This is great to see, also feels like a common sense approach? We don't cull humans to get rid of COVID, so why would we apply that logic to trying to stop bovine TB?
this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
36 points (97.4% liked)
UK Nature and Environment
426 readers
54 users here now
General Instance Rules:
- No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
- No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
- No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
- Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
- Do not spam or abuse network features.
Community Specific Rules:
- Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
- Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.
Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.
Our winter banner is a shot of Shotley marshes, Suffolk by GreyShuck.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
36
Vaccinating badgers more effective than culls in stopping bovine TB, study finds
(www.theguardian.com)
It was always common sense, but farmers don't like it because it's more expensive and time consuming than just culling them.
We don’t cull humans to get rid of COVID
And we also have difficulty convincing some to get the vac. Those kill others by spreading COVID.
This is very much the same question farmers face. They are legally required to kill herds of cows. If TB is discovered in the herd.
So it is very fair to answer the question of how the hell do we ensure the vac is applied to enough Badgers in the area.