542
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 11 points 15 hours ago

Let's make an actual useful AI that detects ads and muted/blacks out the screen during ads. Haha

[-] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago

Comskip, it's not AI, and it works fine.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago

When Twitch this I rented a VPS in Russia that costs me $3 a month. I now route all my traffic through it and have no ads in Twitch (and im assuming YT too now?)

[-] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago

No you have to switch your vpn to Albania to avoid YouTube ads.

[-] [email protected] 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The article makes it sound like a new concept, but it's a very old approach for adding ads to video streams. I mean, it's essentially how regular TV works.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

I just hope they don't start running commercials during the streams like quarter and half screen commercials over top the existing content. A lot of TV channels started doing that when DVRs first popped up.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago

Oh well.

YouTube can be past-tense. There's a million places to post a video these days. Spill out some whiskey and read a book. Fuck em.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

That's exactly what I started doing this year. I've read 32 books already and it gives me much more satisfaction than watching stupid "like & subscribe to my patreon" videos.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

Agreed, it's just hard to find a suitable replacement for many things like tvs, since there's a lack of alternative apps for other platforms on things like roku or LG tvs

[-] [email protected] 1 points 54 minutes ago

It all sounds insane to me because I treat every TV like a computer monitor. Whatever I plug into it is what it displays. I usually ignore the onboard software as much as possible.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago

I'm really curious if they can make video injection of ads cost effective.

It feels like mangeling video streams into one, potentially re-encoding the video as they go... sounds expensive

[-] [email protected] 7 points 15 hours ago

Video encoding works by combining key frames, the whole picture and delta frames, what and how it changed. As long as you swap the stream at a key frame there is no need for a reencoding.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

Why would it involve re encoding?

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

Only if premium did not have ads. They show you ad videos as if they’re part of your “recommendations”. They also allow creators to get sponsorships within videos. So even the premium experience isn’t really ad-free and they tout that shit everywhere.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 19 hours ago

i would consider paying for premium if they broke out the payments properly, i don't fucking want youtube tv youtube music or whatever other bullshit is attached, just fucking get rid of the ads and charge me like 5 bucks a month and i'll fuck off.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago

Odysee (they said no to ads recently)

Rumble, Peertube

To follow creators you could try GrayJay https://grayjay.app/

[-] [email protected] 5 points 19 hours ago

until it stops working, yt-dlp and jellyfin.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

Wouldn't yt-dlp be forced to download the server-side ads, too?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

There is software for commercial detection and removal from static MP4. That's not a hard problem to solve.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

I'm surprised it took them so incredibly long to crack down on adblockers.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

They used to still be only a small percentage until the entire internet got completely decimated by ads in the past 5 years.

[-] [email protected] 48 points 1 day ago

So, instead of iterating the ancient concept of frontal assault ads towards something less intrusive and more engaging, they go the black mirror path of force feeding ads?

Sounds about right regarding the decision makers have as much creativity as a Vogon.

Man I really hate those suit MBA circlejerk idiots in positions of power.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

The sad thing is they inject ads to your feed even if you have premium. I keep seeing product videos in my feed named “Meet the x product”. Youtube and google is just shameless and I’m pretty sure they’re breaking a bunch of laws.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So YouTube Premium is as worthless as I thought. Google was never great in drawing recognizable lines between their free offering and paid... and it seems their solution is to make everything as shitty as possible and barely fix the stuff they fucked up.

Let's wait until Google Maps gets ads .... routing already seems fishy to me.

Thanks for your brief description... only shows me that my next Phone won't be a Pixel.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Definitely avoid Pixels. They look better than most Android devices in terms of software imo, although it’s because they’re really locking down the firmware similar to iOS, which breaks the purpose of using Android anyway. Also the processor on the Pixels are even behind 5-6 year old phones.

Btw…Google Maps has ads already, the square icons are all ads paid by the place owners. Routing is fishy yes, because they’re actively routing people through different routes in order to collect data for their algorithms.

The biggest reason I still use Google products is there is no alternative and they fully know this.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I got a Pixel 6 because I wanted to try something new .. it will probably be my last Pixel.

If there is a phone out there with Lineage/Cyanogen (or whatever it's called now) out of the box with decent HW, I would prefer that.

The last 2 years changed Google. They feel hollow like a blimp. Looking big but no real oomph any more.

[-] [email protected] 294 points 1 day ago

So if YouTube is now serving up the ads directly to me, does that mean they're finally liable for the content of those ads? Can we have them investigated for all the malware, phishing, illegal hate speech, etc.?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago

no because of sec 230 and publisher rights, they were still directly serving them before, the only difference now is that it's tied into the video stream directly, rather than broken out as a second one.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

In the past they have always said that they aren't transmitting the content and so it's the responsibility of the transmitter of the data. Now the content at least appears to be coming from youtube not the advertisers. So I'm curious if that's enough to make it fall under section 230 which would require that they make a good faith effort to remove "objectionable" content.

[-] [email protected] 72 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

No, because that would be communism, and that killed 100 million people. You also think genocide is bad, aren't you? And besides of that, if there were less regulations, you could make your own video platform to challenge Google's monopoly! /s

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 288 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ads will always be detectable because you cannot speed up or skip an ad like you can the rest of the video.

If they do make it so you can speed up or skip the ad sections of a video, mission accomplished.

If all else fails, I'd enjoy a plugin that just blanks the video and mutes the sound whenever an ad is playing. I'll enjoy the few seconds of quiet, and hopefully I can use that time to break out of the mentally unhealthy doom spiral that is the typical YouTube experience.

load more comments (30 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
542 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

58246 readers
5072 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS