this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
95 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15681 readers
225 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this.

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

your weekly dose of hankschannel libshit. the description is pure "the president couldn't possibly have lied or made a mistake" copium

HOW IS HIS TAKEAWAY FROM ALL THIS THAT TWITTER IS BAD BUT BIDEN IS GOOD

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 42 points 7 months ago

Biden is doing his best which is the problem

[–] [email protected] 41 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Good lord I fucking hate this cracker and his dipshit brother

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I liked him in Mentopolis as The Fix. That is more or less all I know of him. Was he one of the vlogbrothers in days yore?

[–] [email protected] 39 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

to be clear, twitter is bad, but not because it tells people when biden is lying without giving Hank enough Details and Context. I mean ffs this all happened ages ago and I could have told you exactly what he spent the whole video researching and whinging about how complicated it was. It's not that complicated.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 7 months ago (4 children)

hahahaha its the original soyjak who "fucking loves science"!!!

I remember he recently shat out a video about how the solution to homelessness is to build more houses because: "akkording to muh soyience, supply must be down because demand and price lines go up!"

[–] [email protected] 31 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Built by who? Owned by who? What's stoping those homes from immediatly being bought up by investment capital and being rented out at the "fair market rate"?

Fucks sake I'm sick of the "I don't understand why they don't just..." solutions

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Fucks sake I'm sick of the "I don't understand why they don't just..." solutions

I don't understand why we don't just abolish the landlord class landlord-spotted

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

They dont have solutions for housing or homelessness without abandoning their politics. They get very mad when you point out their Build More Housing No Matter What Kind is just trickle down economics from the 80s applied to an inelastic good.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

rented out at the "fair market rate" *to aquaman FTFY

Fucks sake I'm sick of the "I don't understand why they don't just..." solutions

Liberals, naiive people who think they know the "cold hard truth about the reality(TM)".

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (7 children)

I remember he recently shat out a video about how the solution to homelessness is to build more houses because

Hot take, I agree with the Libs on this one, we should be building more housing. The country is increasingly urbanizing, which should be a good thing, but local petite bourg real estate owners want to restrict supply to make their assets more valuable. Hence the affordability crisis. Throwing up more high rises in Cali would do a lot to help lower housing costs and reduce homelessness.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't agree with libs on this one. More housing doesn't directly relate to more affordable housing. If it was affordable high rises, sure. But the housing we're building is "market rates" and higher and that just doesn't push down prices, it drags prices up.

Housing is an inelastic good and landlords will charge whatever they "can" which is based off other available houses.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I should have prefaced, as a socialist I think we should build more PUBLIC housing. That would address the problem more quickly and directly.

However...

landlords will charge whatever they "can" which is based off other available houses.

Part of the reason they can charge so much is they don't have much competition, any open space is going to have a lot of people competing for it so you can Jack up prices, somebody will probably be able to pay. If there was more selection people could go for cheaper options and landlords wouldn't be able to ask exorbitant prices for subpar properties.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If it reaches the scale of Red Vienna then it definitely starts to have an effect

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Yeah part of the reason the Karl Marx Hof worked is because private landlords now had to compete with this really nice, affordable, housing bloc. You can't charge exorbitant rents if your tenants have a decent affordable option on the plate.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

That is until nobody can afford to pay, then all that land is overvalued and the bubble gets scary again

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

like making more housing is kinda of the solution, the problem is that you don't need to build houses as much as should retrofit existing buildings that are empty in dense urbans spaces into housing, as they would have access to much better infrastructure and would be cheaper and less damaging to de enviroment as building materials have such a fucked up carbon footprint due to their production, like i am from brazil and i think the best thing lula did was his proposal to use old federal buildings that have lost their use into housing (for example, a bunch of stuff in rio that is on the most valued land with a bunch of transportation and infrastructure already built in that lost their function when the capital moved to Brasilia) which is incredibly better than the other program that we already had from his first term that builds houses because those tend to be so far away from where people actually live on the areas that have the least job oportunities

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (4 children)

There's plenty of houses already. building houses doesn't work if the new house immediatly gets bought by an investment firm that rents it out for 1.5x the areas median income.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Throwing up more high rises in Cali would do a lot to help lower housing costs and reduce homelessness.

Is there any example of this occurring, because these high rises in California are all exclusively going for 4-5k a month for a 1 bedroom, which im not sure is very helpful for a population thay struggles to pay any rent

The libs are not right because they do not agree with you on public housing, its all mArKeT bAsEd SoLuTiOns.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

tbf there are localized supply issues. But there's also a "rich fucks have lost their basic humanity and ability to live in a society" problem that requires fixing before any serious solutions can really be entertained :gui:

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

housing first does not mean we must jerk off to trickle down economics. also its projected half of all homes will be owned by corporations in 2030

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

half of all homes will be owned by corporations in 2030

We need him back mao-aggro-shining

[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago

Hank Green is just that guy from Mentopolis. You can’t convince me he’s a Youtuber.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago

Thesis: Biden is doing his best.

Antithesis: Biden is ethnically cleansing Palestinians.

Synthesis: Biden is doing his best ethnically cleansing Palestinians.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago

pokemon fascist red and lib green

[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I don't trust anyone who writes YA books for a few reasons.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

weird take

I don’t trust Hank green, but it’s because he’s a lib

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Are there any YA authors who aren't either Libs or weirdo midwest conservatives?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago

Ursula K Le Guin wrote Earthsea and has very cool politics.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

KA Applegate is fine I think?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Okay forgot her, and Animorphs is good

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Probably, yeah. There are a ton of different YA authors out there. Off the top of my head, the book Feed by M.T. Anderson is a great depiction of a techno-capitalist dystopia. In the book,

spoilera girl with an aftermarket brain chip is denied healthcare because her consumer spending patterns make her an unprofitable target for advertisers.

I’ve seen YA authors get derided a few times on this site (once, it was aimed at male YA authors in particular), and it comes across as reactionary to me. I just don’t understand.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Fair enough, it's just every well known YA author I can think of off the top of my head has shit politics. Also most examples of YA I know of have shit politics story wise too. Also I've found the whole existence of the genre kinda weird, what specifically about them makes them for "young adults"? People in that age range are generally mature enough they could just be reading regular literature, outside of them having younger protagonists (which there is plenty of non-YA literature with younger protags) idk what is specifically is "YA" about them besides maybe having a bit easier to digest prose?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

young adult is misleading cause it sounds like it could apply to teens (who should probably be graduating to regualr 'adult' lit) but i think its reasonable for there to be something between learning-to-read baby prose and full hog literature

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

every well known YA author I can think of off the top of my head has shit politics. Also most examples of YA I know of have shit politics story wise too.

This is true for books of all genres in the global north I think.

what specifically about them makes them for "young adults"?

That’s a good question, and I’m sure the definition is controversial (like all genre definitions). I haven’t read this too closely because I’m hexbearing at work, but I found this article which is probably a good starting place: https://www.tckpublishing.com/young-adult-fiction/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

our very own UlyssesT

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (2 children)

His brother is the YA writer

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Wait there are 2 of them 😳

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

This is getting out of hand!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

He ripped off his big bro and also wrote one himself.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

I didn't expect this to generate a struggle session. I think they are just largely cringe from what I've seen. I'm not sure how that is reactionary? Also half the stuff I post in the comments is basically just steam of conscious stuff.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Hank is the platonic ideal of a lib who has some queer friends

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

what sucks is he has described having been a radlib or anarchist or something in the past when he was super focused on climate change, reading Andreas Malm, etc.

I still don't get what changed his mind. Success, I guess. And probably a lack of theory

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Not an uncommon journey for a vibes based radlib, but I have no idea

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Hank has investigated (as seen in the video), therefore he has the right to speak.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

didn't stop him from being a fucking dolt about it but yea

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›