1
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

She was going to be silenced, because if she lived, more people would be exposed

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

in socialism rich people have way less influence to snake out of consequences. good on them.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

If Vietnam has billionaires then why the f*ck were they fighting against capitalism in the Vietnam War? North Vietnam might as well have just asked to join South Vietnam and they could have skipped 20 years of wars. Looks like all they were really fighting against was democracy.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

They were not fighting against capitalism, they were fighting for independence. They didn't care who supported them, they just needed support. Because France was in the West, and had Western support, the only external support they could easily find was communist. So they put on the Communist hat, but they really cared about independence

The history is fascinating

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viet_Minh

the Việt Minh established itself as the only organized anti-French and anti-Japanese resistance group.[6] The Việt Minh initially formed to seek independence for Vietnam from the French Empire. The United States supported France. When the Japanese occupation began, the Việt Minh opposed Japan with support from the United States and the Republic of China. After World War II, the Việt Minh opposed the re-occupation of Vietnam by France, resulting in the Indochina War, and later opposed South Vietnam and the United States in the Vietnam War.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They were not fighting against capitalism, they were fighting for independence.

Both North Vietnam and South Vietnam gained their independence in 1954. So whatever they were fighting for in the 1960's, it was definitely not "independence".

The history is fascinating

Yeah, but I was talking about the Vietnam War against north and south of the 1960's. Not the separate colonial war against France in the 1950's.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That isn't how they saw the situation. Colonial powers drawing lines on maps has famously been a way to make people happy with outcomes

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLdUa84NB-3eiXhRtECg8mwCr6JDwgPtty&si=yC8tKjh058A9uxZo

Here is some fun documentaries to watch

[-] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That isn’t how they saw the situation

"They" == North Vietnamese propaganda. The actual facts are that colonialism ended 10 full years before the US sent troops to protect South Vietnam. This was a civil war, not a colonial war. It doesn't matter what North Vietnamese propaganda wants you to think. It matters what reality is. If all your information is coming from youtube you are definitely getting your information from the wrong sources.

Colonial powers drawing lines on maps has famously been a way to make people happy with outcomes

Doesn't apply at all here. The only 'border' they were fighting over was the border between North and South Vietnam. And that border was created by North Vietnam, not by any colonialists.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

Political power projection and the manuevering to hide corruption is the 'rich' equivalent in highly socialist systems. Smart adaptive people are not necessarily moral or ethical people, so regardless of economic system or government types, you will always have the worry of unscrupulous opportunists.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Don't kill them. Redistribute their wealth.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

In this particular case, she's hidden money overseas and the death penalty is being used to compel her to recover and return it.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

I am all for billionaires facing consequences for their actions. The death penalty is still deeply immoral though. Locking financial criminals up like for example the American state did with Martin Shkreli or Sam Bankman-Fried though is completely o.K. and should happen more often.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The death penalty is still deeply immoral though.

The decision is a reflection of the dizzying scale of the fraud. Truong My Lan was convicted of taking out $44bn (£35bn) in loans from the Saigon Commercial Bank. The verdict requires her to return $27bn, a sum prosecutors said may never be recovered. Some believe the death penalty is the court's way of trying to encourage her to return some of the missing billions.

It appears to be a method the courts are employing to encourage her to surrender overseas assets.

In this particular situation, that $27bn is over 5% of Vietnam's GDP. This is a very significant hit to the nation's financial stability and one that will likely result in substantial number of excess deaths entirely due to increased poverty. I can see the threat of execution as a method to compel repayment as necessary.

In a better world, foreign banks complicit in Truong's 11 year long theft would cooperate to return the stolen money, thereby making this threat unnecessary. But so long as foreign financial institutions can hold a nation's wealth hostage, all the Vietnamese state leadership can manage is to respond in kind.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Disclaimer: didn’t read the article yet.

But surely someone can’t commit such a huge fraud alone. Nobody at Saigon Commercial Bank is involved or culpable for loaning that amount to a fraudster?

[-] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

But surely someone can’t commit such a huge fraud alone.

Right. I'm less upset by a single individual facing execution than I am not seeing a dozen other crooks lined up on the docket.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Now do the other billionaires.

More seriously though, this is fucked up.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

Anyone worth more than a billion dollars is guilty.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

Some are more guilty than others, and she's definitely near the top of the list.

Still, curious to see what a Socialist country like Vietnam does when its prosecutors catch a person like Truong My Lan red handed. Its such a far cry from what American prosecutors did with offending bank managers after the 2008 Financial Collapse or the UK prosecutors who investigated the Wirecard scandal or the SEC/FCC responded to countless instances in which Elon Musk got caught manipulating stock prices.

Goes to show you what happens when your country has a tyrannical government and its billionaires don't enjoy any freedoms.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

I Propose we make any Fraud worldwide over a Billion Dollars punishable by Death to!

this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38581 readers
1662 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS