this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
256 points (99.6% liked)

World News

39019 readers
2162 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A U.S. jury in Miami has ruled that Chiquita Brands International is liable for financing the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC), a paramilitary death squad designated as a terrorist organization by the U.S. during Colombia's civil war.

This decision comes after 17 years of legal proceedings and a previous conviction in 2007 when Chiquita was fined $25 million for illegal payments to the AUC. The recent verdict marks the first time an American jury has held a major U.S. corporation accountable for complicity in human rights abuses in another country, newsletter Pirate Wire Services explained.

Plaintiffs represented by Earth Rights International, an NGO advocating for corporate responsibility, have long sought justice through courts in both Colombia and the United States regarding this issue. The jury in Miami recommended a civil fine of $2 million for each family member filing suit, following two "bellwether cases" selected from over a hundred filed by victims.

Court documents reveal that Chiquita paid 3 cents per dollar for each box of bananas exported from Colombia to the AUC, an organization responsible for thousands of civilian deaths, including the eradication of entire villages, the murders of trade union representatives and rivals, and the kidnapping of politicians. Victims and their families had lobbied for years to sue Chiquita in civil courts, efforts that the company delayed through various legal tactics.

In addition to the payments, victims and ex-AUC commanders claim that Chiquita provided weapons and gasoline to the paramilitary forces in the Urabá region of Colombia. They argue that Chiquita executives knew these resources were being used to kill civilians and suppress unions near their operations. Chiquita has denied these accusations, maintaining that the payments were extortion made under duress, an argument previously rejected by U.S. courts.

Chiquita attempted to move all civil cases to Colombian courts, but its motion was denied, and the cases proceeded in the U.S. In 2018, Colombia's Prosecutor's Office formally accused Chiquita executives of aggravated conspiracy to commit a crime and attempting to hide these payments as "security payments." The investigation was suspended in 2019 but may resume under Colombia's new lead prosecutor, Luz Adriana Camargo Garzón, who has expressed interest in the case.

The Colombian Peace Court has characterized Chiquita's actions, including labor union repression, as "crimes against humanity." The central issue in the U.S. civil court case was whether Chiquita's payments to the AUC materially assisted the group in its illegal actions.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The people responsible went to jail right?

Right?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

And found liable, so now families of victims of the group can also litigate.

Money won't bring back loved ones, but making this as painfully as possible means that these practices will diminish.

That said, it hopefully opens the doors for actual criminal investigation to throw in jail those responsible.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Corporations are people until jail time is involved

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 months ago (2 children)

BTW Coca-Cola also hired death squads to kill union members in Colombia

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

Thats why I drink Pepsi

checks Pepsi's corporate record

Fuck

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Never knew. Was that recent?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

There's a fun Behind the Bastards episode on this to a degree, the main subject was Edward Bernays but it covers the banana Republic stuff and then Swindled has episode 50 The Octopus that which is more directly focused on Chiquita and their bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They should.be banned from doing business in the U.S. This non-punishment from the court is encouragement to continue killing.

Why on earth would they even consider changing? The court has made murdering innocent people an extremely profitable business model.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Second time... as if the punishment didn't deter them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

This article makes it clearer.