182
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

maybe we can agree to bisect both parties at once

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ooo, four parties? I like that. BUT they all get new names and no one is auto-registered.

Name suggestions:

  • Conservative Traditionalist (god)
  • Libertarian (me, me, me)
  • Progressive (us)
  • Centrist (the rich)
[-] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

Easier. Let's just do political parties by financial status. But swaps representations to be proportionate to populace of each status.

70% representatives poor party 29.9% middle class 0.1% unobtainable dragon hording wealth.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

We could always ban all political donations and ban superpacs. Money != politics

Lobbyists go to jail.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Yea I think that boulder would be easier to push than the mountain I just suggested lol

this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
182 points (97.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1834 readers
674 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS