this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
550 points (98.8% liked)

Privacy

32465 readers
420 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Signal is being blocked in Venezuela and Russia. The app is a popular choice for encrypted messaging and people trying to avoid government censorship, and the blocks appear to be part of a crackdown on internal dissent in both countries..."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 174 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

It’s like a medal of honor for a privacy preserving app πŸ˜„

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Indeed. If whatsapp isn't on the list, then I have all the confirmation I need.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The Russian government has also allegedly begun preparations to block the WhatsApp messaging app.

https://kyivindependent.com/messenger-signal-blocked-in-russia-media-says/

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Some US bank got in trouble for using it internally.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Zucks check didn't clear yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago

"Banned in 15 dicatorships!"

[–] [email protected] 46 points 4 months ago (7 children)

could matrix.org be as easily blocked, since it's decentralized I'm wondering?

At least it means that Signal is working as intended if they are blocking it, I guess that they don't have back doors.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Being decentralized prevents DNS or IP blocks but not blocks through DPI.

Signal has an option to masquerade it's traffic as regular HTTPS, I don't know if Matrix can do such a thing.

https://x.com/signalapp/status/1821979304626155930

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 months ago (6 children)

I can answer this! All matrix calls are over https APIs. Ports and addresses are stored in a text file on the base domain or in DNS txt entry.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Matrix is in fact decentralized but in reality it is not so much, I don't know the number exactly but the majority of users use the matrix.org server

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (8 children)

Those numbers only include instances that have telemetry enabled

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

People who live in countries where DNS and IP blocks are common probably use a different server. I've been running my own for over a year and it works like a dream

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

could matrix.org be as easily blocked, since it’s decentralized I’m wondering?>

Or SimpleX?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

It cannot be easily blocked especially if you use your own homeserver every homeserver replicates the channel and it can operate without the original server! That's why signal and telegram are inherently flawed.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago

Signal honored!

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Would peer to peer apps be resistant to this sort of thing?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but you'll have to install them from sources other than what governments deem official. Like F-droid.

Now, if they block p2p traffic that's a different story

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

I am totally cool with F-droid.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It depends. Somehow it has to discover the peers. Other than that, they could block traffic between residential IP addresses and there goes large part of the P2P network

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Russia and Venezuela are huge hotbeds of piracy from populations without access or capital to access most forms of entertainment.

Breaking P2P in this manner would basically be getting rid of the circus part of bread and circuses. Not a good move for an authoritarian.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago (5 children)

why telegram is not blocked? makes you think...

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (2 children)

WhatsApp supposedly uses Signal protocol.

Why is THAT not blocked? Certainly they wouldnt roll their own encryption and bypass Signal security protocols after having Moxie come in, right? Right????

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Russia is reportedly planning to block WhatsApp as well.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

It is owned by Meta and is proprietary

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

Telegram is not secure, I guess if you can listen to it better not block it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I mean it was blocked before Signal was blocked. Russia somewhat famously badly broke their Internet trying to shutdown telegram... and eventually gave up.

I'm guessing Signal finally has enough market share to get the Russian government's attention but not enough market share that they think the web of proxies that kept Telegram online will keep Signal online.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

On April 16, 2018, the Russian government began blocking access to Telegram, an instant messaging service. The blocking led to interruptions in the operation of many third-party services, but practically did not affect the availability of Telegram in Russia. It was officially unblocked on June 19, 2020

Some say it was unblocked because they made a deal with Durov. Another opinion is that too many people and services including officials continued to rely on it even during the time it was blocked. Regardless, Telegram did a huge job on circumventing those blocks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Honestly I would've expected it to be blocked much earlier

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Why countries that do not prosecute political dissent bock apps used by political dissenters? /s

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Matrix isn't secure depending on how you use it. It also doesn't protect individual identities terribly well.

Simplex Chat would be the better option however the main Simplex Chat server and matrix server could end up blocked as well.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Matrix is entirely self-hostable, and you can turn off both federation, and the requirements for any linkable identifiers.

Signal by contrast requires your phone number, isn't self-hostable, and is based in a five-eyes country.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Matrix doesn't protect metadata, which is arguably just as (if not more) important than message data. Signal by contrast does protect metadata and proper implements Perfect Forward Secrecy for all chats. I do think Signal's centralized design and phone number requirements problematic, but Signal still has many merits. Such as its massive user base for a AGPL-only project.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Matrix also implements Perfect Forward Secrecy, and that's been the case for a very long time: https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/162773/are-matrix-messages-encrypted-using-perfect-forward-secrecy

What do you mean by AGPL-only? Synapse is also AGPL. And you can only guarantee that there won't be projects with other licenses if you prevent them from existing.. which is not something to be desired

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

plenty of servers for both though

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Couldn't they block them too? Monitor the domains people connect to, check if it's a Matrix server and block it if it is.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Probably mostly because almost nobody uses it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί