this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
162 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1552 readers
147 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 113 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"As you can see, the computer clearly indicates I'm the winner of this discussion. Once you've talked to the AI and understand your failures, we can talk."

Sounds like he's a lot of fun.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago

The instant somebody releases a chat GPT powered sex doll I bet he'll be the first person in line with a pre-order.

[–] [email protected] 81 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

This is twenty percent logic, ten percent myope

Fifteen percent concentrated power of cope

Five percent incel, fifty percent lame

And a hundred percent reason to forget his name

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

I see you're a person of culture. I like it

[–] [email protected] 79 points 2 months ago

This is somehow even sadder than "I have depicted you as the wojak".

"I contracted the least efficient computer possible to depict myself as the chad, therefore I win."

[–] [email protected] 75 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"When I have a disagreement with a girl, I hit my balls with a hammer. There is absolutely nothing she can do; it's a brutal mog."

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

"brutal mog, sir"

[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

jesus fuck so many parts of this are psychic injury

the account name, the presumption of "oh yeah my opinion is right", the very nature of this person's "engagement" (quotes intentional) with conflict, the deference to non-authority (holy fuck how the fuck is it that we have worse than the personal-abdication of christianity (oh right, it's mcfuckingsaltman's fault)).....

I want to say "some of these people are in desperate need of a hug", but then as a friend of mine pointed out recently: "maybe if they weren't all such self-loathing pieces of shit they may actually get a hug"

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

jfc I just noticed the account name 🤦

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

The Dao that posts through it on Twitter is not the true dao

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

1000% chance it's Distributed Autonomous Organization (cryptoshit) and not the one and true Way.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Shit, someone make me a time machine so I can go make a joke back in 2016 when it would have been relevant.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

Ah the obvious telltale sign of AI writing, the misspelling of focuses. Gets em every time.

And now I've learned that focusses is a thing in places. placces. placesses.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

I think he would definitely win her back if he told her that she “foci too much on the past”

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Does all AI use American English? Focusses is an acceptable variant in various other regions.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

I think ChatGPT uses Nigerian English (see also: delve)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

focuses

I have not heard nor seen this before, is it really that consistently misspelled?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Almost as often as "dices", I'd wager. 🤢🫢

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

¿Qué dices?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

It's a rarely used British English version.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It’s weird he didn’t say “female” instead of “girl”. Are they finally learning that that one’s a giveaway & women avoid them because of it?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

AI told him not to use that word

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Imagine how mad they would get if the chatbot actually told him this. "Woke!"

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

He’s on the hunt for that one special female who’s really, really into Ferengi.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Still called her a girl though. Unless he’s really dating someone underage. I guess he might be.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Idk boy/girl are pretty commonly used to describe youngish adults, especially romantic partners.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

True, but he seems like the kind of person who would say man and girl.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 months ago

self-dodging bullet

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago

RATIONAL/LOGICAL
You: 80 (superior tactics)
Her: 15 (emotional, reactive)

EMOTIONAL REGULATION
You: 70 (cold, intermittent bursts of anger)
Her: 10 (in the middle of a panic attack)

VICTIM MENTALITY
You: 0 (the exact opposite of a victim and knows it)
Her: 85 (default mode of victimhood)

CONFLICT HANDLING
You: 100 (extremely direct)
Her: 30 (focusses on past, but quick to refocuss priorities)

HIT POINTS
You: 100 (full health)
Her: 15 (bleeding out from a gunshot wound, about to pass out)

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago

Men will do anything except go to therapy

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Classy. It's funny they're trying to "reach AGI" with all this shit but they code the bots with the equivalent of Jordan Peterson's take on how emotionality is a sickness. Well plaid (SIC).

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (3 children)

always remember that the "B" in "Jordan B Peterson" is for "Benzos"

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

I thought it was lo🅱️sters

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

I thought it was for Bozo

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

i thought it was for "Balthazar"

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago

She's entitled to a "default mode of victimhood"! She is your victim!

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago

How interesting, a volcel who only thinks he’s an incel. Many such cases

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago

"Your mother was volatile with poor control last night, Trebek!"

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

How to win the battle but lose the war.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago

i think she was clearly the winner there too

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

If you classify your relationship as a war, maybe you really shouldn’t have one.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

...and then I pack up my juicer, my humidifier, my dehumidifier, and leave.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a wonderful opportunity to use this douchebag's creds to rack up ridiculous charges on his OpenAI account then ghost him.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago

I just read something the other day that a single query like this one burns enough electricity to charge an iPhone 100 times or whatever the hell. It sounds like hyperbole but I think that number is close.

This is how humankind ends. A guy asking a fucking computer to validate his insecurity infinite times. This is how ai ultimately destroys us.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Your significant other now knows what it's like to date a computer, this is not a compliment.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago