NO SUPREME COURT JUSTICE SHOULD BE HOSTIG OR SPEAKING AT ANY FUNDRAISER PERIOD. by doing so should call for immediate removal from their position.
But guess they can as corrupt as they like and nothing can be done to them.
This mother fucker is stripping our rights away and in October going see a case that going strip us of our ability to fight against financially Institutions. Which by they if they vote to strip it will also destroy social security and medicare.
Things can be done about it, but one party will never vote against one of their own
And the other party will fret and hand-wring while passing non-binding resolutions and writing sternly worded letters.
We've had right wing congresspeople openly call for revolution and allude to violence. We have no voices from the left with the balls or the platform to say what needs to be done with Thomas and his ilk.
He's corrupt to the core, string him up along with his billionaire owner and review every case he's decided.
good cop bad cop.
no. i do not mean both sides are the same. one side wants the status quo to remain but isn't taking seriously the fact that their bad cop partner is going to take them both down. maybe because they're all as fucking old as possible.
i am not sure i'm comfortable with expressing a desire to string anyone up but i agree that when WEAREALLDOMESTICTERRORISTS isn't a statement that grinds this whole shitshow to a halt and we examine wtf is going on in the US ... then wtf are people doing?
I don't think it's good cop/bad cop. It's all bad cop. They forgot why they became cops. To help people. And they help no one.
of course GC/BC is a metaphor. ACAB. and they aren't elected to help us but to represent us. they fail, but like i said, one side is rushing to put everything to an end and the other is at least making a poor showing of keeping up the pretense.
Well, they shouldn’t be getting paid for it (or accept “accommodations”)
But I wouldn’t mind if they flacked for something relatively inoffensive at fundraisers.
Cancer research? Subsidized childcare in poor neighborhoods? Alma mater scholarship funding?
There's a lot of apolitical fundraising.
Irrelevant. Any one of those organizations can still find themselves needing to defend their position in court. Just because it's not a political issue doesn't change the presence of bias.
Clarence Thomas aside for one second…
How the hell did this article get past an editor’s desk without a single “Kochella” pun in it.
J. Jonah Jameson would have someone packing their desk for this. The headline writes itself.
Someone get me a picture of Spider Thomas at that event!
Who's fucking bright idea was lifetime appointments? This is absurd. An un-fireable public servant who is obviously corrupt and we all sit here like "wish we could do anything but the founding fathers..." What the fuck is this?
I really hope it was called Koch-chella
One would think the violent right wing extremists would do something about this but I guess they’re too busy harassing Librarians. Or are they just masquerading as patriots?
Harassing librarians is part of their patriot cosplay
Clicked the link and now I'm wondering why that girl has no belly button.
Clarence is for sure a piece of trash, though.
Edit: Mobile, so typing.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Still, a new investigation from ProPublica uncovered his recent participation in a fundraiser hosted by the Koch brothers in the same desert valley in Southern California.
Per the publication, a network of nonprofits handled by Charles Koch, an influential conservative, hosts its largest fundraiser in the Coachella Valley every winter.
Aside from being incredibly exclusive, the Koch Network's principal event is also extremely private, per ProPublica: Organizers rent out entire hotels and meticulously shred any documents on-site.
In 2018 — just like Queen Bey a few miles away — Thomas was one of the headliners at the event, this one at the Renaissance Esmeralda Resort and Spa in Indian Wells.
A high-level staffer with the Koch brothers' nonprofit network told ProPublica that Thomas attended dinners with the wealthiest donors and even gave guests a look into his judicial philosophy.
Thomas did not list the trip on his 2018 financial disclosure — a recurring theme for the Justice — and a former federal judge who spoke to ProPublica said his attendance, while not illegal, does raise questions about his conflicts of interest when handling Supreme Court cases with ties to the brothers.
The original article contains 447 words, the summary contains 191 words. Saved 57%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Dude is untouchable. Why are we bother with this? It’s just pushing people off for no reason.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News