PCGaming

6474 readers

35 users here now

Rule 0: Be civil

Rule #1: No spam, porn, or facilitating piracy

Rule #2: No advertisements

Rule #3: No memes, PCMR language, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #4: No tech support or game help questions

Rule #5: No questions about building/buying computers, hardware, peripherals, furniture, etc.

Rule #6: No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.

Rule #7: No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts

Rule #8: No off-topic posts/comments

Rule #9: Use the original source, no editorialized titles, no duplicates

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

$200 Graphics Cards - Were older cards better? - 2kliksphilip (www.youtube.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At first I thought this must be obviously bad satire. I thought: “If course newer cards at the same price level aren’t worse than older cards, they are just not as much better as they have been in the past.”, and if you think the same, you may be surprised as well.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well inflation alone will cause this. But then add shrinkflation and filthy companies and yeah it's all down hill

[+] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

6650xt would objectively be a better buy unless you're really penny pinching. A couple of them are at $240.

[+] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Well the biggest issue with PC gaming these days is the high cost of entry. Once you have a PC, you can upgrade as needed or wanted and have your machine how you want it. Versus buying a console that is limited in what it can do and more to that point stuck in a market for games that are sub based or just outright paying full price for games, even years after release. coughcall of dutycough

We are at that point in the current console's lifespan where they DO make more sense compared to the high cost of entry for PCs and this won't get any better since we're dealing with inflation and silicon shortages as things are now. Problem being, and the question people who are in the market right now will have to ask themselves, "What do I want this machine to do for me.".

If you just want to game, well, a console might be the best idea.

If you want to do more than that and have full control over your system (Especially with Linux gaming being something that is possible now.), then PC might be where you want to aim.

This back and forth has been happening for years, and like you said, used is the best way to get into the PC market as it all stands.

For the record, I did end up with a 6650xt for myself as I realized the value that the card had over the others. I bought mine right at the end of the GPU shortage and paid $400 for it, but that was the best I could get at the time for the money I had. The next step up (Actual worth it step up, I mean.) was $200 more than that. So for me it was a no brainer, but to a budget shopper right now they may not see the benefit of an extra $20-$40-$60 on a video card as it's really the most important piece to a successful budget build to perform halfway decent. Trust me, I've built a lot of machines over the years and I think this build I have now has been my best chosen for being futureproof, current performance, and compatibility, while still being somewhat mid-range. Well, it's starting to get down towards more low-range now if you're all about AAA games, but thankfully that isn't the case for me.