What a twat. So what are the bets on how long it will be until they get proof that he has logged into his phone and this is all bollocks?
12 hours, 24 hours something like that?
Then he'll say in public something like 'this is utter and absolute poppy piffle' and in private he'll say sorry and think up what his next line of sorry not sorry bs is going to be. It's what he's always done.
It is being held at a solicitors. He does not have access to it without. If he requests access, then it will be recorded.
To be fair that's exactly what everyone should say when someone asks to look at your personal info!
True, but most people aren't the former Prime Minister. I can't read the article, because fuck paying any money to any of Murdoch's outlets, but is it his personal phone, or one that was provided in his official capacity as PM?
I can't either so I'll have to speculate. I imagine it must be a personal phone, because a government-provided one should be accessible by their sysadmin so Johnson's password wouldn't be required. Despite his public act he's not an idiot, so his personal phone probably will be encrypted, but I imagine the default iPhone encryption won't be able to outlast the police's resources if they really want to get in.
It'll almost certainly be his personal phone. A recurring issue with the tory government has been that they use their personal phones for government business.
The thing is if it were you or I being investigated, we'd have the RIP Act thrown at us with the threat of a custodial sentence, no doubt, for not revealing the password.
Which in it self is an offence. https://www.saunders.co.uk/news/prosecuted-for-your-password/
Not that I agree with this law, but it should be applied to our ex PM who brought in similar laws
Would that apply in this kind of thing? I.e it's not a criminal matter
What you mean as in government asking for your password and you telling them you can't give it up. OFC it applies. The problem is the impetus from government to enforce the law.
I meant as in it's an inquiry not a criminal case, so wasn't sure how much they could compel someone to release it. If the law is applicable though then yeah it's not a good look for the government not to be seen to enforce it.
There does not need to be a criminal offence pending for a search warrant to be issued. There only needs to be evidence that a crime could have been committed. Select committees hold the same weight as a criminal court. There are some ancient laws that are reputed to give them sentencing powers. They now rely on courts to process any wrong doing. It is a similar to the authority of the crown. We know the king can do certain things, but he won't because of the shit storm it would cause afterwards.
Non paywall version here :
nice! thanks for this.
It's definitely 00769.
I imagine "sorry I forgot my password" comes up a lot in police investigations, I imagine it wouldn't slow down the computer forensics team much.
Forget the forensics guys, if he keeps this up they'll be prepping the rubber hose and dentistry tools guys.
Perhaps we could skip the forensics?
Phones are well encrypted, they need the password
No, you can crack them with the right forensic tools, it just costs. I imagine of they tell BoJo they can unlock his phone but they'll charge him £50k to do it, he'll "find" his password tucked down the side of a mistress.
Only if the phone hasn't been powered off or "locked-down"
And as we all know, we can trust what he says
That photo of Boris is great. No really a ladies' man... more like my Nan.
isn't that a bit mean on your nan?
His nan is Margaret Thatcher.
Blimey! I hope not. :)
He's such a slippery, floppy haired git. The pins probably his mistress of the times measurements
I will save everyone a lot of time, it's 69420
The phone can be imaged then brute-forced, I imagine that this is more distraction. I'm not sure how but then I didn't really understand the whole cardboard bus thing.
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.