this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
681 points (97.0% liked)

News

23599 readers
3570 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 99 points 3 weeks ago (13 children)

I do not blame any woman or queer person arming themselves in the U.S. right now. But I think that you should think of it as personal protection rather than preparation for something larger.

Be aware of this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disarmament_of_the_German_Jews

The Jews of Germany constituted less than 1 percent of the country's population. It is preposterous to argue that the possession of firearms would have enabled them to mount resistance against a systematic program of persecution implemented by a modern bureaucracy, enforced by a well-armed police state, and either supported or tolerated by the majority of the German population. Mr. Carson's suggestion that ordinary Germans, had they had guns, would have risked their lives in armed resistance against the regime simply does not comport with the regrettable historical reality of a regime that was quite popular at home. Inside Germany, only the army possessed the physical force necessary for defying or overthrowing the Nazis, but the generals had thrown in their lot with Hitler early on.

Obviously, women and queer people are a lot more than 1% of the population, but you can't count on every queer person being on the right side and you certainly can't count on every woman to be on the right side.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago (46 children)

The second amendment was not made for personal protection

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

It was also opposed by George Washington on the argument that "A bunch of farmers with guns will never defeat a trained army." He basically did exactly that, but it took the support of one of the world's largest super powers at the time in order to do it - France.

Not to say don't arm yourself. I plan on doing exactly that myself. But don't expect to be overthrowing the dictatorship to come. There are no resistance groups being armed by the EU here.

[–] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 22 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Washington was talking about the militias that were present in the early parts of the war that were under trained and undisciplined. The red coats took them easily and they fled often so the continental congress started the continental army lead by Washington, which was a trained and disciplined army in the style of European standing armies, which was able to take on and even defeat the British occasionally.

After the war the ruling elite still had this idealized vision of citizen militias protecting the liberty of white man and saw it as a less tyrannical, and cheaper model then the European professional standing army and made the second amendment to encourage it. Washington was saying that that system failed and will never work and that we should have a trained army ready to take on European powers if they come back.

Now we have the worst of both worlds, a massive army that gobbles up tax dollars and a bunch of untrained citizens with guns who barely understand what a militia is much less can protect the liberty of the nation.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (45 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Ekybio@lemmy.world 81 points 3 weeks ago

With sentiment like "your body, my choice" floating around more and more, I hope that everyone in need will arm themselves accoringly.

Because the guys on the other guys think they are made of steel. Remind them that they have a lot of very vulnerable blood vessels close to the skin and that knifes are as cheap as their lies...

[–] kipo@lemm.ee 74 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

Jessie McGrath, 63, a lifelong Republican who is trans, grew up around guns on farms in Colorado and Nebraska. She decided to vote for Harris when Republicans started attacking gender-affirming care and “wanting to basically outlaw my ability to exist”. She ended up being a delegate at the Democratic national convention.

“Government getting involved in making healthcare decisions is something that I never thought I would see the Republican party doing,” she said.

What the actual...how are people this ignorant.

[–] Trae@lemmy.world 38 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

She was 100% on board with them regulating reproductive care because it has never personally affected her as a biological male.

She only has an issue now that her favorite team turned on her after telling her for the last 30 years that she's next.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 22 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (47 children)

Assigned male at birth is the term you want to use. "Biological male" is a term used by transphobes to spread misinformation.

Biology is very complex and not your elementary school version of biology. What makes someone "biologically" male? Is it having a penis, having testis, having more testosterone than estrogen, having XY chromosomes? These can all be intermixed with other characteristics.

The "basic biology" definition doesn't work in the real world, and the people using it are actively trying to harm trans people or ignorant. Now you're more informed so ignorance isn't an excuse anymore.

load more comments (47 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago

You know how some cis people are fucking morons? We won’t better than y’all.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 69 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

The left needs to get on board with this. Govt isn’t going to protect you from far right militias when the shit hits the fan.

[–] nothing@lemm.ee 22 points 3 weeks ago

Cops aren't required to protect you from anything. Learn how to protect you and yours. And learn how to read situations, always.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 62 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

Can confirm, my wife has expressed an interest. We're just waiting for the local LGBTQ friendly range to open.

The other local ranges are either run by cops (ACAB) or require NRA memberships to join. Yeah, that's not happening.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago

Sometimes you have to open the gun range you wish to see in your neighborhood.

Or something like that. I think Gandhi said it.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Yewb@lemmy.world 54 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Im a liberal guess who now has a gun safe with multiple guns?

I guess we are making America great again by arming the liberals too?

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 25 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Also by helping the struggling gun industry

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

there's an easy solution: only buy foreign made guns.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 40 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

American ‘solutions’ for American problems

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 3 weeks ago

Remember that step 2 is to practice!

[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

At this rate America's 4B movement is gonna stand for "bang bang bang bang"...

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 32 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Guns!, the cause and solution to most of America's problems.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Stay strapped or get clapped...

It feels like they picked the worst screenshot intentionally though when talking about that YouTuber...

Like, maybe it's a new kind of magnifier that you flip up to use instead of off to the side to not use. But that AR just doesn't look like whoever built it knew what they were doing.

Like the BLM protests where it was obvious people went out and bought ARs just for the event and didn't even put sights on beforehand.

That being said don't wander around gun YouTube on your account it only takes a couple videos for the algorithm to decide you're a gun nut, and that comes along with a bunch of other rightwing videos, because normally it does.

But Reagan is the one who passed Cali's gun laws, and he did so because people he didn't like were marching with guns.

Obviously it would have made more sense to start when Biden was in office, but it seems like unless protestors carry guns, the cops will just beat them without a second thought.

If they even think some have guns tho... Cops won't do shit.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If cops get return fire in a (leftist) protest/riot, they'll come back with MRAPs and live rounds and re-enact Kent State. They live for that moment.

Oh, and that magnifier is on a Unity FAST mount, and yes, it flips up to get in position. It's on a higher sight plane along with the Eotech to help with shooting while using things like night vision goggles, and a lot of people say it's more natural and comfortable for fast shooting in general. It's actually some Gucci shit and looks squared away to me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

The whole Russian project was to have our "polite society" collapse as we, as Americans, lost all faith in our institutions and turned against one another and in the process, also lost any kind of collective identity, which makes us a weaker target externally. That happened.

It's crazy to me, looking back, how much this was openly discussed along the way, as it successfully happened in slow motion over the last 10-15 years - wasn't there also a book released that just laid their strategy bare? If there are historians in the future, will be amazing to read the perspective on all of this with time and analysis from those not trapped within the cycle of death and hopelessness.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

Checking 2 boxes out of 4 from the Libertarian dream

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Good. Gun rights are human rights. All people have the right to defend themselves and those around them. Taking that away by banning the only tool that evens the playing field is not OK.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Just ignore all the dead kids. They're not part of this discussion.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (17 children)

There is going to be a lot more dead minority and marginalised people if they don't make it possibly lethal to fuck with them.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (13 children)

Lol, this thread is a train wreck and is the perfect example of why Republicans keep winning elections despite being on the wrong side of history and having policies that hurt the American population at large.

The left will never win as long as we form circular firing squads and argue over petty bullshit.

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

firing squads

You need guns for that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

I have a conundrum, maybe people in this thread can weigh in.

I'm a woman living in an area with a small but loud MAGA faction and useless police who are probably also Trump supporters. I'm also not white.

Hunting is common here, and although I've never been I do know how to shoot and have access to classes if I want to improve. We also have friends and family with firearms and a couple of them live nearby.

I feel like I should get a gun. I know how to use one and I want to be able to protect myself if necessary. But I'm scared of firearms. Something about them disturbs me. Maybe it's the likelihood of someone dying once a gun comes out. Maybe it's just a fear, however unfounded, that I can't or shouldn't handle such a powerful tool. But the reason behind the feeling doesn't matter so much as my ability to overcome it, and I'm not sure I can. If I had money to burn I'd buy one just to see how I feel, but I don't so I can't.

In short, I'm torn. I want to be able to just get a gun for peace of mind and call it a day, but I fear that as soon as the gun is in my house I will become a nervous wreck and that will defeat the whole purpose.

I'd love to hear from anyone who feels the same or has overcome this fear.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›