1
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
  • In short: Transgender woman Roxanne Tickle is suing social media platform Giggle for Girls after she was excluded from the women-only app.
  • She is alleging unlawful discrimination on the basis of gender identity while the app's founder has denied she is a woman.
  • What's next? The hearing is expected to run for four days.

A transgender woman who was excluded from a women-only social media app should be awarded damages because the app's founder has persistently denied she is a woman, a Sydney court has heard.

In February 2021, Roxanne Tickle downloaded the Giggle for Girls social networking app, which was marketed as a platform exclusively for women to share experiences and speak freely.

Users needed to provide a selfie, which was assessed by artificial intelligence software to determine if they were a woman or man.

Ms Tickle's photograph was determined to be a woman and she used the app's full features until September that year, when the account became restricted because the AI decision was manually overridden.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

I don't understand.

It's okay to discriminate against men but not transgender women?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

While I certainly agree with you that discrimination based on sex is unacceptable im most contexts, I believe that gender exclusive spaces, unless they hinder people directly, sometimes are a good thing.

My dad is a mental health professional and founded a weekly 'only-men' self help group. He found that some things they talked about there wouldn't have worked with women involved. That group existed for about 5 years or so and helped quite a few struggling men.

So yeah, unless there's any maliciousness involved, I'd argue that gender exclusiity is not bad in every context.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

If women have gender exclusive spaces, men also should have them. Women have invaded male spaces for decades.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

'Invaded' lol what. Dude the boys club is a real thing. And it's everywhere.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

In pretty confident this person would agree with you. They'd also say women shouldn't be allowed there. They don't want the boys club to go away and think it's being threatened because women are allowed in the workplace or whatever.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

I remember back in high school I had a teacher in an all male classroom because it was a stem field but for kids like an introductory course. A girl showed up in the 2nd year and he sort of joked about how it changes the dynamic cuz now all the guys will need to flex for her so the point of the class was sort of ruined. I remember that class was actually fucking amazing because you would make friends with guys regardless of your social circle or wealth background. Like I talked to multiple demographics and we all treated each other equally and we were all there to learn the trade. It was an amazing experience that I've never found anywhere else, especially not any circle where there were women. Hell even guys who were in that class there were a few if you met them outside the class it was just different. I made some close friends there where we kept spending time together outside the class that I otherwise would not have met but others when they got back to "the rest of the world" that hierarchy set back in and they couldn't bring themselves to talk to you on that level anymore. Women invading male safe spaces under the guise of glass ceilings or whatever was extremely toxic for men, it's as if men started barging into women's bathrooms honestly saying it's a glass ceiling to their right to stare at women in their own private moments. Stupid example but it's all I could come up with.

The point is I would love to find another environment like that and even I wish I looked for more like that as a kid and to have appreciated it for what it was more at the time. Men need to learn to see each other as brothers and not as opposition, that's the only way we get out of this mess is to unionize properly. I think we had it once but we lost it because of this fucking propaganda painting men as inherently predators.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

So.... Men act like dicks when there is a woman around or when they are back in "the rest of the world"? At which point their sense of brotherly love and cameraderie disappear? How is that a woman's fault?

How is that the fault of, "fucking propaganda painting men as inherently predators"?

Sounds like a problem with that group of men....

I have tons of male friends who dont "flex" or act like dicks when they are outside of an all-male setting

I'm not against men's clubs, btw.... But the idea that men cant be toxic outside of a men's club is a terrible premise for a men's club

[-] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Women invading male safe spaces under the guise of glass ceilings or whatever was extremely toxic for men, it's as if men started barging into women's bathrooms

So the class wasn't a "men only" class, it just was a class women generally weren't interested in. And a woman deciding she is interested was the same as men barging into women's bathrooms.

Jfc, who are the snowflakes again?

[-] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Oh, so was your entire story a lie too?

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago
[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Yes you’re right the transphobes are taking over here

[-] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago

Lol...what? I've read like 3 comments saying that the app is in the right, the overwhelmingly majority are siding with the trans...

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

I down voted, not because I disagree with the claim, but because it doesn't make any sense in the context and just reads as a knee-jerk dismissive response of a valid point.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

It's true though. Gender is a performance, and as a woman your womanhood is always under scrutiny from everyone else. You can get your identity as woman taken from you if you don't "look woman enough". Which if you say have more masculine features, cut your hair short as a cis woman you become less woman. For example Butch lesbians are actually the most often de-womanized. Same goes for less masculine men. It's a box no one fits into perfectly and having certain genitals doesn't include or exclude you from either.

This person wanted a safe space where they wouldn't have to deal with cis straight men. Which makes it that if men want inclusion in such spaces they need to be better.

Another question for you all, why as cis men do you want inclusion in these spaces?

[-] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago

So, what about those who are born with a uterus? Where can they go? What if they decide, only those who were born with a vagina at birth, are women and we want only those to be part of our organization? I mean, are they wrong?

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

"trans women are women" is pointing out this isn't about men vs women but the given sex at birth.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

We all accept that trans women are not cis women. The obvious point by the poster was why is it okay to discriminate against men but not trans women?

[-] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

Real /r/unpopularopinion moment.

I think the thing that the TERFs ultimately miss is that this person was initially welcomed in as a woman and treated as a woman by her peers. She did not disrupt the community or harass any of the participants, until she voiced support for Trans Rights.

It was at this point that a handful of moderators decided to interrogate her on her original gender and use that as an excuse to boot an active and in-good-standing member.

So she wasn't removed for "not being a woman". She was removed for "disagreeing with the political views of the admin".

Anyone familiar with Reddit politics should be able to sympathize.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago

I don't understand? Reddit politics is ultra liberal, they would eat this women's app alive for discriminating against the trans.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago

I define a woman as a female who has a uterus, how should I define them?

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

So if a woman has a hysterectomy, she is no longer a woman? What is she?

[-] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago

That's silly and you know it. She still had one to begin with. That's like saying "if a dude cuts off his penis, he's no longer a dude!"

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

I define a woman as a female who has a uterus

Your definition. Has a uterus. You said nothing about a female who had a uterus.

And you haven't defined female.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago
[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

It's not my fault that your definition excluded women who had a uterus at one time but didn't later.

How about women who have two X chromosomes but were born without a uterus? Not women?

[-] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago

Oh brother...let's just agree to disagree...it's obvious what side of the issue you're on...

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Your account is a day old so I’m thinking you’re arguing in bad faith and are likely transphobic.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago
[-] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

More the reverse. If you say "Girls Only" and then exclude a girl, you've violated your own terms of service.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago

Why not just create a "trans" app and make your own people happy too?

[-] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago

Sounds like a good idea to me.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I think she will win this. They didn't require a genital photo so what's even their proof? Arbitrary requirement anyways. Rules like that only leave people out. I understand the want for a space like that though. I hope this woman finds a space where she can feel safe.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

I think she'll lose. Because regardless of the issue, a private company can terminate service at any time, for any reason.

It's also been upheld that a graphic artist who wants to design wedding websites can refuse to work with same-sex couples. What this means is, again, a company can pick and choose who to serve.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

a private company can terminate service at any time, for any reason

Not after they've accepted payment.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago

Why not create an app for trans women?

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

What’s the point of a woman’s only app (or any women’s only space) if they let anyone in simply based on them saying ‘I’m a woman’?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Because she is a woman. It's really that simple.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Wow an app based on gender descrimination is being sued for gender descrimination. I'm shocked

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

You know what this means though? It means that no one ever needed to push back against it at all just not engage in it themselves. Cuz they just eat each other in a vacuum. Without some enemy to band together against like the boogeyman of boogeymen whitey, their inner chaos is all they're left with with no enemy to project it on, so they eat each other and everything just crashes and falls apart. No one needed to do anything, not even complain, just look at it in amusement and take another sip of their coffee and go about their day thanking god that's not you.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Did you forget you're not in your sleazy little far-right bubble?

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

I'm not a right winger. I just see an ouroboros when I see it, it's the snake eating itself.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago
[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

people actually don't have a job

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

It sounds like you’re trying to argue nobody should fight discrimination while there are still ditches to dig and toilets to scrub.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

A waste of everyone's time. Sounds like entitlement.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

It's entitled to exclude.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago

Welcome to 2024, women can't have their own things anymore... (and I'm talking about REAL women, you know, the individuals have two X chromosomes).

this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38593 readers
2749 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS