381
degree in bamf (mander.xyz)
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 96 points 6 months ago
[-] [email protected] 34 points 6 months ago

Yeah for real, there's been another very old tweet that this seems to be based on. Might be real but reads very copied from the previous one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago

Tell me you don’t talk to female academics, lol.

[-] [email protected] 51 points 6 months ago

NASA Earth meeting

Are there also meetings on other planets?

[-] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago

Duh, it's NASA, they can fly to the Moon or Mars

[-] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago

They should do a video call instead of flying there for meetings all the time. Much more efficient and cheaper.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Imagine the latency to Mars though

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Just use a cable

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 37 points 6 months ago

I'd be willing to bet this isn't real.

I've been to lots of scientific talks and the idea of someone trying to call put the person talking is kind of ridulous and never happens. You would have to an asshole of the highest calibre to do that. And the fact he mentions a specific paper/person and that just happened to be tbe person speaking and the idea that the speakers name wasn't listed is just so incredibly unlikely I can't ever imagine that happening.

This just seems like the kind of thing people fantasing happening, so they can smugly correct them.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

To be fair, she didn't say she was giving a talk, guess it could have been a side conversation. It would seem more likely in a little side conversation.

However, at least when it happened to me, the other person remembered the paper but not the author, so it seems weird to refer to the paper by author. Also it feels weird even if he did remember to throw in the "et al". It's extra weird for her to declare that she is "McCarty et al", since she is saying she is "and others". It feels like a detail thrown in to make the exchange sound more "sciencey", when it doesn't make sense.

Since I had it happen to me, I'm sure it's happened to other paper writers, but this exchange doesn't sound like a realistic way for it to go down. So it's at least massaged for dramatic effect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 29 points 6 months ago

Why did she have to specify the "white male" part?

[-] [email protected] 100 points 6 months ago

to trigger insecure white males

[-] [email protected] 61 points 6 months ago

Judging from this thread, mission accomplished.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

I find it unnecessary. Race/gender/skin color or whatever shouldn't matter.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago

You know how it goes, not all white males… but almost always it is a white male.

This guy probably wouldn't have even considered insulting a speaker that way if she wasn't a woman. In a scientific setting it's one thing disagreeing with an argument, and attacking the person proposing the argument.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Not true, African American males are just as sexist as white American males.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yet somehow it is true that the vast majority of smug people who are confidently wrong are white males. Maybe someday we can have equality in the ratio of being smug while confidently wrong.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago

The irony of this comment

[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The biggest snowflakes on the planet. Pun intended. They're just so repressed...

[-] [email protected] 44 points 6 months ago

Because that's the group most likely to commit misogyny in the workplace? Especially in male dominated fields.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago

When someone commits a robbery and they happen to be the race that commits robberies the most often, do you feel the need to point that out?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago

I mean, she's McCarty...

But I feel like this reploat has been around for a decade by now, and it's always bothered me.

Just sounds like a George Costanaza thing where she thought of this comeback but never in the moment

[-] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago

the hair thing could be drama for the tweet but everything else is not the first time nor the last time that happened, there are others stories like that

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Don't you understand? It's not about him. To have a line as perfect as 'jerk store' and to never use it. I, I couldn't live with myself.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago

Human drivers of fire??

[-] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

White guys in this thread: Hey now, this racism business is a two way street.

Everyone else: Your race is bad so we can be racist!

[-] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

That's not how "et al" works

[-] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

Someone call the police!

I am the police.

Colloquially, it is.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

Ooofff

Big L right there

This once again shows how important it is to acknowledge ones own biases and to account for them.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Wow. If true, sick slam.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

holy shit just like digimon

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

What's this got to do with his skin colour?

Or... is she just racist?

[-] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

She's just pointing out that because of his race, the man she was taking to was in a place of social privilege and he should be more mindful of this when talking to under-represented groups in his field, such as women and POC.

Reminding him that his race grants him a level of authority, encourages him not to approach every conversation with the assumption that he is the smartest in the room.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Hand wavey nonsense. Racism is racism no matter the direction or made up reasons.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

But Doctor, I Am Pagliacci

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
381 points (85.6% liked)

Confidently Incorrect

3959 readers
1 users here now

When people are way too smug about their wrong answer.

Posting guidelines.

All posts in this community have come from elsewhere, it is not original content, the poster in this community is not OP. The person who posts in this community isn’t necessarily endorsing whatever the post is talking about and they are not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.

You are welcome to discuss and debate any topic but arguments are not welcome here. I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. Report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

There is currently no rule about how recent a post needs to be because the community is about the comeback part, not the topic.

Rules:

• Be civil and remember the human.

• No trolling, insults or name calling. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone.

• No bigotry of any kind, including homophobia, transphobia, sexism and racism.

• You are welcome to discuss and debate any topic but arguments are not welcome here. I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. Report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

• Try not to get too political. A lot of these posts will involve politics, but this isn’t the place for political arguments.

• Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguements sake.

• Mark NSFW posts if they contain nudity.

• Satire is allowed but please start the post title with [satire] so other users can filter it out if they’d like.

Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.

This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  1. Be civil, remember the human.
  2. No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
  3. Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  4. Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum.
  5. Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  6. Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  7. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  8. No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS