this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
153 points (98.1% liked)

Interesting Global News

2808 readers
1125 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

An Australian museum excluded men from an exhibit to highlight misogyny. A man sued for access and won.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/mkwF8

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 50 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Protesting misogyny through misandry - what a fabulous idea! Next, how about a protest against childhood obesity by starving a couple of kids to death?

Doing a shitty thing to protest a different shitty thing only multiplies the amount of shit instead of reducing it...

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 8 months ago (5 children)

I'm not really a fan of the whole "we'll be intolerant so you know what it feels like" but it's also the only way I can really know what it feels like as a white man from a middle class family. I'm on the fence on this one.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They should just make it a small art exhibit out front, then 2 bathrooms, the mens is normal, with some basic art, but the women's bathroom has a bar and cocktail lounge and the extra amenities. Then the business wouldn't be excluding men, it would just be providing them a different experience in the bathroom which I feel like they'd have a much better time defending in court. But it also seems like this whole thing was done as a form of activism and it looks like one of the intents is for this business to close down so they can be martyrs.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You don't need to know what it feels like. Trying to fight intolerance with intolerance isn't successful.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

You don’t need to know what it feels like.

no, but it can help

Trying to fight intolerance with intolerance isn’t successful.

blanket statements like this are rarely helpful or true

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I think downvoters have forgotten the paradox of tolerance. That said, intolerance should be applied at the individual level (ie don't tolerate a nazi because they are a nazi), not by group (like the scenario this thread is about did).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago

The more interesting thing to me is... They were modeling a thing that was popular in the 60s, according to the article. It's an art display to protest something from 60+ years ago. A lot of the people who would go to such an exhibit weren't alive, and certainly weren't adults at the time.

There are surely problems that women face today but I don't see how this helps shine any light on that or does anything at all for it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago

I think it's fine as a limited art piece, but sexism is sexism and should not be perpetrated against any gender in a serious way.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (39 children)

That's easy.
For starters: Go to China. Go to the middle east. Go to Zimbabwe. Go to the wrong parts of Brazil or South Africa.

Hell, go to Northern Ireland.

It's an idiotic thing to state that white people are not and have never been oppressed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Plenty of down-votes but strangely no responses.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I mean, overwhelmingly people aren't racially discriminated against for being white so I'm not sure what it is you're trying to back up.

Sure it happens. The one that's closest to home for me in that list is Northern Ireland. White Catholics here were abused, but it was by white people so nothing to do with the colour of their skin. Honestly such a terrible example with absolutely no understanding for historical context.

I've spent non-trivial time in the Middle East. Sure I'm not at the same social class as Arabs there but I was sure fucking glad I wasn't brown.

China, wot? Yeah people stare at me but nobody was nasty. If anything I was a novelty.

White people in South Africa were gonna get what they were gonna get in a post apartheid world where they pillaged and oppressed until quite recently. That doesn't make it right but it makes it inevitable.

They're all very poorly thought out, edge case examples with the exception of Zimbabwe unless I'm missing others that I'm not aware of.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

The velvet-clad lounge - which contains some of the museum's most-acclaimed works, from Picasso to Sidney Nolan - has been open since 2020.

If the artist had opened an exhibit of her own work only to women, I could defend that as artistic expression. However, this is simply a museum being sexist and then saying "It's just art bro!"

With that said, apparently the museum is privately funded. I tend to think that this ought to mean it can be sexist if that's what the people running it want (as a matter of principle, not as a matter of Australian law).

[–] [email protected] 64 points 8 months ago (24 children)

I tend to think that this ought to mean it can be sexist if that’s what the people running it want

IDK, I'd see issues with a cafe saying 'No colored people allowed'.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I read in another thread that the women-only rule was an art installation and they were happy when the guy sued, because it created the publicity they were looking for.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (6 children)

The problem with letting private businesses discriminate is that it often leads to total discrimination. A single racist towing company would be a huge problem. A racist grocery store could be the only one in town. Sure you might not go to a racist bar, but what if the fire or police chief frequents that place?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

It's the privately funding thing, I'm sure Australia has men's clubs like the Eagles, Masonic, etc. My guess is that if they offered tickets to purchase, there would be the discrimination? You can't sell something and not offer it to everyone. OTOH, that doesn't make sense because we have timed tickets and members only tickets here in the US, do they have something like that in Australia?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'd argue that the plaintiff and the court case are all part of the exhibit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Idk how I feel about this. I will say however, any time I've ever seen feminist principles be applied exclusionary, it's always additionally accompanied by TERF shit. It's a very quick pipeline from "no boys allowed" to "no trans allowed". The lines dividing can be so blurry... I don't think it's a good mindset.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

I'll bring this up only once, because not only do I not want to deal with backlash, I also dont want to stand in the way of progress or hurt anyone who is trans, but: Notice how society mostly freaks out about Trans Women, and Trans Men are an afterthought in that outrage. Its because Misandry is playing a not insignificant part in this. A key thing about transphobes is they arent seeing Trans Women as Women, and its their ideas on how MEN are that are informing their vitrol. So you are seeing those two go hand in hand for a reason

Edit: Fuck it, I need to clarify: Trans Women are WOMEN, Trans Men are MEN

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

Yup, trans men are "poor deluded women and victims of the patriarchy" and trans women are "predators trying to invade women's spaces". And that's if trans men are even thought of at all.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Yeah that was the allusion I was leaning towards

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 8 months ago

Sometimes I believe women’s only spaces need to exist for some instances of women who experienced trauma to feel safe and be able to start their healing without their nervous systems taking over.

However, this doesn’t sound like that. This sounds like exclusion.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

I'm gonna start a "Dogs Only" exhibit and it's just a bunch of delicious hotdogs hanging from easily-accessible strings and shit.

Don't worry, I've got one for cats too. Same thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Under liberalism, the goal of the oppressed is to become the oppressor.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›