamour is finally here :)
I am so psyched for Swashbuckler, oh man.
Thats what I was in a recent DnD campaign, can't wait to try it in BG3
Swords Bard/Swashbuckler Rogue, I'm finally going to be able to make my favourite swordsman.
That has got to be one of the best sword fights in all of cinema, if not the best.
I think the storytelling alone it manages to get across makes it top 3.
That said I always liked this one:
And this is after they announced twice they were done updating the game and moving on... Larian is addicted to updating their already perfect game with more content
As phenomenally good as Baldurs Gate 3 is, it's not perfect. I lost an entire character at the very end of act one because I pissed off Mol lately.
Huh? How did you manage to do that?
A while ago I started a Dark Urge paladin who immediately broke his oath upon reaching Gale. Shortly after I ran into Mol who I think I failed in intimidation check against if I remember right. She said she'd tell the guards I was threatening children.
I wandered off and did all the rest of act 1, found Halsin, wiped out the goblins and leaders, etc, and when I got back to the grove if any guard saw me it'd trigger a dialogue where I had to talk my way out of it or they'd attack me because of Mol. Thing is, I talked my way out of it, but it didn't move my character after the dialogue so it'd just trigger again on a loop forever.
I used Astarion to turn my PC invisible to get around this, talked to Halsin who didn't seen to mind, received rewards, thought I'd subverted it. Then I went to camp for the end of act one celebration and, yep, the gurds did the same thing there as well. Except now they're all together on my camp and every single other character that was there but the four in my party was on their side. That's Halsin, Laezel, Shadowheart, and every single thiefling and guard against my unrested party.
Broken. Do NOT mess with Mol.
Not really broken, you don't have to intimidate her. I'd say more like you inadvertently pissed off the only important child in camp, and now have consequences.
You actually dont have to resolve the grove quest though, you can ignore it and it will "happen" on its own, or else you can just join the goblins side temporarily.
I disagree about the you don't have to part. You can, and you should explore these dialog options if you feel like. They are part of the game for a reason. It's role play. This was just a standard conversation option with an NPC, and it also had an option to resolve the conflict it created.
The option to convince the guards that you are good was functionally broken. Gamoo explains that as well in the post above. The point is, it's a bug. It's far from perfect.
Also bugs: You can (at least we constantly ran into this, even recently) also lose romance options because of events that happen at long rests. They overwrite the romance events.
The mage tower quest, one particular and important NPC was stuck and didn't even have a turn in combat. Just T posed there. Reloading the save did not help.
That said, the game is great. Just not perfect.
If Larian has called it a bug then I'll agree it is. I'm saying though it wouldnt bother me if it was intentional either. Sure a bit heavy handed of a reaction to essentially bar you from camp, but each playthrough going differently than expected is a strong point.
Also, can and should are not the same as must or have to.
It's something that it lets you do and the consequence for it is the easily the most broken part of the game. It's obviously not been thought through or set up properly and it's an incredibly poor thing to be there at all, never mind years after release.
Not "having" to do something has no bearing on whether or not that thing is broken. When this happens, it feels broken, like a really serious bug. It repeats a conversation indefinitely, it's very clearly not intentional, especially considering moments earlier I was chatting to Halsin in the grove and he was very complimentary due to me saving his life, stopping a shadow druid from fucking over innocents, and saving the entire grove. But because I threatened a thief and gained the check the whole quest line for the first act is fucked AFTER I did ask the work.
And like I said I've completely wiped out so the goblins and already made it to camp to celebrate. But instead they all want to kill me. I was specifically aiming to get Halsin in my party this time round but can't now and I found out 40 hours in.
Okay so its a big deal for you, I get it. If it happened to me I'd continue my game though, its hardly game breaking. I get that it broke your feelings but the grove has very little to do with the rest of the game. I'd have long forgotten about it by act 2, and even if I did care so much you get 25 autosaves and quicksaves.
I'm not going to hold it against Larian for leaving this in, if its in the current build. They already have gone far above any expectations, and yet here you still are complaining that Larian is ridiculous to allow this bug.
Broken my feelings? Dude this clearly isn't the intended behaviour and therefore is a big and it's completely derailed the role I was playing.
Hold it against them? It's just criticism of a broken bit of their phenomenal game. I started out by specifically saying it's amazing but not perfect, with this example. It's ok to criticise things you like, you know.
Dude you threatened a kid and are suffering the consequences. This is intended behavior in an RPG. You cheesed and broke it to get it to that point in the camp and you're blaming Larian. You chose to play Dark Urge and be a dick to a child and don't want to deal with everyone hating that. Move on to act 2 and suffer the consequences lol.
Once again I expected consequences I didn't expect it to be completely bugged out and broken. I passed the persuasion check and had to do it again, and again, and again, until I failed, because once the dialogue closed my character was still in their sight. Every other time where you're spotted somewhere you're not supposed to be and you pass a persuasion check you're either given access to the area or moved out of the area afterwards specifically to avoid this problem.
If you actually think it's intended behaviour and not an oversight then I don't know what to tell you, you're obviously wrong, it's the buggiest thing I've seen in the game - watching it happen looks obviously wrong. Note that every single person in the actual druids grove wasn't hostile to me whatsoever. It was just some guards around the outside - after they let me in through the gate. Halsin, Vaghda, the dude Halsin sends you to for the rune reward, the Halsins assistant, the druids milling around around the statue, even the bears, none of them hostile. Then I travel to camp and suddenly they're amongst thirty people trying to kill me.
How about "I didn't do that, she's a thief and a liar by reputation" as a deception check, since that's literally who she is and she stole from me early in the game and I was just trying to get it back? How about just conforming to how these same checks work in the rest of the game?
Or how about not suddenly turning every single person at my camp where I have to go to rest hostile on the word of a known thief and liar after I've just saved every single person there? That's why they're there, to celebrate me saving their lives. They all merrily made their way all the way to my camp to celebrate me, sat there drinking and chatting with my party members, then when I turn up every last one of them and my own party members turns hostile and tries to kill me. On the word of someone who cons and steals from people on their way into a druid grove.
It couldn't be clearer that the way these consequences appear don't make sense.
All this because I dared to suggest one miniscule part of a game I love, have spent 250 hours playing, and have described as amazing, phenomenal, and a masterpiece, was a bit broken.
Noones saying you are wrong, you just care too much. What is a funny quirk to some is a huge game breaking issue to you.
Nobody thinks I'm wrong? I replied to a comment that said it's intended behaviour. And it has completely derailed the character.
Yes, we all agree its a bug. I'm specifically saying for me its quirky, and I actually like when strange things happen in rpg games. See how its become one of the playthroughs you remember most?
Same thing could happen to me and yet I'd remember it fondly as the weird playthrough where I threatened a child and was permanently hostile to any grove guards.
Game breaking means you can't continue at all. It didnt derail your character because apparently your character is one to threaten children, and you could keep playing despite what happened.
I would love to be permanently hostile to grove guards, instead I'm stuck in a loop and have to murder my own companions.
I want crazy consequences, but they're only satisfying when it's something that was thought through and implemented. Something that actually makes sense. Sneaking around guards? Yes. Need to pass a persuasion/deception check? Yes? Halsin is a bit put off in conversation, or even decides not to accompany me or reward me? Absolutely.
An entire population of an area suddenly turning on a dime from praising me and giving me gifts because I saved their lives to suddenly trying to murder me because a known untrustworthy actor says I threatened them without so much as a speech check at my camp that I can't avoid going to AND stopping me from resting beforehand, obviously not. I saved their lives like 15-20 game HOURS AFTER threatening the thief. They invited themselves to my camp to celebrate with me for rescuing every last one of them, and then tried to kill me when I show up. It's nonsense, you must see how that's very unsatisfying? It doesn't even make sense in world.
Well yeah you forced the game breaking part by refusing to accept what had happened. I simply wouldnt have done that, but I have been frustrated before and tried to force things so I get it.
Honestly if you hadn't made a choice that somewhat led to that situation I'd be more likely to agree with you. Since its a game, no harm no foul, and again quirky things happening in RPGs is nearly always a good thing for me.
A giant in skyrim hitting me with a club and sending me a quarter mile into the air surely could be seen as a bug, but many think of that fondly instead. Thats the point I'm making. I'm sorry you had a rough time with that playthrough though.
A giant catapulting you in Skyrim costs you only the time since your last save. I'm more than happy to accept consequences that make sense in any way.
Yeah but that save could be ages ago. Took me like a month to realize you could turn on autosaves, and that still resets you back to the last loading screen.
Maybe this is just a good example of where people react differently to different things. Its hard to say what will be frustrating before it happens.
Wait I thought there was already cross play?
My understanding is you can transfer save files between consoles and PC. But in coop you can only play with other people on the same platform you're currently on.
Oh man I'm so tired of Google Ai telling me it's cross platform. Not that there's plans for it. My buddy is ready to purchase it for his ps5 and we were gonna play it over the holidays together.
Dont use google AI, or at least look at the references. Its often pulling lines from unrelated documents or very old ones.