581
its true tho (lemmy.today)
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 42 points 3 weeks ago
[-] [email protected] 70 points 3 weeks ago
[-] [email protected] 50 points 3 weeks ago

Google having their own proprietary crap embedded in their version doesnt make AOSP not FOSS.

Thats the entirety of the basis for things like GrapheneOS, despite Google gobbling it up.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 3 weeks ago

Not technically no, though neither does it fully embrace the spirit of FOSS either. Anyway I was explaining the appearance of those two being at odds with one another in the meme. Anyone who does not enjoy meme content can simply block this community and move on with the serious side of life.:-)

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Correct me if I'm wrong but does FOSS not simply mean the following?

software that is available under a license that grants the right to use, modify, and distribute the software, modified or not, to everyone free of charge

source: Wikipedia

From my understanding AOSP's license grants all those rights. I think what you might be opposed to is that it isn't developed out in the open, which is a fair criticism.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Well, they wrote the "spirit of FOSS" and you pulled out a completely sterile definition, which has no spirit at all.

At the very least, even with that sterile definition, embracing the spirit would mean making all the software you're distributing FOSS. Instead, Google has been doing all kinds of bundle deals and whatnot to ensure that most distributions of their FOSS software come with their proprietary parts.

However, going further in embracing the spirit, particularly the "free software" part of FOSS is idealistic. It doesn't just fulfill that definition to fulfill that definition. Rather, it sees that definition as the baseline, to help ensure that the freedom of users is respected.

AOSP, despite being under an appropriate license, does not respect that freedom.
For example, many users would want their keyboard app (which has access to their typed passwords) to not have internet access. AOSP has a myriad of permissions, but not for internet access, since Google wants their ads to be displayed.

In theory, the license ensures that AOSP can be forked, and Custom ROMs do soft-fork it (i.e. make slight amendments to what Google puts out), but due to how much development Google puts into Android rather than there being a development community, it's effectively not viable for anyone to truly hard-fork AOSP (i.e. take it into a new direction, independent from Google).

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 20 points 3 weeks ago

yeah just like Chromium technically speaking

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Android is FOSS, but is your phone FOSS?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

i use a foss rom, so its software is.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 3 weeks ago

Do android stans exist? Had always thought android was the lesser of two evils for most people

[-] [email protected] 30 points 3 weeks ago

its most definitely the lesser, but there are still many people who would suck off Samsung and Google if they had the opportunity to.

trust me I've met them

[-] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

Just as some Linux enthusiasts would from Mr. Torvalds.

It's like with every other fandom: There are haters, normal folks, lovers and the pesky hyper-fan.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

What if I just like to suck.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

The good thing is: You (still) have free will.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Foss ftw baby

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 28 points 3 weeks ago
[-] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

Get a haircut, hippie.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 25 points 3 weeks ago

GrapheneOS FTW

[-] [email protected] 25 points 3 weeks ago

If I need to choose, I'll go with Android but to be quite frank, I would really prefer to have a "real" computer operating system on those devices. For 10+ years I've been waiting for a device that I can put in my pocket, use it on the go, with a data connection, and have the possibility to dock it and continue using it as a full fledged computer, with Linux if possible.

I know some high end Android devices can be "docked" and connected to a monitor, but they are far too expensive and/or too rare. Also, you still have to use apps instead of proper computer software. I don't like the "everything is an app" model, where they all have to have ads and/or paid versions. Android and "mobile" operating systems are a pain to use. I want to have control over my device.

And I also know there are some devices that can to this, but with the level of technology that we have, a device like this should be easy to find. Yet, it's all niche stuff that isn't really polished nor working really well. It's all damn phones and tablets with "mobile" operating systems that locks users. I wonder if phone/tablet manufacturers keep it that way because there's no demand for this, or if they simply want to continue the milking of the mobile users.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This! Mobile operating systems are trash, and there's no good reason for it. I always see people parroting the same nonsense, "you have the power of a super computer in your pocket". Okay, then why can't I use it like a supercomputer? It's all crippled toy versions of the desktop applications, social media garbage, or microtransaction stuffed toilet games.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Absolutely this. I, too, go for android (pixel even, sigh) but would prefer a real os. android was aweful when it came out, grew much better, then declined again. And with each update they kill so many apps due to "security"-changes.

And what's worst of all, is the constant struggle to actually own your own device (=root). Noone would ever have bought a pc with no admin-pwd where you can only "refresh" your current windows-version and nothing more. You can't buy anything else than pixels (and even with those you need at least minimum tech-knowledge and are dependent on the continuing development of ONE app). Having any other brand makes it near impossible without luck, time and frustration-tolerance.

The coming generations will just pay 1000 for a phone they are allowed to use, not own, and think that is how it is and ever has been.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago

android's at least open source

[-] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago

The base of it is, but you're not buying a phone with a fully open source Android OS on it

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago

Graphene OS changed my life, seriously. Completely changed my relationship to my phone and made it possible to focus again. Go open source

[-] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

What specific features did you notice the most? (I'm assuming switching from Android?) 90% of my phone usage is through a browser, so I could probably install Graphene pretty easily.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

#1 through #69: no push notifications, no feeds on my home screen, nothing I don't explicitly turn on and configure. No bloat whatsoever, the phone comes practically empty. I got this at the beginning of 2022, before then I kept finding myself reading articles about Johnny Depp and Amber Heard. Like I could not give less of a fuck about them, that story, whatever. I don't know who she is, and I don't particularly like JD movies except maybe Dead Man from the 90s, he probably beat the shit out of her idk. But for some reason I kept finding myself reading these articles on my phone absentmindedly. That kind of shit ended immediately.

Downsides? Not everything works, because there's no google play, and I couldn't get it even if I wanted it. I can use most google services on the browser, but for maps I have to use Osmand, which works but doesn't give me the fastest way to a place, and its kind of a trick to find a specific house or business without looking it up on a computer first and locating the nearest cross street. Schools, hospitals it has saved no problem, but not the optimal routes ore even anything relatively close. Great for my city where I can get myself 98% the way there already knowing the fastest ways around. Out of town we usually use my wife's navigation.

Those drawbacks are a little annoying but I will never go back to android, and I would never use apple in the first place. I love my phone, it feels like its mine in a way no phone ever has.

Hope this helps, ask if you have other questions

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Interesting. Not having a good maps / navigation app might be a bit of a dealbreaker for me, since that's pretty much the last 10% of what I use my phone for. Degoogling myself there will require some effort....

As for push notifications and feeds, I don't really have a problem with that on my current phone with base android. I'm pretty aggressive about blocking random notifications or uninstalling apps entirely if they show me push notifications ads or "use me" reminders. And my home screen is just a clock and calendar.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago

"Google is insidious. They're really an advertising data-collection company, but people think they're a tech service company. Their whole strategy is to provide stuff like Chrome for free so that lots of people use it and it becomes a de facto standard, and then they flip a switch and quietly mine all of that data."

15 minutes later...

"Anyway, I prefer Android cuz it's FOSS."

[-] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago

People who prefer android because it's open source usually use open source android because that's what they want.

That being said, proprietary blobs and black boxes are a pox on basically every usable device these days. I hate it.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Apple and Google are both part of the NSA's Prism data collection program.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I honestly haven’t seen an “Apple fanboy” IRL in like 10 years lol I feel like that romantic image ended some form ago.

Still, great meme and very true lol

[-] [email protected] 37 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

You still get a lot of the old 'android is for poor people' narrative. Age and sub-culture also play a part.

Drake, one of the most commercially successful musicians in the past 15 years, released a song where he says he wouldn't answer a call from a woman because she was calling him from an android.

That song came out just 6 months ago (Oct 2023) and was number one on the charts. A ton of young people will have heard that and been influenced on some level by it, so the Apple fanboy/android hater thing probably won't be going away any time soon

[-] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago

That's also Drake and nobody respects him.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

I want this to be true lol

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

I get that but there’s a bit of a difference in status symbols/conspicuous consumption and “Apple fanboy” culture IMO. But again, I get what you mean.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago

damn I wish I lived where you lived

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

I just had a colleague mock me (good naturedly) the other day for having an android phone. I just laughed and said, I'm no fan of Google but at least I can install what I want on here. That was the end of it, haha.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

Damn, in my school class... I thought we are all old enough but my class also consists of Narcisstic and Egocentric people.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I’ve written this a couple of times now, so this is gonna be the last one: it’s not about the wealth it displays, the conspicuous consumption.

Consider the term “Nintendo fanboy.” Do they buy it because of the image? To impress everybody that they own Nintendo products? No, they defend Nintendo and are staunch advocates of the company and their games, unwilling to be critical or consider where other companies/products might be better. They’re basically zealots for a product. Cost and what it says about your status are not top of mind.

There are people who buy Apple products for the social image, to flaunt wealth. That is not the same as the fanboy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

Use what you like. Just like Windows, macOS and Linux for the vast majority of people, all these OSes are, are platforms to display apps and webpages. They all have sanded off most of the rough edges meaning that unless you have specific niche needs/wants, you'll just use what is familar and be happy.

Life is too short to have deep feelings about an OS.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

I had a lot of hope for Android in the early days before Google dropped the n't from their "Don't be evil" corporate slogan.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They pit us against each other in this arbitrary culture-war...the proprietary versus the open standards. And it's so wildly anti-consumer but we fall for it, year after year. Maybe one day Apple users will realize how anti-consumer it is, but I doubt it, they love the exclusivity of being half of the people with a smartpbone.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

This is the reason you shouldn’t choose a chat platform that requires the using the mobile OS duopoly—get your friends off of LINE, WhatsApp, & Signal.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago

while I agree, signal is also on Linux and is a more polished alternative

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

But it does require a cell phone number to get started, meaning your signal account is tied to your identity via your phone carrier

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Got this update message in signal earlier this week. Nice to see them moving in the right direction, but I guess the initial signup still requires a phone number.

"Your phone number will no longer be visible to anyone on the latest version of Signal unless they have it saved in their phone's contacts. You can change this in Settings.

A new privacy setting lets you control who can find you by your phone number on Signal.

You can now set and share an optional username to let people chat with you without giving them your phone number. "

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

There are many services that will give you a temp number to sign up with for these services. I have many verified discord accounts, none of which are my actual phone number.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

Lineage OS fan here. I'm in the clear

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Lol I can't understand how you get so many upvotes but when I make a meme everybody's like "what's a stan???" Linux users are some of the most antisocial people on the planet.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
581 points (95.5% liked)

Memes

43407 readers
2289 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS