this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
570 points (99.7% liked)

Science Memes

10970 readers
2254 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 83 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

You cannot launch rockets "directly at the sun". We're orbiting the sun. All the rockets we launch are orbiting the sun by default. The way you hit the sun is by slowing down the rocket from the Earth's starting orbital velocity so that it can fall into the sun. You actually have to point the rocket away from the orbital vector of the Earth which would be perpendicular to the sun and fire the rocket to slow it down.

Side note and fun fact, it takes less energy to speed up a rocket from Earth's orbital velocity to escape the entire solar system than it takes slow it down to reach the sun.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 7 months ago (1 children)

FALSE.
You absolutely can launch rockets "directly at the sun".
.. you're just not likely to hit it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Not without an inappropriate amount of delta v, it takes effort to hit the sun from the earth. Iirc it’s less energy to yeet yourself out of the solar system from earth than to hit the sun. Direct be even crazier amounts of energy to cancel out our orbital velocity. Iirc it would be easier to do a Jupiter transfer to save on delta v, going direct though is clown town energy waste unless you have some dying need to get there faster for some reason. But you’ll pay for it, a lot, least until we get warp drives or something neato exotic. https://issfd.org/ISSFD_2014/ISSFD24_Paper_S6-5_jehn.pdf If you’re willing to trade time there are less costly ways to “hit” a 700 000 km radius target energy wise.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It is actually more energy efficient to fly away from the Sun first, since the required orbital velocity you need to cancel out goes down as you get further. So launching missiles towards the sun from Pluto would be way easier, in terms of acceleration needed

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That's not true either, it takes way more energy to drop your orbit the further out you are, regardless of eccentricity. It's easier to curcularize near apoapsis, easier to change apoapsis and orbital planes at periapsis. The trick, however, is that bonus from periapsis works on being at any periapsis (ie, a near miss of a planet), just need the speed boost from being nearest the gravity well. That's what gravitational slingshots are. I think a sun trajectory uses Jupiter a few times for maneuvers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Well if we're discussing semantics you could say you're targeting it directly at the sun by using a trajectory that doesn't aim to slingshot or orbit around other planetary bodies first

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

If only there was a word that meant we used the path of least resistance.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Such a delightful display of intersectional nerdery.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Space nerds, history nerds, and SG1 nerds

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Carter: Oh boy, here I go blowing up suns again!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

You cause 1 star to supernova and poison another and all of the sudden you've got a reputation for destroying solar systems.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

When you took an elective and it almost made you change majors

[–] [email protected] 47 points 7 months ago (3 children)

The sun is basically impervious, so it's a good thing they are just aiming at the sun and not at Apollo or the line he uses to pull the sun across the sky.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The sun is basically impervious

Getting some real "it's unsinkable" vibes here, buddy. Don't go selling tickets to an iceberg you can't something something.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The suns impervious? That's quitter talk. I'm going to kick that shit's ass

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

That doesn't sound right, but I don't know enough about stars to dispute it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We do a little bit of trolling

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yet another piece of evidence that the SGC is still around

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Do they mean they shot them at the moon, or that they were doing a sun dive?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Neither. They were sounding rockets to measure atmospheric changes from the moon's shadow.