It's under attack.
as many people has are able should have archives of the web archive.
It's such a huge undertaking, though, that instead for over a decade now we've just been losing data by the truckload daily
this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
13 points (100.0% liked)
History
1 readers
8 users here now
an mbin magazine for all things related to history
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
@[email protected] Yep, it's challenging and sad. Even Wikipedia use it as a resource and backup of sources.
And there are also those using it to archive copyright infringement, or as a record of a work's license at the time (specially since some loves to change the license when they originally released it in Creative Commons or the Public Domain).
It's crazy though that there was no service as close to the features archive.org has. The only one I'm aware of available publicly is archive.ph / archive.md but they don't offer the archiving of links found, and it's pretty much very static only (TiddlyWiki sites don't work correctly).
T_T
ಠ︵ಠ
They were hacked and user data was stolen, they're also under a DDoS attack.
All the reports I've seen seem to indicate that the archive data is safe, just publicly inaccessible ATM.
I wouldn't say it's the end of an era, but also standing up "an archive of Web Archive" is going to be impractical unless someone has a couple million to burn. Last I saw they stood at 40 PBs (Yes, Petabytes, or 40,000 TBs)
@[email protected] Wow. That's including the books they archived? Or, just the websites?
O_O I didn't hear about the user data issue.
Hmm… I wonder how long it has been going on. It took a couple of weeks before I got a reply from them that an admin unintentionally deleted my account, now that you mentioned it, my account probably got squeezed between spam accounts or something. (I was just advised to create a new account, and sadly only lists can be restored. T_T )