182
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago

I heard someone say once that if this was Europe the Republicans would actually be three different parties and the Democrats would probably be five.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 17 hours ago

Or conservatives could just fuckin get with the times.

I have yet to see a single conservative from any country hold any values that don't just hurt everyone.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The results will not change until your toxic tail stops wagging the dog.
By which I mean your online and 24-hour hysterical anti-news infotainment excrement factory.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

A second conservative party that disowns Traitorapist Trump would be a political earthquake. Conservatives would then be 100% certain that MAGA is making them lose.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

Yea that's what I was thinking. With the headline. Why don't the sensable adult conservatives just move over to a new party.

[-] [email protected] 81 points 1 day ago

If she actually means it then she should be pushing for ranked choice voting. There’s no other way for politicians who aren’t part of the two major parties to win.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 18 hours ago

There’s no other way for politicians who aren’t part of the two major parties to win.

That's totally fine. The short term reason for a new conservative party is to split the vote and insure the MAGA GOP cannot win. The medium/long term goal would be to replace the GOP as one of the 2 major political parties, just like when the GOP replaced the Whig Party. The way this would happen would be for a significant number of incumbant GOP senators and congressmen to announce they are moving to the new conservative party.

[-] [email protected] 51 points 1 day ago

"If we nominate Trump, we will get destroyed ... and we will deserve it"

Lindsey Graham, 2016

[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago

They have one, they're called Democrats.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

America is damage. Get the money out of politics!

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

maybe we can agree to bisect both parties at once

[-] [email protected] 7 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Ooo, four parties? I like that. BUT they all get new names and no one is auto-registered.

Name suggestions:

  • Conservative Traditionalist (god)
  • Libertarian (me, me, me)
  • Progressive (us)
  • Centrist (the rich)
[-] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

Easier. Let's just do political parties by financial status. But swaps representations to be proportionate to populace of each status.

70% representatives poor party 29.9% middle class 0.1% unobtainable dragon hording wealth.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago

We could always ban all political donations and ban superpacs. Money != politics

Lobbyists go to jail.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Yea I think that boulder would be easier to push than the mountain I just suggested lol

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Trump has been hollowing out the Republican party and filling it with his minions for the last 8 years. If they lose this election badly enough, I wouldn't be surprised to see some intense infighting and a big push to clean out a lot of Trump's people. While it's not inconceivable that you could see an offshoot try to replace the Republicans, I doubt it would happen. I think it's more plausible that the die hard MAGA idiots that can't read the room will get purged in favor of those who can at least appear to be more traditional, establishment Republicans. The party changes (as they do over time) but it doesn't go away.

Of course, I think the most likely outcome is that any rise of more moderate Republicans isn't going to be sufficient to fully dislodge the MAGA loyalists and you'll just see a much deeper divide. Without pressure from Trump constantly crushing them down, the more moderate side of the party can probably be more effective in uniting against the extreme right wing, but not enough to fully take over.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago

While it’s not inconceivable that you could see an offshoot try to replace the Republicans, I doubt it would happen.

It really depends heavily on timing. If Trumpism fades almost immediately after the election, the GOP can probably survive. If not, there is a good chance of it being replaced. All that would need to happen would be 2 critical steps. (1) A few big conservative big names announce the formation of a traditional conservative party that rejects Trumpism. (2) Over the next couple of years a wave of incumbant GOP senators and congressmen announce they are moving to the new party to break free of MAGA. That new party might still caucus with the GOP but would have a huge amount of leverage over it.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

I first read that headline as "is deranged."

Same sentiment but more precise.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

I’m just hoping that the collapse of the GOP ushers some leftward movement for once

[-] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

The political pendulum always swings back and forth. We are way overdue for a big swing to the left.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

That's not usually how it works. Democrats serve Wall Street and Silicon Valley first, but make concessions to Main Street as necessary to keep Republicans from taking over. The less of a threat Republicans are, the less incentive establishment Democrats have to put the needs of voters ahead of their sponsors.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago

Democrats serve Wall Street and Silicon Valley first

Then how come Biden raised corporate taxes? How come every Dem voted against Trump's gigantic tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy? Following the money cuts thru all the vague claims and bullshit and provides clarity.

The less of a threat Republicans are, the less incentive establishment Democrats have to put the needs of voters ahead of their sponsors.

That is the exact opposite of how politics work. The one and only thing that will result is a big shift to the left is for Dems to win over and over and over.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

I’m 100% with you. I just have (delusional) hopes of a sea change, and that is never historically a safe bet

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Damaged? Damaged???

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Home run by Liz Cheney.

Ranked choice, alternative vote, single transferable vote, let's do it.

[-] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago

The way Kamala Harris is running her campaign (towards the right), I would venture to say they're taking over the Democratic party. Kamala was really emphasizing her endorsement from the war criminal, Dick Cheney 🤮

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Conservatives took over the Democratic party over 30 years ago. Progressives have just recently started inching themselves back into relevance.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago

Conservatives took over the Democratic party over 30 years ago

The Democratic Party was much more conservative 30 years ago than today.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

I don't know why people forget this. Bill Clinton was a straight-up conservative. Do people not remember that?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Came here to say this. Conservatives mostly have a party: the democrat party.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago
this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
182 points (97.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1834 readers
668 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS