this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
358 points (95.9% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3688 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 125 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Don’t you think he looks tired?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How come? He had a lot of sleep in NY.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

He looks like he ought to shoot himself in the face.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

One word. No, six. I could end your career in six words.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Take it with a grain of salt since the description is coming from an MSNBC host.

But she's right in that, when it comes to deciding sentencing, this will not do him any favors.

Maximum sentence is 4 years per count +$5,000 fine.

So he'll likely get multiple 4 year sentences, served concurrently, and $5K x 34... $170,000 fine.

[–] [email protected] 72 points 5 months ago (2 children)

He'll never see the inside of a cell. The legal system protects shit like him.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That's expected when you live in a corporatocracy masquerading as a democracy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Pipe dreams. It’s extremely rare for prison sentences to be imposed for white collar, non-violent e felonies like this.

Merchan isn’t going to impose a shit load of time just because people want it- that would pretty quickly get over turned by higher courts.

Most likely the best we can hope for is house arrest; the only reason we have a hope of jail time at all is that trumps behavior during and leading up to the trial (inciting his mob to threaten violence, refusal to abide gag orders.)

In some regards the house arrest might be politically the best for Trump. He can still broadcast his stupidity.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Again, look at the other people involved. Cohen got 3 years for his part in it, Alan Weisselberg, while not convicted for this, got 5 months for his role in another Trump ordered scheme.

So, yeah, it does happen for white collar crime. When you consider 34 counts and his lack of contrition, I can see the Judge hitting him with the max, which, granted, is only 4 years.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago

I’m being cautiously optimistic here, but I have to admit prison time is probably a long shot. Justice Merchan didn’t want to jail him on his ten instances of contempt, and I can understand wanting to avoid politicizing an already unprecedented trial and handing the defense reason for appeal. Given convicted felon Donald Trump’s behavior however, my personal prediction is something like house arrest and possibly a supervised release schedule. Total bullshit, but I do think Merchan has been playing the long game so that whatever sentence he hands down is airtight and holds up under appeal.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

A part of me hopes they fine him $130k. Fining him the exact amount he paid Stormy Daniels somehow feels like an even bigger "fuck you" than the maximum possible financial penalty.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago

So with the inflation adjustment, that looks like ... 172k today!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No, that won't do any rehabilitation. It needs to be jailed or maybe cleaning the highway.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

But then if he forges fake business records to pay the fine... :)

Hey, criminals do dumb stuff all the time...

https://youtu.be/BUp9_pHyEHo

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago

4 years, one for each year he was president.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

An analysis I read said NY almost never imprisons a first time fraud offender. If true then it's pretty unlikely he will be imprisoned at all.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago (5 children)

On one hand you're right about first time offenders, but on the other he's made it clear monetary fines don't dissuade him (e.g. the ten he got for his truth social attacks on the judge and co.) which could in turn influence the decision regarding jailtime.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Cohen was a first time offender and did 3 years for the same crime.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

This is patently untruthful.

First, Cohen’s conviction was federal. Trumps are state.

Second. Trump is convicted of fraudulent business records. Cohen was convicted of lying to a financial institution, tax fraud, unlawful corpo contributions, and excessive campaign contributions. (Source)

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago

Not the same crime, the same crime plus tax evasion and making false statements to a federally-insured bank.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I believe the maximum total is 4 years, not cumulative. And given that it’s his first conviction, and he has a campaign to run, the chance he’ll spend any time in jail at all is slim.

*edit: OP mentioned concurrently, so they said the same thing. Reading comprehension at 8 AM not booted up yet.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Concurrent means not cumulative

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Oops, my morning brain skipped over that word, thanks for pointing it out.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 5 months ago

Fat old convicted criminal looks tired.

More at 11.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Prisoner Elect.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Four years ago he was a deranged fascist with limited mental faculties. I don't think that dial has really moved.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Somehow he has actually gotten worse mentally

[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 months ago (1 children)

somehow? you mean like taking a very old demented person and adding four years?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

Yup, that'll do it

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Somehow, Palpatine has got worse.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Well, he's now also a convicted felon.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He looks like the Hamburglar chose the wrong grail.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He was only ever a shadow of what you thought he was, that's been the whole point the entire time, you are chasing shadows

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Now he's less more like a lighting artifact that stupid people think is a UFO.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

A shadow of what he was 4 years ago?

So a steaming pile of shit is now... Like dried turd?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Four years ago?

I can't tell the difference between his insane statements today, and his insane statements from 8+ years ago.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago

"They're the same picture"

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Dude is on so many drugs. It's like that episode of Simpsons when mr burns sees the doctor and the doctor tries to push a bunch of plushies through the door

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Indestructible...

load more comments
view more: next ›