404
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 31 points 3 weeks ago

I mean, in the US governments eyes, that's already what they're doing...

[-] [email protected] 25 points 3 weeks ago

Canada really should step in. Shouldnt be allowing this behavior so close to their border.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

Annex the USA you say?

Reverse-Fallout-plot.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

It will always be hilarious that Emil decided to "reveal" that Nate was one of the fascist troops on the ground executing unarmed Canadian rebels we see in Fallout 1's opening scene

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Not just one of the troops, he was the one laughing his ass off lol

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

(SARCASTIC)

"Woulda been easier if he just handed over the maple syrup, amirite Jim?" laugh track

[-] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

I want to live in the Canada-annexes-US timeline

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

After 20 years in Canada I can tell you the shit I dislike the most was imported from the USA... The shit I like the most came from Europe

[-] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago

If the USA invaded the USA they'd probably just lose again. I'm not sure that's even technically possible but their past track record shows it's inevitable 😂

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

Technically, they already did that once, back in 1861...

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Well the war in the USA would be so unpopular with the USA they'd be pressured to withdraw from the USA...but they'd stick around for another decade because defense contractors' stonks were still doing great.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago
[-] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yes the USA loots its own citizens as a matter of constant policy. Even though USA produces so much oil it would have no problem looting a few buckets if the rich who own the politicians would benefit from it. Perhaps an example is in order.

A certain ice cream plant produces ice cream in upstate New York.

The ice cream is shipped to Phoenix, Arizona. They load 44,000 lbs. of the ice cream on a freezer truck. The freezer truck drives 2,200 miles from Jamestown, NY to Phoenix, AZ and delivers the ice cream, which is then distributed to supermarkets in the Phoenix area.

The same freezer truck then drives about 5 miles across Phoenix, to an ice cream plant. The ice cream plant loads the truck with 44,000 lbs. of ice cream. Then the semi hauls the ice cream 2150 miles to Erie, PA, just 50 miles away from Jamestown, NY, where it started.

So over 4000 miles worth of diesel fuel was burned, to move ice cream 50 miles en toto.

Why?

Because the ultra rich aristocrats own all the companies. They own the ice cream plants, and they own the trucking company, and they own the oil company that produces the diesel to run the truck and refrigerated trailer.

Since they are all in cahoots, they rig the prices of everything. They also rig the tax rates since they own the politicians, in such a way that the tax system crushes the smaller competitors and keeps them in control of markets and production. This is the real purpose of the progressive income tax on wages and small businesses, to crush them and funnel their capital into the hands of the fat cats on Wall Street and the corporate sector. Such taxes have virtually no effect on these giant conglomerates, who pass the cost of tax off onto the investor, taxpayer, and small businesses that can manage to hang on in such a market.

And this is why USA would invade another country over oil or any other resource. To crush and control competition so that prices for everything may be kept artificially inflated for maximum profit, and so that the means of production remains under their control.

In order to stay on top, they move endless hordes of trucks 4000+ miles in order to have a net movement of ice cream 50 miles. This only makes economic sense when the scheme is devised to cut out all potential non-aristocratic competition.

This is what socialism is really about. And this is why the rich fund socialist revolution at every turn. And this is why the rich pay their parrots to squawk about capitalism, when we don't even have capitalism. We have a centrally-managed, socialist economy--capitalism for the poor, who have no capital, and socialism for the rich, who have all the capital.

Thus the capital of the poor continues to flow one direction, to the rich, and if the rich get into trouble, the government takes more capital from the poor to bail out the rich. That is socialism, not capitalism.

Real capitalism doesn't have bailouts and central management and endless regulatory red tape that favors the rich corporate bosses. Real capitialism is everyone fighting like cats and dogs to provide the best product at the lowest prices, which has not been happening in America since the days before Rockefeller and Standard Oil. So when political weenies gripe about 'capitalism' they don't realize what they are saying, because we live under a hardline socialist regime in the USA. People are decieved by word games into not even understanding their own reality.

So when another country's resource exports would threaten the aristocracy's control of prices and supply in the international market, the US regime sends them democracy bombs.

@[email protected]

@[email protected]

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

we live under a hardline socialist regime in the USA. People are decieved by word games into not even understanding their own reality.

Incredible. The pure concentrate of no self-awareness, distilled into two sentences.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This is what socialism is really about. And this is why the rich fund socialist revolution at every turn. And this is why the rich pay their parrots to squawk about capitalism, when we don’t even have capitalism. We have a centrally-managed, socialist economy–capitalism for the poor, who have no capital, and socialism for the rich, who have all the capital.

the capital of the poor

the government takes more capital from the poor to bail out the rich. That is socialism, not capitalism.

Real capitalism doesn’t have bailouts and central management and endless regulatory red tape that favors the rich corporate bosses. Real capitialism is everyone fighting like cats and dogs to provide the best product at the lowest prices

we live under a hardline socialist regime in the USA

I won't even ask "are you unwell" because the answer is obvious

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Real capitalism doesn’t have bailouts and central management and endless regulatory red tape that favors the rich corporate bosses.

That’s still just capitalism. The state has been captured by the bourgeoisie since its birth in the 1776 bourgeois revolution. The Founding Fathers formed a bourgeois democracy, otherwise known as a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie. The state has never represented the proletariat, and it was never supposed to.

Real capitialism is everyone fighting like cats and dogs to provide the best product at the lowest prices, which has not been happening in America since the days before Rockefeller and Standard Oil.

Firstly that is also just capitalism, and secondly, by the time Rockefeller became a robber baron it was already no longer that type of capitalism, but monopoly capitalism, which we still have today. This type of capitalism had been predicted by Marx and described in great detail by Lenin in Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism.

we live under a hardline socialist regime in the USA

So you don’t have even a basic understanding of capitalism or of socialism. Even Wikipedia isn’t this wrong.

Thus the capital of the poor continues to flow one direction, to the rich, and if the rich get into trouble, the government takes more capital from the poor to bail out the rich. That is socialism, not capitalism.

As long as the state serves the bourgeoisie, it is a capitalist state. A socialist state is when the state serves the proletariat. Communism is when it is a classless society. And sovereign fiat money doesn’t work that way. The government doesn’t get its money from the poor or from anyone else: it just creates it out of thin air. Why The Government Has Infinite Money

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago

Only so it could destroy all your critical infrastructure and then charge you to rebuild it all using US contractors.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

The USA doesn’t do what the USA does for the USA, the USA does what the USA does because the USA is the USA.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

Pacience. History always repeats itself, if you don't learn from it, and imperialism always has its days numbered.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

America! Fuck yeah.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
404 points (94.9% liked)

Memes

43407 readers
2289 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS