this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
122 points (80.5% liked)

Technology

60101 readers
3326 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 115 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

I've seen this claim recently and it's rubbish.

Yes, if by "nothing" we mean writing next to no code, because they're busy either:

  • architecting software solutions, as they're knowledgeable enough that they should be doing this instead of writing code
  • understanding a lot of what is going on in components and/or the system so that when there's an issue they say "oh, this is likely because of X" and the resolution takes days instead of weeks.

I.e. yes, there is a percentage of developers who we pile other tasks on and they don't get to write code.

My experience is that the more knowledgeable developers get, the less code they write.

Then neurodivergent peeps are different - an Autistic dev might be super knowledgeable and happy writing unit tests because they don't enjoy the uncertainty of large problems, or an ADHD developer might have a large system-wide view but write what seem like small contributions.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Or have incessant meetings with Senior management or Business Unit leadership to keep them in the loop or even constrain their unrealistic expectations.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah… How many “ghost devs” don’t produce much code because they area stuck in meeting after meeting that they don’t need to be in just in case “someone has a tech question”?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We recently got moved under someone who leads call center operations and they’re wanting to apply similar metrics to the devs to “ensure they’re being productive the entire time”. I told them that there’s lots of work they do outside the normal 9-5 and that you can’t just measure what someone does by lines of code created else you’ll end up with a 30 line if statement instead of a for each letter loop, but they don’t seem to care. If things get implemented I’m just waiting for the shit show it’ll cause.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

Yup. I judge devs by problems solved (bugs fixed, features implemented) based on initial estimate and actual delivery time. If they're consistently off, they either need help with estimation (I'll tell them to increase estimates) or they aren't doing their job. I don't care if the solution is 1 lines or 1000 lines (well, I prefer less code), I care if they feel confident in their estimate before starting work, and if they're able to deliver close to their estimate. I also care what others on the team think about their estimate, and I'll review anything that seems out of whack.

And this is why I refuse to work anywhere where the people managing devs don't have dev experience. My boss was a dev, and they're fantastic at catching me on my BS, which tells me I'm being fairly evaluated. I can't ask for more than that.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It's possible to have a developer that does nothing. But that'll requires a project manager that does nothing and a manager that does nothing. And coworkers that are willing to put up with that shit. Everybody's running kanban or agile simply to keep this from happening.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Actually watch the video, you're way too generous in your analysis.

The metric is essentially lines of code. That's it.

So everyone who isn't hacking away ultra verbose code is considered useless. Lead devs and architects often don't write any code at all. They're not unproductive.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago

Ah, the Musk approach to dev

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Shit, and here I thought spending my day unblocking people somehow boosted productivity.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

On the whole, absolutely. As a quantifiable metric that presents well to leadership? Sorry, bub.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

I did watch the video. Just because it's what she said doesn't mean that was the only thing that was there. You should also note that the MBA that designed and performed the study was also a middle school dropout, and has a bunch of narratives weaved about his life.

This paper has an agenda and he has something to sell.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

I'm a Lead dev/architect. I'm the least productive when I'm coding because all the other stuff falls through the cracks, like devs doing nothing. I've had to get rid of a few people over the years for not doing anything, they get away with it for a while because I'm not a babysitter but it comes to light eventually and they get the boot.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

In my experience, kanban and agile might technically prevent an employee from doing nothing, but they also might very well facilitate someone doing nothing productive.

https://ludic.mataroa.blog/blog/i-will-fucking-haymaker-you-if-you-mention-agile-again/

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Some people do nothing but kanban and agile which is effectively doing nothing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you are properly using either of those it's very easy to tell if someone's not pulling their weight or is having extreme difficulty in a situation.

As soon as someone starts underperforming in project management constructs, you put more eyes on the task. They're either a legitimately stuck, or they're not working.

They're just tools, and they make it very easy to visualize what's going on.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Exactly.

We use both, and the only people who spend significant amounts of time interacting with the board are project managers (during sync meetings across teams), scrum masters (planning and following up), and product owners (creating requirements). Devs spend a little time adding their own estimates, comments, or moving things along the kanban board, but that's not a lot of time, and that goes for me as a lead as well.

We have 7 or 8 dev teams, three project managers (one per region), and two scrum masters (at HQ, not sure how our outside teams handle it). And honestly, I think our two scrum masters are a little redundant because there's only so much agile that needs to be done.

If a dev (regardless of seniority) is spending more than half a day in a given week on kanban stuff, they're probably avoiding doing their job.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

It happens, but it always comes to light eventually. People are too busy keeping up with their own work to be babysitting someone who doesn't want to put in the effort.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Has an MBA ever contributed anything of value?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

Statistically speaking, a few of them definitely fucked up at some point and accidentally did the right thing. Or committed suicide.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That rate seems high. But, I have done post-mortems on a bad developer's run at a company, and found they did very nearly nothing. No commits, no issues opened or closed, some comments, but that was almost their entire digital footprint.

Most developers I've worked with are obviously not doing nothing, though some of us (including myself) get stuck doing a lot of work on a project that never makes it into production due to shifting priorities.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yup. I'm a senior software dev, and some weeks I write no code at all. Sometimes that's because I'm researching something (output is a doc a/ estimates), other times it's code reviews, and other times I'm stuck in meetings all week.

But most weeks I'll write some code, even if it's just fixing some tech debt. If someone isn't contributing for a month, they're definitely not doing their job.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Our most critical dev / solutions expert spends most weeks in meetings.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's our architect, and they're not a dev (they don't even do code reviews), but they are quite critical because it's their job to understand the entire app, including in-progress changes from other teams. They have their own team (architecture), so they don't report on any dev team, they report to the director.

Maybe that's what others are calling a "lead dev"?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Seems to be a trend, my boss was telling me that the VP's in our org think we need more lead devs and less solutions architects, though they would functionally be doing largely the same role, meetings, planning, design, interfacing with teams they are dependent on, annual technology reviews etc. I think it's going to bite them in the end

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I imagine hiring will be an issue. Devs want to dev, and naming an architect role a "dev" role doesn't communicate the role properly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yep, they talked about it a bit during my hiring what I wanted my title to be since they are paid the same and do the same tasks(in addition to some coding expectations). I'm glad I chose architect, but ultimately they squeezed me out of that with RTO mandates for architects and above.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Tldr the original article is all based off the findings of AI trying to evaluate the efficiency of code contributions. And from the little i looked at it, it seems to fall apart pretty quickly after that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

It’s really astonishing how an entire article written using an AI-based metric is taken seriously, let alone discussed at length. Well, it probably plays into existing biases, which is likely the reason for its existence in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sometimes I feel like I do nothing.

My productivity is pretty low since I got promoted to one of our “lead developers.” So much of my time is spent looking at other people’s code, answering questions, mentoring, etc. Task switching becomes a huge issue, where even if I have time I’ve been pulled back and forth and it takes me like an hour to get back into whatever I was doing. It can take weeks for me to close tickets sometimes. And sometimes even when I have busy days, I come away feeling like I did nothing.

It’s definitely giving me Peter Principle vibes sometimes. And though my manager always tells me I’m doing good work, I feel like he’s too disconnected from my day-to-day, and that surely my Scrum Master and Product Owner are trying to get me replaced.

It’s…not a great state of mind, even if I know it’s bullshit. They wouldn’t be giving me raises if they didn’t think I was worth it. But…still. I’ve never stayed at the same job this long, and part of me keeps waiting for the other shoe to drop.

Imposter syndrome is a bitch.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

I'm in the same exact boat, but would like to offer you this:

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago

There is a difference between productivity and activity, you can be 100% active at work all day, yet 0% productive. Imagine you work on a project for 6 months and then the manager decide to drop the project. You have been unproductive for 6 months, doesn't mean you were slacking off, but in the end when we calculate the productivity of developers, it is lower because of this.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago

As a previous so-called 'ghost engineer', it took three people to replace me, and four months for damage control when I wasn't there to keep things in top shape. There was documentation to keep things running, but since I wrote that documentation and "my contributions weren't necessary foe the team's success" Well. Why leave them?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m one of those who “do nothing”, if you’re measuring by commits and lines of code.

  • as an architect, I spend way too much time doing diagrams and presentation
  • as a point of engineering escalation, I spend a lot of time researching things no one can figure out
  • as a stickler for code quality, I like nothing more than those days where my lines of code are negative

On the other hand, if you go by the amount of code I indirectly effect with best practices, code quality, appsec, and assisting developers, I affect all of engineering (hundreds)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

And that's obvious from the very beginning, when you look at how human collectives work. You never can determine who really does nothing.

Even if we imagine this is somehow possible, there are social predators, as in psychopaths or at least scheming jerks, in every one of them, who don't want a transparent structure of responsibility. And there's the majority of us who rely on their kind to handle the social dynamics we don't want. And there's need for some stability.

But all that aside, engineers would be the last group in my list to check for people "doing nothing". Almost everyone eager to discuss engineers "doing nothing" would fit higher there.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago

No, but I want to be one.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

If someone really does nothing, it's really obvious. You don't need statistical analysis to determine who it is, just ask their teammates. Developers don't work in isolation. Actually, it's a very collaborative job where you're in constant interaction with other people. If someone doesn't contribute their fair share, it's going to be obvious very quickly.

The problem is often a lack of mechanism to act on it. Sure everyone might complain about a coworker, but once a person is hired they become just a number and management doesn't typically care about individual performance, only that all the spots in the org chart are filled.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yet more bullshit probably aimed at RTO. Corporate media will keep pushing the same narrative.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah her comment that basically saying bullshit like this almost SOLEY to justify layoffs is pretty deprived is right on the money

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

This is actually a pretty good analysis. I love that she clarifies it's not a research paper, but a "canva infographic." Spot on.

She doesn't mention that the MBA professor who authored the infographic also seems to contract with FounderPartners, a VC consulting firm.

So this is really an ad for his side gig; "Pay us lots of money, and we'll justify your layoffs with sciency mumbo jumbo.🌈😘📈"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I didn't watch this yet, but the title matches with the article this company published how their LLM model discovered this, but they (the authors) don't even fully understand how this was calculated. Basically, using AI for AI's sake.

Edit. Found it.

Edit 2. Here's the original Lemmy post, if you're interested. (I don't know how to bang-link a Lemmy post...)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

She found the original, properly written article that has a healthy discussion about quality of commits, and had no mention of productivity

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

If I had to put money one which an MBA or a software engineer doing jack shit at work. I’d lean pretty heavily towards the MBA.

I’m pretty sure the reason we don’t see the engineer side is because the engineers are focused on problems solving. The other groups are more focused on selling and conveying information. If that’s your job you are going to be much better at shifting attention scrutiny to other groups.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

I've seen a couple that have had like one or two trivial commits in the half year it took for them to get laid off. Idk what kind of manager did not solve whatever was going on there. I guess getting laid off is a solution, too.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I knew a guy who worked at microsoft and basically did all of his work for the week in a couple of hours and then spent the entire rest of the week playing VR

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

If in the end he does at least as much work as the average coworker and has no responsibility to be instant available then i see no problem with this.

Energy is not the same for everyone. My autistic ass can move actual mountains of work between 7-8am without feeling a thing. But holding a basic conversation in the afternoon is too much and could cause me to having to call someone to drive me home.

NT often assume i should converse energy in the morning and then i will have energy in the afternoon but nope. trying to do so makes me even more drained because things move to slow. I’d just be wasting time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

I believe it, but in a different scenario

Imagine the worker does some work, but it takes ten hours more of other people's testing to find all the bugs, and ten hours of someone more competent to fix them. Even though he did twenty hours of work, if he never showed up the pace of the work, someone doing it better might not affect others by just being more correct and actually might save others work by organizing the code in a way that is easier to understand.

It is not obvious that people who do a lot of work are actually positively benefiting the overall effort. I've certainly had to go and rewrite terrible code before. If it wasn't there, I wouldn't need to read it to see if it needed to be rewritten in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

People do something, but often it's the wrong thing, and essentially nothing, or worse than nothing

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Not into software developing but....I got a project manager and project lead that basically took over my project under my feet because they thought I was working too slowly. Now they got a junior engineer who thinks he's inventing all the things I had to invent to solve a problem....like a painter who thinks he's designed the perfect home. Well they're finding out now where ideas come from and that its not in the paint can or the brush. I love watching them squirm when their shitty design can't pass DFMEA so then ...do they design something different? Nah! DFMEA's can't tell you that your design id dumb as fuck! Its you! You! The engineer has to realize how stupid their design in. Instead, they proceed to apply resources to the ton of action items. Surely the pig will fly if we crush all the bones and reshape him into a parachute! I'll be right here when you guys are done fooling around and getting monthly praises and recognition. Praises and recognition by the way is the best way to get engineers out of your way...they get promoted to project lead or management! Suddenly they cant invent your inventions anymore!

load more comments
view more: next ›