this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
143 points (88.2% liked)

memes

10125 readers
3360 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 138 points 6 months ago (9 children)

If you really want the job, this is a bad idea. The form is there so that HR (who usually knows nothing about the technical details of the posted jobs) can match base requirements against what the hiring manager is looking for. If they get a match, they just forward the resume to the manager. Doing stuff like this on the form is likely going to result in them just moving on without looking at your application further. And it doesn't mean it's a bad place to work; the company and the manager might be great.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Pretty much.

Maybe I'm some rare unicorn. But I have NEVER successfully got a job filling out forms like this. It's a huge waste of my time.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I'm a hiring manager, and every single person hired at my company has to fill out a form like this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago

Places like this probably get 2000 submissions so they are indeed a waste of time.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You aren't. I was just hired for a great position by not filling out their form. Then they emailed me and asked if I wanted to finish. I said "I won't fill out something that is already on my resume". They had a couple of interviews and a substantial offer. I started last week.

It depends on the position. If it's entry level or some retail job, yes, fill it out. But management or some other position where it's highly specific, this is an absolute waste of my time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (19 children)

And they can't do that with a resume? Most things seem to be able to do that automatically these days (fill out forms with info from a resume that is); just the not damned employer.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (10 children)

Because filling out the data places it in identified fields that you can compile into a single table and sort. You’d have to examine each resume individually.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I mean, HR is being paid. They should be going through the resume and compiling the data themselves.

Instead they require the applicants to do it for free, despite the fact the applicants are probably having to do it dozens of times trying to apply for multiple jobs.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Also, it's hard for a computer to parse a resume, and most of this stuff runs through a computer before a human sees it, so filling a form makes sure the data is correct.

You also don't have to worry about corrupted or unsupported files.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (6 children)

You're telling me that computers are sophisticated enough to drive cars and create new antibiotics but resumes are just too much? Nah.

If that's the case then don't ask for a resume and only have the form to input job history that can be easily handed over to a manager using a printable template.

It's lazy on HR's part and on the HR software they use.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago

Have you ever seen a standard resume?

They don't exist. Resumes are totally different for every person. Different document format, different layout.

The forms are for filtering. Ones that pass filtering, then the resumes will actually be read.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 101 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Would actually love to do that. I just have an extreme aversion to knowingly shooting myself in the foot

[–] [email protected] 35 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Me too. The only jobs I apply to are ones I really want (obviously), so doing this just hurts my chances of getting them.

But I absolutely hate this bullshit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 6 months ago (16 children)

As a hiring manager, I am absolutely floored how many people do not actually have this information on their resumes. So while most people would assume a lot of redundancies between the form and a resume, I can assure you that many people do not have this information readily available on their resumes.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 6 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 months ago

I don't have it on mine. I finished high school (college) 20 years ago. There are way more relevant things to put in my resume than that.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago (8 children)

Why do you even need to know my high-school?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Sorry to say but you hiring managers don’t know jack shit about hiring people. You have zero clue as to what qualifies an employee. Always asking the wrong questions.

The reason why corporations have a hard time finding talent isn’t because a lack of talent. It’s because the hiring process is a joke. But then you’ll complain that no one wants to work anymore.

The amount of top talent you toss into the bin because you don’t know what questions to is staggering.

Truly abysmal.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago

then why ask for both things? just have a checkbox to indicate that the information is in the resumé, and if it isn't then obviously they shouldn't be hired since they either can't read or don't give a shit.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago

Why do you need to know where I went to school if I have years of job experience showing that I can do the job? Education seems only to matter if someone is newly graduated and without real-world experience. And high school? Wtf?!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Why do you need to build a system to capture this information from people that can't read rather than just rejecting those applications?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago

Then why do you need the resume if you just ask for it all again

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 6 months ago

We all, deep down, understand the exploitative of the employer/employee relationship. They are setting the tone for the rest of your life doing bullshit work that doesn't matter at all.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If you ever get through to a person high enough to answer your question of: "why did you ask for my resume?"

...the honest answer is:

"There are two things that look at you, the candidate. For cost cutting reasons, we put your answers you fill in all these blanks into a computer which eliminates you if you don't match our basic criteria. We save money by never actually even knowing your name. If you pass the computer filter, your resume is needed because actual humans look at it. So thats why we ask for both."

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Unfortunately this computer filtering step tends to be highly inaccurate and game-able, but I’m not sure what to propose instead.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Unfortunately this computer filtering step tends to be highly inaccurate and game-able, but I’m not sure what to propose instead.

Game-able, as in, entering specific answers (even if they are inaccurate) gets you through the computer and put in front of a human? Working as intended.

Ever since the social contract was broken with employers where they'd give you a job for decades if you stayed there, there's been an ongoing "arms race" of how job applicants can get noticed, and how employers can get usable candidates out of the massive tidal waves of applicants they get. The first step computer filter doesn't have to be perfect, if it even filters out 80% of the candidate that don't meet basic criteria, leaving only 20% for humans to review that is massively better (to employers) than requiring humans to look at all 100% of applicants.

So yes, its game-able to get through the computer filter, but if you still don't match the basic criteria, you'll be eliminated by the human reviewers anyway. The difference is only very small number of candidates will figure out the game-able answers to get through even if they aren't supposed to. This is...until the next round of the arms race where nearly all candidates are getting through. That hasn't happened yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago (2 children)

There's actually an easy technical fix for this. All we would need is a common format for resumes that is machine readable, e.g. an XML schema that defines what fields should be in there. Then you just need a simple tool with a nice UI for inputting the info. So what are the chances of this happening? That's right, exactly zero.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I recently endured a job search. Applied to over 400 positions on Indeed alone. I stopped filling out the forms. Probably lost out on some job opportunities, but having to fill this shit out 30 times a day is not worth the effort.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Once when I was in High School, there was a test that had a fat block of instructions at the top. But buried in those instructions it said "You don't need to write any answers, just write your name and hand the instructor the test, and you will receive 100% credit." It was more a test to see if people would read and follow instructions than it was for knowledge. Needless to say, many people did not get 100% credit.

I can only guess that job applications are like that test in this regard.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago (2 children)

My version was the last question of the test. She wanted us to read an entire test and then start answering after we finished reading it.

Lady, was I supposed to read an entire section of the SAT before taking it? That sounds so nutty.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

I had something like that in military school except it was group graded...and we couldn't talk, so once myself and like 5 others saw the instructions, we watched the others 25 finish the test. We got lit up for the worst class out of 5 in the current year.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago

I'm so glad I was able to establish a career and become well known in an industry before applying for positions was so demoralising and exhausting. I worry about what things will be like in another few years when my children enter the job market.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Recruiters consistently use bad practices like this and use AI to search for keywords.

Then they get upset when candidates use AI to apply for jobs.

Rules for thee, but not for me!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

There’s a technical reason they do this that has been pointed out elsewhere but it has the added benefit of filtering out people who believe they are above the process. Most jobs have processes (safety processes, legal processes, etc.). You can avoid people who aren’t ready to accept they may be exceptional, but are applying for a position that does not require them to be.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago (3 children)

That's a very pro-company spin on it. But on the other hand it definitely filters for people who don't mind being downright humiliated by a job that doesn't respect their time or puts effort into finding employees. This pattern of reentering your resume data is pretty brand new, and justifying it from the companies side is pretty post-hoc when it's really just offloading labor the company used to do to the unpaid job applicant who has to do this 20 times in a row.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago

Yes, they’re basically testing your ability or willingness to do meaningless tasks when they’re assigned to you because let’s face it, most jobs these days are 90% meaningless work.

I used to think that’s a bad thing because just like most people here, I wanted to be exceptional but perhaps it’s not the worst thing in the world to get paid for doing something so simple you could do it in your sleep, so you can save your mental energy for doing more important things in your free time.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This may be the case at some companies, but I think for the most part this is giving companies too much credit. Having people fill in these details in this form directly feeds into a spreadsheet, meaning the staff responsible for onboarding don't have to go looking for the information on the resume

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago

I have filled out these forms, and I have abandoned applications.

If I am being paid to follow process, that's one thing. If I'm being forced to jump through hoops for free on my own time, before I'm even particularly interested in your company, that's a completely different thing.

Same with coding applications. Maybe I will, maybe I won't, really just depends on if I'm bored or not. But as a requirement before the application is even looked at, it's fucking stupid.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

“nO oNe WaNtS tO WoRk AnYmOrE!!”

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

This is one of the rare spaces where AI could be genuinely useful if it can accurately pull this data out of mass uploaded resumes.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It's already being used, and already screens out people with the same biases you could expect (name sounds foreign, name is female, etc.).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›