SuckMyWang

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

That’s what I don’t get about this. The point is either to get out of paying or at least make it very difficult. At the same time the cost to Disney as a company with all the bad press and fall out from doing this would be orders of magnitude greater than simply paying the widower compensation. Who signed off on it? The idea that a lawyer can do what ever it takes to win a case while simultaneously destroying the company they work for seems dumb as shit from a purely financial point of view.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What about sideways?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

Left is in common sense units, right is in intelligence units. There is no “freedom” (to be ignorant) units though no.

Also sorry for the burn but it is a deserving burn at least.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Temperature of the body

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

That’s ridiculous, he’s obviously Jesus Christ.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 months ago

That not helpful to the narrative that Hamas who are made up of Palestinians and supported by Palestinian people are pure and innocent

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Snopes says this

What's True Tobacco enemas were a real and at one time popular medical practice thought to have been able to revive people who had drowned or were otherwise catastrophically ill. What's False However, the phrase "blow smoke up your ass" appears to have its origins more recently, in the 1960s, and there is no evidence linking it to the long-ago practice of tobacco enemas.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He’s making the fossil fuel industry look bad

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Get peasants to ask the fed? When has the fed ever given a shit about what peasants say

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes but Rittenhouse couldn’t have shot someone unless he felt in fear for his life. This isn’t like a cop putting 20 bullets in someone cause he thought his comb was a gun. He literally had a gun pointed at him. If this didn’t happen he would be a murderer. It did happen and the idiot who did this should share the blame of a stupid situation. It’s like people can’t comprehend there are shades of grey.

2
Old people (www.theguardian.com)
 

Not the exact wording but the general premise behind it is a fair counter point in any disagreement. When someone is attempting to gain a higher moral authority, bringing up any hypocrisy is a reasonable thing to do. If pointing out hypocrisy is then dismissed, it is reasonable to assume the other person is not arguing in good faith and therefore should no be taken seriously.

 
 
 
 
360
Animals. (lemmy.world)
 
71
It is. (lemmy.world)
 
 
 
 
view more: next ›