15
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

inb4 the steam ends within 10 minutes of this being posted

Join if opsec is not a problem, huge happening

[-] [email protected] 41 points 5 months ago

they should NEVER have tried finding that submarine and should have in fact shot the people on it if it had returned safely.

miyazaki-laugh

[-] [email protected] 31 points 5 months ago

wojak-nooo

"HE VICIOUSLY ATTACKED ME BY CALLING ME NAMES GUYS!"

[-] [email protected] 35 points 5 months ago

Ikr? And/or just doing a game theory and shitting in the toilet anyways, since it's better to have less shit than more shit in your pants. Fulfilling the stupid American stereotype by walking around with shit in his pants and still daring to call the people subjected to the smell "uncivilized".

[-] [email protected] 43 points 5 months ago

He framed it as China becoming more "civilized" where people no longer piss on the street or spit at your feet, and public washrooms have toilet paper (his excuse for why he used to shit his pants all the time).

tito-laugh

[-] [email protected] 36 points 5 months ago

hahahaha its the original soyjak who "fucking loves science"!!!

I remember he recently shat out a video about how the solution to homelessness is to build more houses because: "akkording to muh soyience, supply must be down because demand and price lines go up!"

[-] [email protected] 35 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Its also interesting from a literary standpoint when the soyjak tries to cynically fit OP venting about their boss (rightfully so) to some depoliticized pathological template (since history ended and thus only interpersonal problems remain), but can't, since he can't empathize with anyone who is working class, so he just runs up against his own genocidal liberal hysteria again and again, projecting it onto OP while shitting everywhere and crying.

[-] [email protected] 54 points 5 months ago

This is most likely some smug middle class shithead with a white collar job who has no understanding of how painful the poverty of the people who suffer to uphold his comfortable air-conditioned status quo is.

Imagine being such a self-righteous petty cuck to the elite that you launch into armchair psychoanalysis and pearl-clutch about "muh extremism!!11!!11" when someone anonymously vents about their boss on the internet.

[-] [email protected] 34 points 6 months ago

I saw a conversation here where someone thought homophobia wasn't that bad in the 90s.

"Homophobia wasn't that bad at a time when it was a common coming of youth ritual to hunt gay people at night for sport."

[-] [email protected] 40 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Sounds like you're making excuses for lowlife pieces of shit.

There is "no excuse" for your american soyciety, one of the richest in the world, to allow its citizens to starve and die in agony on the streets. This is why there are so many americans who want to escape their shithole country and live elsewhere.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago

That image, put together as an RNA sequence, made for a world plague.

According to Mao, the external influence of COVID19 on the western imperialist world order only created a world plague because of the internal contradictions between the "profit motive at all costs" mentality of the political economy and the fact that workers have to produce the surplus value required for such profit by being in a situation where transmission is inevitable as time tends towards infinity. There was also a contradiction between the essential nature of competition in the world economy and the requirement for cooperation between nations to contain/eliminate the virus.

As such, human life was sacrificed for the profit motive and the western bourgeoisie as a whole let the virus spread amongst the workforce instead of implementing controls which would make work safer but jeopardize profit. Furthermore, they prevented poorer countries from having the formulae for vaccines so that they could be in control of distribution and profit from sales.

Since it is more profitable to catch a man a fish so he can eat for a day (at your price) instead of teaching him to fish so he eats for free.

21
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The contradiction between my brain capacity and the genius that went into Mao's writings gave me a headache. I need an adult please.

Lets start by asking, in reference to:

"It is evident that purely external causes can only give rise to mechanical motion, that is, to changes in scale or quantity, but cannot explain why things differ qualitatively in thousands of ways and why one thing changes into another. As a matter of fact, even mechanical motion under external force occurs through the internal contradictoriness of things. Simple growth in plants and animals, their quantitative development, is likewise chiefly the result of their internal contradictions."

I kind of understand what is meant here, but isn't plant and animal growth governed by multiple different chemical reactions?

I don't have a biology degree but there aren't just two chemical reactions acting in opposition to each other, or a set of pairs of chemical reactions, right?

How can something so complex be reduced to pairs of opposites? Doesn't that impose a limitation? What if instead of a dialectic its an n-alectic where n can possibly reach the thousands or millions (since things "differ qualitatively in thousands of ways")? Is this really what Mao wanted to convey?

Obviously his ideas were "right" because they helped develop a correct understanding of reality such that Mao won wars. I just don't understand what is meant.

[-] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago

Yeah because Americans are stupid right wing reactionaries that think sex is something Satan gave humanity and get scared when their wee wees harden as a result.

Same logic as drag queens being "groomers" to kids when they read them stories, or trans people being a threat in schools. Just a massive moral panic caused by judeo Christian soylent. A fucking non issue.

[-] [email protected] 34 points 7 months ago

he said, they are “getting angry and entitled and whiny” about the prospect of having to work hard for the rest of their adult life, only to “get nothing in return.”

"You will own nothing... And you will be happy."

1
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Hi everyone, if I may I would like to ask a question about possible progressive interpretations of the events during the beginning of Genesis?

I am confused as to why God was angry enough at Adam and Eve for eating the fruit of the tree of knowledge and gaining knowledge of good and evil to sentence them to lives of suffering? It seems really unfair to me on a surface level so I am curious as to what this means in the context of Christian history and struggle against the romans, for instance.

view more: next ›

SuperNovaCouchGuy2

joined 2 years ago