6
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Haaretz confirming reports and photos around the use of the Hannibal Directive on October 7th.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago

I’m confused. Is this article complaining that the IDF made poor decisions that put civilians at risk during the October 7 attack? As if this is some kind of a gotcha from the Palestinians point of view? This is so incredibly detached from reality that this it is nothing short of spectacularly disturbing.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This is an Israeli publication, I don't believe it's "complaining" or passing judgement. It contains first hand accounts from the IOF about the Hannibal Directive which was used repeatedly on October 7th. In other words, the IOF purposefully killing Israeli civilians and one another.

One case in which it is known that civilians were hit, a case that received wide coverage, took place in the house of Pessi Cohen at Kibbutz Be'eri. 14 hostages were held in the house as the IDF attacked it, with 13 of them killed. In the coming weeks, the IDF is expected to publish the results of its investigation of the incident, which will answer the question of whether Brig. Gen. Barak Hiram, the commander of Division 99 who was in charge of operations in Be'eri on October 7, was employing the Hannibal procedure. Did he order the tank to move ahead even at the cost of civilian casualties, as he stated in an interview he gave later to the New York Times?

this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
6 points (100.0% liked)

Israel and Palestine Politics Discussion

310 readers
15 users here now

The sole purpose of this community is to discuss Israeli and Palestinian issues. It is not the place for hurling insults, rehashing grudges, or making up history. Any conversation that veers into the "if only your people had" realm will be deleted or locked right away. I started this community in the potentially fruitless hope that we may have a civil conversation about this issue.

Rules:

  1. References to historical events must include a reputable source. The definition of reputable is up to the mods. Keep that in mind.
  2. Articles from reputable sources only.
  3. No name-calling. That's what DMs are for. /s
  4. Keep it in English. If I don't understand the word, it gets removed. Obvious exceptions would be the use of proper names and references. For example, "wadi" when used to refer to a place is acceptable.
  5. Discussions that are heading into the probability of becoming a flame war will be locked.
  6. Repeat offenders will be forced to find another community.
  7. Anti-Zionism is ok. Anti-Semitism is not.
  8. Whataboutism is for toddlers. Try to grow up.
  9. Posting articles about current events is encouraged. Posting the same story from 20 different sources is not.
  10. Posting an article purely for the purpose of saying "Look what monsters they are" is discouraged unless it can generate an honest discussion. This is probably the most difficult rule to follow.
  11. No calling anyone a terrorist.
  12. No YouTube links. Some of us can read.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS