this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
480 points (95.6% liked)

Today I Learned

17669 readers
702 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

the full line being "Give us today our epiousion bread"

Today, most scholars reject the translation of epiousion as meaning daily. The word daily only has a weak connection to any proposed etymologies for epiousion. Moreover, all other instances of "daily" in the English New Testament translate hemera (ἡμέρα, "day"), which does not appear in this usage.[1][2] Because there are several other Greek words based on hemera that mean daily, no reason is apparent to use such an obscure word as epiousion.[4] The daily translation also makes the term redundant, with "this day" already making clear the bread is for the current day.[21]

i don't think wikipedia mentions this but it has 'pious' in the middle

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 166 points 1 year ago (9 children)

It was an oral history in one language, written down into another by low quality scribes, then translated a couple more times.

Which is why it's always hilarious people say they have to take any translation literally.

[–] [email protected] 94 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But you don't understand! This translation was divinely inspired! Every other one is an act of heresy and blasphemy!

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Catholics go one step further. Both the translation and the tradition of interpreting the translation is divinely inspired. Protestants sometimes vaguely point to something like that but most realize that if they follow the logic train of sacred tradition they should be Catholic or Orthodox.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

The book was produced by the tradition. If the tradition is junk, then why would the book not be junk too?

This is one thing that atheists often get wrong about Catholicism. Catholics don't believe sola scriptura, the Protestant principle that all Christian tradition is to be rooted in the text of the Bible. Thus, "Bible contradictions" and the like are not rebuttals to Catholic views the way they are to "fundamentalist" Protestant views.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Evangelicals are all about that inspired, literal, complete, and inerrant word of God stuff. 99% of all evangelical churches have that as a mission statement on their website.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless they realize that each new interpretation is Divinely inspired. In which case the most recent one is the truest, Tradition is dead, and also the Divine changes Her mind a lot.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

The Jehovah's Witnesses have an update process they call "progressive revelation" so that they can keep retconning their doomsday prophecies.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

"This translation was divinely inspired."

"Oh, dope, so you're gonna sell all your stuff and give the money to the poor?"

"Okay, listen..."

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's a two-thousand-year-long multilingual game of Telephone. How much is it even possible is left from what was originally written? (And none of it contemporary to when it supposedly happened.)

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Textual critics are fairly confident that a fair amount of the texts of the New Testament were reliably copied until we get to the first extant manuscripts, and for the stuff that is very obviously messed up, they have a decent set of analytical tools that help them retroject the likeliest original wording. Not perfect, but decent.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

That's not how translation works though. The modern translations come directly from the original Greek and Aramaic.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The texts travelled all over the East and into Europe. So we can compare them. They were very clearly written in their time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 136 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Greek guy here.

Επιούσιος (e-pi-u-si-os) is a composite word (you can make an astronomical number of composite words in Greek if you want to express a new concept, such as tele-phone) and in this sentence it means that which will nourish us for the day. So daily is quite fitting here.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So it's more like "our day's worth of bread" than "the bread we eat every day"?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

"I'd like my daily ration today". Sounds bitchy like that.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

If the word was missing from the sentence, then it could be translated as "Give us today our bread and forgive our sins.....".

Instead, with the word added, it can be translated as "Give us today the bread we need for the day and forgive our sins..... ".

I guess the significance of the word is in not being greedy and asking from God only what you really need instead of what is "owed" to you?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Nourishing makes sense... Particularly in a context similar to edifying.

[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 year ago (3 children)

epiousion was greek for sliced

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It means "pan-fried, with an egg in the middle", you dolt!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

YOU FUCKING HEATHEN

IT MEANS DIPPED IN EGG THEN PAN FRIED

ANYTHING ELSE IS BLASPHEMY AND YOU WILL BURN FOR ETERNITY

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Hence the common phrase, best thing since epiousion bread. I thought it was obvious, I guess I'm the only one that drew the conclusion

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

And we've been comparing how good other things are to it ever since

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm fluently bilingual in English and Spanish, and I grew up going to a Spanish speaking Presbyterian church. The kids in my high school taught me that "pan" (the spanish word for "bread") was slang for "pussy", so everytime my grandpa (the pastor) recited the Lord's prayer, I always had a huge smile on my face thinking about him asking God to give us our daily allowance of pussy.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's hilarious. It makes sense for pan just to be a shortened 'panocha'.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago

Also known by one of the most badass-sounding terms in lexicography: the HAPAX LEGOMENON

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think it means "cromulent".

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't argue the classical Greek etymology, but the argument about redundancy flies in the face how I was taught the Lord's prayer. "Give us this day our daily bread" ~= "Give us our bread today as you do every day".

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I always took it as sort of like the amount of bread you need every day being "daily bread" and getting it every day.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now it occurs in a post on lemmy

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

And so shall it echo across the fediverse, amen

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I have only this moment realised that the prayer is referencing the xtian communion giving of bread symbolism, and not just randomly demanding food as if the writer was hungry

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is it, though? Or is it saying "Give us our basic staple needs"? It would be useful if a theologian could chip in on the dates, but I suspect this prayer predates bready communion

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

From my brief and poorly remembered Christian education, there were at least 3 occasions where the Big J handed out food and drink, and made explicit connection between his god powers, and the catering. So the idea was there in some form from at least the writing of the gospels. But yeah, it would be good to hear from someone who actually knows what they're talking about.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Historically? All of this is at least disputed. Within the church canon? "[Jesus] broke the bread, gave it to his disciples and said 'Take this, all of you and eat it, for it is my body, which will be given up for you.' When [the last] supper had ended he took the cup. Again he gave thanks and praise, gave the cup to his disciples and said 'Take this, all of you, and drink from it. For it is my blood, the blood of the new covenant which will be shed for you and for all so that sin may be forgiven."

Theologically speaking it's not a matter of debate at all that communion predates Christ's death and therefore the founding of the Church or the establishment of the Lord's prayer.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If I remember correctly, there's a group of scholars that translate it as "appropriate."

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Fun story! They came to that conclusion because they discovered a text which had what they believed was another very similar word ("epiousi") that, in context, meant "necessary" or "enough for now." That text was a shopping list.

Then the text got lost for a long time, and when they found it again, new eyes on it realized that they'd misread the word, so it was back to square one.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Some denominations, Eastern Orthodox in particular, do translate it as "our needed bread, give us today"

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

"How do you like your bread?"

"Appropriate"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Let me tell you, 10 year old me in catholic school really thought he was on to some comedy gold when he realized this day and daily was some confusing shit.

Nobody ever laughed. Turned out, I'm not really funny.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The daily translation also makes the term redundant, with "this day" already making clear the bread is for the current day

Yes, but it doesn't make it clear that it is something you receive every day. If I say "give us our pizza today" it doesn't imply that I have a daily pizza party (I don't, just a silly example).

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Cowardice, Fear, and Self-Loathing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I think I'll stick to 'fresh' or 'sourdough' as alternatives from now on

load more comments
view more: next ›