What happans next?
McDonalds releases a new burger!
What happans next?
McDonalds releases a new burger!
If at any point after the forst 6 months. An MP has attended less then 75% of palimentary sessions. An automatic by election should happen.
Yeah so can my rather untalented dumb chihuahua. Well about 16 months as that is as long as I have had opportunity to test.
Just to be clear. They will still be lords. And si will their children.
It is the right to sit in the house that will go. Not the tittle.
As for the biggest hiredutory position. That already has no power. Just politicians still listen to it. So its those politicians we need to correct.
We already have rules andnlaws the companies are breaking.
And ofwat has not enforced.
Increasing the punishment only works if the companies believe enforcment will happen.
Ofwat needs the motivation. Ban pay rises etc for their bosses as well.
Given all it wants to do is life up and down.
If we make tbe huge assumption it has any idea what is happening.
Your wife is likely its actual intent.
Given water companies have sold off 30 reserviors since privatisation.
Do not give any credence to thair claim of needing huge increases in payments.
They have stolen money from the nation. While refusing to use it for maintenance.
Uk governments of both parties have allowed this. So object when they allow it to continue.
They owe us reservoirs and should go bankrupt and be renationalused at 0 value. If they cannot afford it.
Are these journalists actually saying anything ib support of hamas. Because is the crime they are accused of.
Protesting palistinion genocide is not supporting hamas. And to say it is would be prerty fucking racist of the police.
Yeah. If you read his letter (linked in the article) and look him up on network rail.
He is using government resources to threaten a company into having an engineer disciplined. But that misses some very important points.
The statement that the station is dangerously overcrowded has been published by the ORR government department of rail and road safety. So his statement to the press is a fact.
Given it is the government who make and enforce rules on over crowding and safety. The fact he shared is not a criticism of his companies' client Network Rail. But a criticism of the government and the minister's own department. IE, clearly a matter of political freedom of speech.
and maybe most importantly. Lord Peter Hendys last job. Chair of Network Rail from 2015 to 2023. So if he is write that this is Network Rails fault. As his own words state, he believes.
He is very clearly using government contracts and spending to threaten a private corporation into disciplining someone for criticizing his own career.
Honestly, the level of self entitlement and narcissism is insane. Almost tory level insane.
I have written to my MP expressing my disgust over this. And demanding, he questions the government over its legitimacy in parliament.
I really think every one neds to do so. Such that all MPs see how offended voters are by this action.
if they didn’t fire one engineer for doing his job. I
I am of the opinion no government minister should have the right to threaten government contracts over demads of a companies HR department on an indevidual.
And have written to my MP demanding he question the government o. This.
But if you. Read the letter. The engineer made declararions to the independent news paper.
PR is not his job. Ad engineer is not employed to make media anouncments as part of their job.
His actions were a personall choice. One I fully support.
But. Not part of his job.
If you read lord henly letter. (Linkked to in the article) the Minister is claiming this engineer is critisizing the companies clienr network rail.
This is false. He is commenting on train ovee crowding. This is not a network rail task. The tracks are their job.
It is instead a government job.
One they follow for animal welfare. As trains have limits for transporting animals.
No such laws exist for human transport.
So it is very very much the ministers department and parliment the enlgineer is critisizing. And a clear freedom of speach issue.
Please everyone write to your MP insisteing they question the government on this.
Nor can anyone in government make such decisions.
While parliment is sovereign. It can only overrode government if it votes as a majority to do so.
Translation. When one MP or a small group. Ask questions about security. One minister cannot answer it without breaking the law.
IE corbyn needs the majority of parliment to force any minister to release information on spying.
As much as I disagree on the actions over gaza. It is not reasonable to expect any government member to answer such questions without full parliamentary support.
They ain't listening. They just think it was done the wrong way.
Completely ignoring the fact, remainers told them all the promises were mutually exclusive. So 0 majority existed for any single way.
So what ever they consider the correct way. Would have lost the ref if stated at the time.