220
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

It's bullshit that the opposite of "impeachable" is "unimpeachable" instead of "peachable"

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 41 points 1 month ago

It’s because the im isn’t a prefix but part of the word. (It was originally spelt empeche)

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ackshully:

Looking at the etymology, impeach is from old-french "empecher", and "em" was an alternative form of the old-french prefix "en".

And "empecher" is itself is derived from the late latin "impedicare", which uses the Latin prefix "im" from which the French prefix comes. And is prefixed to "predica".

So it it is a prefix.

Of course, the latin (and French) prefixes aren't used to indicate opposite meaning, like "in" often is. But that's just yet more bullshit.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

To be fair it was a prefix in the Latin word that it's ultimately derived from. We still treat it a little like a prefix when we use the im- part of the related "import" like a prefix, as we also have "export" and "transport"

[-] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago

It's bullshit that the opposite of "important" is "unimportant" instead of "portant"

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Should be exportant, obviously

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

disportn't've

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

And "portant" to me sounds very similar to urgent which would make important a better negative / opposite.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago

Also, "gruntled" should be the opposite of "disgruntled".

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

Well I'll be damned. I've used it as a word regardless, lol, but my spell check still hasn't gotten the memo apparently.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

I find this whole conversation whelming.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Stay whelmed.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

So, would you say you’re more gruntled now?

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

And something that has not been debunked is still bunk.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago

Inflammable means flammable? What a country!

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ehh, at least we don't randomly assign every noun one of three genders, and have to memorize them all in order to use the correct form of "the" when speaking about it.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Just wait until you hear about declension

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

These are called orphaned negatives and English has loads of them. A great article about them is here: https://stephenliddell.co.uk/2021/03/17/a-gruntled-look-at-orphan-negatives/

As a slight tangent, a similar peculiarity in English (which I don't know of a name for) is where you can use the opposite words for similar actions, e.g. you can chop a tree down and then chop it up.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Reminds me of folding cardboard boxes. If you are taking a flat piece and make a box of it, are you folding a box or unfolding the cardboard. Or both. And when you do the reverse, you do the same, do you not?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Not exactly the same, but that also reminds me of autoantonyms or Janus words. The word dust can be used to describe adding dust or removing dust, for example.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Great link! I love the little story in there.

I actually use "shevelled" alongside many other words which to my mind "should logically exist" - for example, at the weekend I dismantled and then remantled a wall in my garden.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Good one, and you now have a mantled wall!

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Contronyms is another great one. English is so tuitive.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

The most consistent thing about English is how inconsistent it is!

Which is to be expected when you have a Germanic language that is so heavily influenced by Latin languages.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Well you guys can peach me any day you'd like. 👄

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

u gotsed peached

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

I don't hate it. Pretty gusting if you ask me.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I am demused. I can't express my unappointment

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

The existence of "amused" implies the existence of "bimused", "homomused", "panmused" and possibly even more

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I'm metromused

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Reminds me of that Doofenschmirtz line: "Ah, Perry the Platypus... As always, your timing is impeckable. And by that I mean COMPLETELY PECKABLE!"

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

expeachable

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Because im is not a typo of un

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Not to be rude but you meant to write: unpossible

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Don't be surprised. Such quirks are unimpossible in English... /s

this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
220 points (92.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

27809 readers
638 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS